Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis.

Adverse event Aspiration Complication Diabetes Gastroscopy

Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
revised: 27 06 2024
accepted: 02 07 2024
medline: 15 8 2024
pubmed: 15 8 2024
entrez: 14 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on upper endoscopy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively review the available evidence on this subject. A systematic bibliographic search was carried out until May 2024. Pooled estimates were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of retained gastric content (RGC), while secondary outcomes included rates of aborted and repeated procedures, adverse event (AE) rate, and rates of aspiration. This analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 84,065 patients. Patients receiving GLP-1RA therapy exhibited significantly higher rates of RGC (OR 5.56, 3.35-9.23), a trend that was consistent among patients with diabetes (OR 2.60, 2.23-3.02). Adjusted analysis, accounting for variables such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and other therapies, confirmed the elevated rates of RGC in the GLP-1RA user group (aOR 4.20, 3.42-5.15). Furthermore, rates of aborted and repeated procedures were higher in the GLP-1RA user group (OR 5.13, 3.01-8.75, and OR 2.19, 1.43-3.35; respectively). However, no significant differences were found in AE and aspiration rates between the two groups (OR 4.04, 0.63-26.03, and OR 1.75, 0.64-4.77; respectively). Use of GLP-1RAs is associated with increased retention of gastric contents and more frequent aborted procedures during upper endoscopy. However, the AEs and aspiration rates do not seem different, therefore adjusting fasting time instead of routinely withholding GLP-1RAs could be reasonable in these patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on upper endoscopy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively review the available evidence on this subject.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic bibliographic search was carried out until May 2024. Pooled estimates were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of retained gastric content (RGC), while secondary outcomes included rates of aborted and repeated procedures, adverse event (AE) rate, and rates of aspiration.
RESULTS RESULTS
This analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 84,065 patients. Patients receiving GLP-1RA therapy exhibited significantly higher rates of RGC (OR 5.56, 3.35-9.23), a trend that was consistent among patients with diabetes (OR 2.60, 2.23-3.02). Adjusted analysis, accounting for variables such as sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and other therapies, confirmed the elevated rates of RGC in the GLP-1RA user group (aOR 4.20, 3.42-5.15). Furthermore, rates of aborted and repeated procedures were higher in the GLP-1RA user group (OR 5.13, 3.01-8.75, and OR 2.19, 1.43-3.35; respectively). However, no significant differences were found in AE and aspiration rates between the two groups (OR 4.04, 0.63-26.03, and OR 1.75, 0.64-4.77; respectively).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Use of GLP-1RAs is associated with increased retention of gastric contents and more frequent aborted procedures during upper endoscopy. However, the AEs and aspiration rates do not seem different, therefore adjusting fasting time instead of routinely withholding GLP-1RAs could be reasonable in these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39142543
pii: S1542-3565(24)00717-1
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Antonio Facciorusso (A)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Daryl Ramai (D)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Jahnvi Dhar (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Jayanta Samanta (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Saurabh Chandan (S)

Center for Interventional Endoscopy (CIE), Advent Health, Orlando, Florida, USA.

Paraskevas Gkolfakis (P)

Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece.

Stefano Francesco Crinò (SF)

Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Marcello Maida (M)

Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.

Andrea Anderloni (A)

Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

Ivo Boskoski (I)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Konstantinos Triantafyllou (K)

Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodastrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro (M)

Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center & RISE@CI-IPO, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Cesare Hassan (C)

Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Lorenzo Fuccio (L)

Department of Medical Sciences and Surgery, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Marianna Arvanitakis (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Hepatopancreatology, HUB Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH