Effect of postprocessing parameters on the flexural strength of vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with postprocessing guidelines.


Journal

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
ISSN: 1097-6841
Titre abrégé: J Prosthet Dent
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376364

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 13 03 2024
revised: 16 07 2024
accepted: 17 07 2024
medline: 15 8 2024
pubmed: 15 8 2024
entrez: 14 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Limited data exist regarding the effects of postprocessing on the flexural strength of vat-polymerized additively manufactured (AM) interim fixed dental prostheses. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine how the postprocessing workflow affects the mechanical properties of vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses and to establish clinical guidelines. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was "For vat-polymerized additively manufactured interim fixed dental prostheses (P), does varying the postprocessing workflow/ protocol (I and C) affect mechanical properties/physical properties/flexural strength (O)?" Searches were conducted in 3 databases: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science, with 2 investigators performing the title and abstract screening and setting the inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify publications. The risk of bias was evaluated by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies (nonrandomized experimental studies). The reported independent variables of rinse solution, rinse time, and polymerization time on the flexural strength results were extracted for qualitative review. The initial search identified 149 records, with 12 in vitro studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the manufacturing process and materials. Eleven of 12 included studies reported flexural strength above 100 MPa when following the manufacturer's recommendation. Postprocessing rinsing ranged from 5 seconds to 90 minutes, with potentially reduced flexural strength with extended rinsing. A rinse of 5 to 10 minutes was recommended for optimal mechanical properties, degree of conversion, and biocompatibility. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (TPM) were the most investigated rising solutions, while experimental solutions including 99.5% acetone and 100% bio-ethyl alcohol reportedly decreased flexural strength. Polymerization time and intensity correlated positively with the flexural strength, whereas an artificial aging process reduced the flexural strength. Heterogeneity existed in the reported postprocessing protocols for AM interim fixed prostheses, including manufacturer materials, methods, and study outcomes. While polymerization time and intensity correlated with greater strength, consistent patterns regarding rinsing solution or time were lacking. Rinsing solution, extended rinsing time, and artificial aging may reduce flexural strength. Further investigation is indicated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39142995
pii: S0022-3913(24)00497-9
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.016
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Editorial Council for The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Yu Chun Lin (YC)

Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA. Electronic address: yuchunlindds@gmail.com.

Daler Tarrazzi (D)

Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.

Todd Schoenbaum (T)

Professor, Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.

Kent Knoernschild (K)

Chair and Professor, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.

Classifications MeSH