Direct-to-consumer testing as consumer initiated testing: compromises to the testing process and opportunities for quality improvement.

consumer initiated testing direct-to-consumer testing in vitro devices regulation medical overuse total testing process

Journal

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1437-4331
Titre abrégé: Clin Chem Lab Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9806306

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 31 07 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 14 8 2024
pubmed: 14 8 2024
entrez: 14 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) refers to commercial laboratory tests initiated by laypersons without the involvement of healthcare professionals. As this market grows in size and variety of products, a clear definition of DTCT to ground the conceptualization of their harms and benefits is needed. We describe how three different modalities of DTCT (home self-testing, self-sampled tests, and direct access tests) present caveats to the traditional testing process ('brain-to-brain loop'), and how this might differ between medical vs. non-medical laboratories. We make recommendations for ways to improve quality and reduce errors with respect to DTCT. The potential benefits and harms of DTCT will invariably depend on the context and situation of individual consumers and the types of tests involved. Importantly, implications for both consumers and the healthcare system should be considered, such as the effects on improving health outcomes and reducing unnecessary testing and use of clinical resources. 'Consumer initiation' must be a central defining characteristic of DTCT, to clearly demarcate the key drawbacks as well as opportunities of this type of testing from a laboratory specialists' perspective. The concept of 'consumer initiated testing' should also help define DTCT regulation, and provide a locus of efforts to support consumers as the main decision-makers in the purchasing and conducting of these tests in the absence of clinician gatekeeping.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39141796
pii: cclm-2024-0876
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0876
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Références

Orth, M, Vollebregt, E, Trenti, T, Shih, P, Tollanes, M, Sandberg, S. Direct-to-consumer laboratory testing (DTCT): challenges and implications for specialists in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;61:696–702. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1227 .
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1227
Shih, P, Ding, P, Carter, SM, Stanaway, F, Horvath, AR, Langguth, D, et al.. Direct-to-consumer tests advertised online in Australia and their implications for medical overuse: systematic online review and a typology of clinical utility. BMJ Open 2023;13:e074205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074205 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074205
Ayala-Lopez, N, Nichols, JH. Benefits and risks of direct-to-consumer testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020;144:1193–8. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0078-ra .
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0078-ra
Precedence Research . Direct-to-consumer laboratory testing market – global industry analysis, size, share, growth, trends, regional outlook, and forecast 2023–2032 ; 2023. Available from: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/direct-to-consumer-laboratory-testing-market .
Exten, C, Pinto, CN, Gaynor, AM, Meyerson, B, Griner, S, Van Der Pol, B. Direct-to-consumer STI testing services: a position statement from the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. Sex Transm Dis 2021;48:e155–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0000000000001475 .
doi: 10.1097/olq.0000000000001475
Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lundberg, GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon .
doi: 10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon
Lundberg, GD. Acting on significant laboratory results. JAMA 1981;245:1762–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1981.03310420052033 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.1981.03310420052033
Bloss, CS, Schork, NJ, Topol, EJ. Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation. J Med Genet 2014;51:83–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909 .
doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909
Wilkinson, E. The rise of direct-to-consumer testing: is the NHS paying the price? BMJ 2022;379. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2518 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2518
Jones, SL, Campbell, B, Hart, T. Laboratory tests commonly used in complementary and alternative medicine: a review of the evidence. Ann Clin Biochem 2019;56:310–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563218824622 .
doi: 10.1177/0004563218824622
Wong, A, White, H, Plant, A, Shipman, A, Shipman, K. Issues surrounding consumer-bought food-allergy testing. Clin Exp Dermatol 2022;47:547–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14978 .
doi: 10.1111/ced.14978
Tidy, EJ, Shine, B, Oke, J, Hayward, G. Home self-testing kits: helpful or harmful? Br J Gen Pract 2018;68:360–1. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18x698021 .
doi: 10.3399/bjgp18x698021
Johnson, A, Thompson, R, Nickel, B, Shih, P, Hammarberg, K, Copp, T. Websites selling direct-to-consumer anti-mullerian hormone tests. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2330192-e. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30192 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30192
Lovett, KM, Mackey, TK, Liang, BA. Evaluating the evidence: direct-to-consumer screening tests advertised online. J Med Screen 2012;19:141–53. https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2012.012025 .
doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012025
Krogsbøll, LT, Jørgensen, KJ, Larsen, CG, Gøtzsche, PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009009.pub3 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd009009.pub3
McAlister, S, Barratt, AL, Bell, KJ, McGain, F. The carbon footprint of pathology testing. Med J Aust 2020;212:377–82. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50583 .
doi: 10.5694/mja2.50583
Scott, S, Ozben, T, Rampi, V, Gruson, D, Gammie, A, Lopez, J, et al.. EFLM guidelines for green and sustainable medical laboratories . Milan: European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine; 2022.
Galior, KD, Baumann, NA. Challenges with at-home and mail-in direct-to-consumer testing: preanalytical error, reporting results, and result interpretation. Clin Lab Med 2020;40:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2019.11.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.11.006
Lundberg, GD. The need for an outcomes research agenda for clinical laboratory testing. JAMA 1998;280:565–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.6.565 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.6.565
Korenstein, D, Chimonas, S, Barrow, B, Keyhani, S, Troy, A, Lipitz-Snyderman, A. Development of a conceptual map of negative consequences for patients of overuse of medical tests and treatments. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:1401–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3573 .
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3573

Auteurs

Patti Shih (P)

Australian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values, School of Health & Society, 8691 University of Wollongong , Wollongong, Australia.

Sverre Sandberg (S)

Noklus, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Public Global Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Noklus, The Norwegian Organization for Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations, Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus AS, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Public Global Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.

Jan Balla (J)

Klinicka biochemia a imunochemia, Analyticko-diagnosticke laboratorium, Kovacska, Presov, Slovakia.

Banu Isbilen Basok (BI)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Izmir, Izmir, Türkiye.

Jennifer J Brady (JJ)

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Children's Health Ireland at Temple St, Dublin 1, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Bernard Croal (B)

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian-Clinical Biochemistry, Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Nathalie De Vos (N)

LHUB-ULB Clinical Chemistry, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Mathias Karlsson (M)

Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Clinical Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Piret Kedars (P)

Central Laboratory, East Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Harjumaa, Estonia.

Tomris Ozben (T)

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye.
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Marina Pijanovic (M)

Laboratorija Medilab, Pozega, Republic of Serbia.

Mario Plebani (M)

Dipartimento di Medicina di Laboratorio, Universita di Padova, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Matthias Orth (M)

Institut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Vinzenz von Paul Kliniken gGmbH, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Classifications MeSH