Can mechanical heart valves perform similarly to tissue valves? An in vitro study.

Current surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement options include bioprosthetic and mechanical heart valves (MHVs), each with inherent limitations. Bioprosthetic valves offer superior hemodynamics but suffer from durability issues, typically initiating deterioration within 7-8 years. MHVs, while durable, necessitate lifelong anticoagulation therapy, presenting risks such as severe bleeding and thromboembolic events. The need for anticoagulants is caused by non-physiological flow through the hinge area during the closed phase and large spikes of regional backflow velocity (RBV) during the closing phase that produces high shear events. This study introduces the iValve, a novel MHV designed to combine the hemodynamic benefits of bioprosthetic valves with the durability of MHVs without requiring anticoagulation. The iValve features eye-like leaflets, a saddle-shaped housing, and an optimized hinge design to enhance blood flow and minimize thrombotic risk. Fabricated using 6061-T6 aluminum and polyether ether ketone (PEEK), twelve iValve iterations were evaluated for their opening and closing dynamics. The reported top-performing prototypes demonstrated competitive performance against industry standards. The proposed iValve prototype exhibited a mean RBV of -4.34 m/s with no spikes in RBV, performing similarly to bioprosthetic valves and significantly outperforming existing MHVs. The iValve's optimized design showed a 7-10% reduction in closing time and a substantial decrease in RBV spikes, potentially reducing the need for anticoagulation therapy. This study highlights the iValve's potential to revolutionize prosthetic heart valve technology by offering a durable, hemodynamically superior solution that mitigates the drawbacks of current MHVs.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.