Exploring motor skill acquisition in bimanual coordination: insights from navigating a novel maze task.
Bimanual coordination
Kinematic dynamics
Maze
Motor learning
Tactile feedback
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2024
14 08 2024
Historique:
received:
17
04
2024
accepted:
01
08
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this study, we introduce a novel maze task designed to investigate naturalistic motor learning in bimanual coordination. We developed and validated an extended set of movement primitives tailored to capture the full spectrum of scenarios encountered in a maze game. Over a 3-day training period, we evaluated participants' performance using these primitives and a custom-developed software, enabling precise quantification of performance. Our methodology integrated the primitives with in-depth kinematic analyses and thorough thumb pressure assessments, charting the trajectory of participants' progression from novice to proficient stages. Results demonstrated consistent improvement in maze performance and significant adaptive changes in joint behaviors and strategic recalibrations in thumb pressure distribution. These findings highlight the central nervous system's adaptability in orchestrating sophisticated motor strategies and the crucial role of tactile feedback in precision tasks. The maze platform and setup emerge as a valuable foundation for future experiments, providing a tool for the exploration of motor learning and coordination dynamics. This research underscores the complexity of bimanual motor learning in naturalistic environments, enhancing our understanding of skill acquisition and task efficiency while emphasizing the necessity for further exploration and deeper investigation into these adaptive mechanisms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143119
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69200-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69200-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18887Subventions
Organisme : Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University
ID : 277
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Obhi, S. S. Bimanual coordination: An unbalanced field of research. Motor Control 8, 111–120 (2004).
pubmed: 15118197
doi: 10.1123/mcj.8.2.111
Valero-Cuevas, F. J. & Santello, M. On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0305-3 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0305-3
pubmed: 29017508
pmcid: 5635506
Andres, F. G. et al. Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition. Brain 122, 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.5.855 (1999).
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.855
pubmed: 10355671
Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G. & Prinz, W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102060 (2001).
doi: 10.1038/35102060
pubmed: 11689944
Kennerley, S. W., Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Semjen, A. & Ivry, R. B. Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn822 (2002).
doi: 10.1038/nn822
pubmed: 11914724
Witt, S. T., Laird, A. R. & Meyerand, M. E. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: An ale meta-analysis. NeuroImage 42, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.025 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.025
pubmed: 18511305
Loehrer, P. A. et al. Ageing changes effective connectivity of motor networks during bimanual finger coordination. NeuroImage 143, 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.014 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.014
pubmed: 27616642
Kajal, D. S. et al. Learned control of inter-hemispheric connectivity: Effects on bimanual motor performance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 4353–4369. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23663 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23663
pubmed: 28580720
pmcid: 6867064
Zheng, Y., Kanosue, K. & Muraoka, T. Stability of bimanual finger tapping coordination is constrained by salient phases. Neurosci. Res. 163, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2020.02.007 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2020.02.007
pubmed: 32088328
Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N., Walter, C. B. & Serrien, D. J. Preferred and induced coordination modes during the acquisition of bimanual movements with a 2:1 frequency ratio. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 1087 (1997).
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1087
Ivry, R., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R., Hazeltine, E. & Semjen, A. A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference 259–295 (Springer, 2004).
Buchanan, J. J. & Ryu, Y. U. Scaling movement amplitude: Adaptation of timing and amplitude control in a bimanual task. J. Motor Behav. 44, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2012.656158 (2012).
doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.656158
Pixa, N. H., Steinberg, F. & Doppelmayr, M. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to both primary motor cortices improves unimanual and bimanual dexterity. Neurosci. Lett. 643, 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.033 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.033
pubmed: 28229937
Park, I., Buchanan, J. J., McCulloch, A. T., Chen, J. & Wright, D. L. Motor and spatial representations of action: Corticospinal excitability in m1 after training with a bimanual skill. Exp. Brain Res. 238, 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05795-x (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05795-x
pubmed: 32246187
Gomes-Osman, J. & Field-Fote, E. C. Bihemispheric anodal corticomotor stimulation using transcranial direct current stimulation improves bimanual typing task performance. J. Motor Behav. 45, 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2013.808604 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.808604
Leach, D., Kolokotroni, Z. & Wilson, A. D. Perceptual information supports transfer of learning in coordinated rhythmic movement. Psychol. Res. 85, 1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01308-1 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01308-1
pubmed: 32130496
Huang, S., Layer, J., Smith, D., Bingham, G. P. & Zhu, Q. The effect of movement frequency on perceptual-motor learning of a novel bimanual coordination pattern. Hum. Mov. Sci. 83, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.102958 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2022.102958
pubmed: 35561528
Mueller, K. L. O., Marion, S. D., Paul, L. K. & Brown, W. S. Bimanual motor coordination in agenesis of the corpus callosum. Behav. Neurosci. 123, 1000 (2009).
pubmed: 19824766
doi: 10.1037/a0016868
Dietz, V. et al. Neural coupling of cooperative hand movements: A reflex and fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 25, 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht285 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht285
pubmed: 24122137
Köchli, S., Scharfenberger, T. & Dietz, V. Coordination of bilateral synchronous and asynchronous hand movements. Neurosci. Lett. 720, 134757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134757 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134757
pubmed: 31962150
Doost, M. Y. et al. Learning a bimanual cooperative skill in chronic stroke under noninvasive brain stimulation: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 33, 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319847963 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/1545968319847963
pubmed: 31088342
Yeganeh Doost, M., Orban de Xivry, J.-J., Bihin, B. & Vandermeeren, Y. Two processes in early bimanual motor skill learning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 618 (2017).
pubmed: 29326573
pmcid: 5742346
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00618
Schoenfeld, M. J., Grigoras, I.-F., Stagg, C. J. & Zich, C. Investigating different levels of bimanual interaction with a novel motor learning task: A behavioural and transcranial alternating current stimulation study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 755748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.755748 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.755748
pubmed: 34867245
pmcid: 8635148
Haith, A. M., Yang, C. S., Pakpoor, J. & Kita, K. . De. novo motor learning of a bimanual control task over multiple days of practice. J. Neurophysiol. 128, 982–993. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00474.2021 (2022).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00474.2021
pubmed: 36129208
Doyon, J. & Benali, H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004
pubmed: 15831397
Maselli, A. et al. Beyond simple laboratory studies: Developing sophisticated models to study rich behavior. Phys. Life Rev. 46, 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.006 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.07.006
pubmed: 37499620
Halsband, U. & Lange, R. K. Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies. J. Physiol. Paris 99, 414–424 (2006).
pubmed: 16730432
doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007
Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A. & Poeppel, D. Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041
pubmed: 28182904
Haar, S., van Assel, C. M. & Faisal, A. A. Motor learning in real-world pool billiards. Sci. Rep. 10, 20046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76805-9 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76805-9
pubmed: 33208785
pmcid: 7674448
Krotov, A., Russo, M., Nah, M., Hogan, N. & Sternad, D. Motor control beyond reach-how humans hit a target with a whip. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 220581 (2022).
pubmed: 36249337
pmcid: 9533004
doi: 10.1098/rsos.220581
Smeets, J. B. J., Frens, M. A. & Brenner, E. Throwing darts: Timing is not the limiting factor. Exp. Brain Res. 144, 268–274 (2002).
pubmed: 12012165
doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1072-2
Beek, P. J. & Lewbel, A. The science of juggling. Sci. Am. 273, 92–97 (1995).
doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1195-92
Flanagan, J. R., Bowman, M. C. & Johansson, R. S. Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.005 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.005
pubmed: 17084619
Johansson, R. S. & Flanagan, J. R. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2621 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/nrn2621
pubmed: 19352402
Johansson, R. & Flanagan, J. 6.05—Tactile sensory control of object manipulation in humans. In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference (eds Masland, R. H. et al.) 67–86 (Academic Press, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370880-9.00346-7 .
doi: 10.1016/B978-012370880-9.00346-7
Säfström, D. & Domellöf, E. Brain activations supporting linking of action phases in a sequential manual task. Neuroimage 172, 608–619 (2018).
pubmed: 29428579
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.014
Maycock, J. et al. Approaching manual intelligence. Künstl. Intell. Issue Cogn. Tech. Syst. 24, 287–294 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s13218-010-0064-9
Schürmann, C., Koiva, R., Haschke, R. & Ritter, H. A modular high-speed tactile sensor for human manipulation research. In World Haptics Conference (WHC), 339–344 (2011).
Giszter, S. F. Motor primitives-new data and future questions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.004 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.004
pubmed: 25912883
pmcid: 6524953
Reis, J. et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 1590–1595. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805413106 (2009).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805413106
pubmed: 19164589
pmcid: 2635787
Krakauer, J. W. & Mazzoni, P. Human sensorimotor learning: Adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 636–644 (2011).
pubmed: 21764294
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.012
van Beers, R. J. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron 63, 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025
pubmed: 19679079
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G. & Zelaznik, H. N. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (Human Kinetics, 2018).
Davidowitz, I. et al. Relationship between spasticity and upper-limb movement disorders in individuals with subacute stroke using stochastic spatiotemporal modeling. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 33, 141–152 (2019).
pubmed: 30744528
doi: 10.1177/1545968319826050
Yao, K. & Billard, A. An inverse optimization approach to understand human acquisition of kinematic coordination in bimanual fine manipulation tasks. Biol. Cybern. 114, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-019-00814-9 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s00422-019-00814-9
pubmed: 31907609
pmcid: 7062861
Bentivegna, D. & Atkeson, C. Learning from observation using primitives. In Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164), vol. 2, 1988–1993, https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932899 (2001).
Bentivegna, D. C., Atkeson, C. G. & Cheng, G. Learning tasks from observation and practice. Robot. Auton. Syst. 47, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2004.03.010 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2004.03.010
Rappaport, A. T. Cognitive primitives. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 29, 733–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(88)80076-2 (1988).
doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(88)80076-2
Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Goodman, N. D. The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models. Psychol. Rev. 123, 392–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039980 (2016).
doi: 10.1037/a0039980
pubmed: 27077241
Mussa-Ivaldi, F. & Bizzi, E. Motor learning through the combination of primitives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 355, 1755–1769. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2000.0733 (2000).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0733
Thoroughman, K. A. & Shadmehr, R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/35037588 (2000).
doi: 10.1038/35037588
pubmed: 11048720
pmcid: 2556237
Flash, T. & Hochner, B. Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 660–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.011 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.011
pubmed: 16275056
Konidaris, G., Kuindersma, S., Grupen, R. & Barto, A. Robot learning from demonstration by constructing skill trees. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31, 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364911428653 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/0278364911428653
Giszter, S. F. Motor primitives-new data and future questions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 33, 156–165 (2015).
pubmed: 25912883
pmcid: 6524953
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.004
Langlois, E. T., Bennequin, D. & de Marco, G. Role of the cerebellum in the construction of functional and geometrical spaces. Cerebellum https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-024-01693-y (2024).
doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01693-y
pubmed: 38625534
Woch, A. & Plamondon, R. Using the framework of the kinematic theory for the definition of a movement primitive. Motor Control 8, 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.8.4.547 (2004).
doi: 10.1123/mcj.8.4.547
pubmed: 15585907
Bentivegna, D. C. & Atkeson, C. G. Using primitives in learning from observation. In Proceedings of the First IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2000), 18–24 (IEEE, 2000).
Kuniyoshi, Y., Inaba, M. & Inoue, H. Learning by watching: Extracting reusable task knowledge from visual observation of human performance. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 10, 799–822 (1994).
doi: 10.1109/70.338535
Schaal, S., Kotosaka, S. & Sternad, D. Nonlinear dynamical systems as movement primitives. In IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robotics, 1–11 (2000).
Kruger, V., Herzog, D. L., Baby, S., Ude, A. & Kragic, D. Learning actions from observations. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 17, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2010.936961 (2010).
doi: 10.1109/MRA.2010.936961
Yang, Y., Saleemi, I. & Shah, M. Discovering motion primitives for unsupervised grouping and one-shot learning of human actions, gestures, and expressions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1635–1648. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.253 (2013).
doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.253
pubmed: 23681992
Manschitz, S., Kober, J., Gienger, M. & Peters, J. Learning to sequence movement primitives from demonstrations. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 4414–4421. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2014.6943187 (2014).
Kumar, A. et al. Training-induced dynamics of accuracy and precision in human motor control. Sci. Rep. 7, 6784 (2017).
pubmed: 28754929
pmcid: 5533741
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07078-y
Zhang, Z. & Sternad, D. Back to reality: Differences in learning strategy in a simplified virtual and a real throwing task. J. Neurophysiol. 125, 43–62 (2020).
pubmed: 33146063
pmcid: 8087380
doi: 10.1152/jn.00197.2020
Bentivegna, D. C. Learning from Observation Using Primitives. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. School of Computer Science (2004).
Wolpert, D. & Kawato, M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5 (1998).
doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5
pubmed: 12662752
Guigon, E., Baraduc, P. & Desmurget, M. Computational motor control: Feedback and accuracy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 1003–1016 (2008).
pubmed: 18279368
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06028.x
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J. & Wolpert, D. M. Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2258 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nrn2258
pubmed: 18319728
pmcid: 2631351
Izawa, J. & Shadmehr, R. Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002012 (2011).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002012
Preatoni, E. et al. Movement variability and skills monitoring in sports. Sports Biomech. 12, 69–92 (2013).
pubmed: 23898682
doi: 10.1080/14763141.2012.738700
Maselli, A. et al. Where are you throwing the ball? I better watch your body, not just your arm!. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00505 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00505
pubmed: 29163094
pmcid: 5674933
Maselli, A. et al. A whole body characterization of individual strategies, gender differences, and common styles in overarm throwing. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 2486–2503. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00011.2019 (2019).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00011.2019
pubmed: 31577474
Cesqui, B., d’Avella, A., Portone, A. & Lacquaniti, F. Catching a ball at the right time and place: Individual factors matter. PLoS ONE 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031770 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031770
Cesqui, B., Russo, M., Lacquaniti, F. & d’Avella, A. Grasping in one-handed catching in relation to performance. PLoS ONE 11, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158606 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158606
Dhawale, A. K., Smith, M. A. & Ölveczky, B. P. The role of variability in motor learning. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 40, 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031548 (2017).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031548
pubmed: 28489490
pmcid: 6091866
Barto, A. G. Reinforcement learning control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 888–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(94)90138-4 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90138-4
pubmed: 7888773
Sugiyama, T., Schweighofer, N. & Izawa, J. Reinforcement learning establishes a minimal metacognitive process to monitor and control motor learning performance. Nat. Commun. 14, 3988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39536-9 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39536-9
pubmed: 37422476
pmcid: 10329706
Wu, H. G., Miyamoto, Y. R., Castro, L. N. G., Ölveczky, B. P. & Smith, M. A. Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3616 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nn.3616
pubmed: 24413700
pmcid: 4442489
Barbado Murillo, D., Caballero Sánchez, C., Moreside, J., Vera-García, F. J. & Moreno, F. J. Can the structure of motor variability predict learning rate?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 43, 596–607 (2017).
pubmed: 28095006
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000303
Singh, P., Jana, S., Ghosal, A. & Murthy, A. Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space variability facilitates supervised motor learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 14414–14419. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613383113 (2016).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613383113
pubmed: 27911808
pmcid: 5167208
Stergiou, N. & Decker, L. M. Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: Is there a connection?. Hum. Mov. Sci. 30, 869–888 (2011).
pubmed: 21802756
pmcid: 3183280
doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.002
Diedrichsen, J. & Kornysheva, K. Motor skill learning between selection and execution. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 227–233 (2015).
pubmed: 25746123
pmcid: 5617110
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.003
Heitz, R. P. The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Front. Neurosci. 8, 150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00150
pubmed: 24966810
pmcid: 4052662
Todorov, E. & Jordan, M. I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn963 (2002).
doi: 10.1038/nn963
pubmed: 12404008
Diedrichsen, J. Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr. Biol. 17, 1675–1679 (2007).
pubmed: 17900901
pmcid: 2230536
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.051
Wulf, G., McNevin, N. & Shea, C. H. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 54, 1143–1154 (2001).
doi: 10.1080/713756012
Yokoi, A., Hirashima, M. & Nozaki, D. Gain field encoding of the kinematics of both arms in the internal model enables flexible bimanual action. J. Neurosci. 31, 17058–17068 (2011).
pubmed: 22114275
pmcid: 6623869
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-11.2011
Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 262–269 (1992).
pubmed: 1402698
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S. & Quinn, J. T. Jr. Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol. Rev. 86, 415 (1979).
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.415
van Beers, R. J., Baraduc, P. & Wolpert, D. M. Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 357, 1137–1145 (2002).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1101
Latash, M. L. The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy). Exp. Brain Res. 217, 1–5 (2012).
pubmed: 22246105
pmcid: 3532046
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3000-4
Gera, G. et al. Motor abundance contributes to resolving multiple kinematic task constraints. Motor Control 14, 83–115 (2010).
pubmed: 20237405
doi: 10.1123/mcj.14.1.83
Yang, J.-F. & Scholz, J. P. Learning a throwing task is associated with differential changes in the use of motor abundance. Exp. Brain Res. 163, 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2149-x (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2149-x
pubmed: 15657698
Kimura, A., Nakashima, H. & Inaba, Y. Biomechanical role can vary depending on the conditions of the motor task. Hum. Mov. Sci. 92, 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2023.103150 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103150
pubmed: 37776752
Wang, C. & Shea, C. H. Bimanual control strategies. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 72, 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818781772 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/1747021818781772
Kennedy, D. M., Wang, C., Wang, Y. & Shea, C. H. The influence of accuracy constraints on bimanual and unimanual sequence learning. Neurosci. Lett. 751, 135812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135812 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135812
pubmed: 33705933
Mathew, J., de Rugy, A. & Danion, F. R. How optimal is bimanual tracking? the key role of hand coordination in space. J. Neurophysiol. 123, 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00119.2019 (2020).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00119.2019
pubmed: 31693447
Lederman, S. J. & Klatzky, R. L. Haptic perception: A tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71, 1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1439 (2009).
doi: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1439
pubmed: 19801605
Proske, U. & Gandevia, S. C. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol. Rev. 92, 1651–1697. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 (2012).
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00048.2011
pubmed: 23073629
Nowak, D. A., Glasauer, S. & Hermsdörfer, J. Force control in object manipulation-a model for the study of sensorimotor control strategies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1578–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.003 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.003
pubmed: 23791788
Dayan, E. & Cohen, L. G. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 72, 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008
pubmed: 22078504
pmcid: 3217208
Shadmehr, R. & Krakauer, J. W. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5
pubmed: 18251019
pmcid: 2553854
Gribble, P. L., Mullin, L. I., Cothros, N. & Mattar, A. Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2396–2405. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01020.2002 (2003).
doi: 10.1152/jn.01020.2002
pubmed: 12611935
Takiyama, K., Hirashima, M. & Nozaki, D. Prospective errors determine motor learning. Nat. Commun. 6, 5925 (2015).
pubmed: 25635628
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6925
Sainburg, R. L., Ghez, C. & Kalakanis, D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1045 (1999).
doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1045
pubmed: 10085332
Hogan, N. & Sternad, D. Dynamic primitives of motor behavior. Biol. Cybern. 106, 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0527-1 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00422-012-0527-1
pubmed: 23124919
pmcid: 3735361
Buchanan, J. J. & Kelso, J. A. S. To switch or not to switch: Recruitment of degrees of freedom stabilizes biological coordination. J. Motor Behav. 31, 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899909600984 (1999).
doi: 10.1080/00222899909600984
Fink, P. W., Kelso, J. A. S., Jirsa, V. K. & Guzman, G. D. Recruitment of degrees of freedom stabilizes coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.671 (2000).
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.671
pubmed: 10811169
Calvin, S., Milliex, L., Coyle, T. & Temprado, J.-J. Stabilization and destabilization of perception-action patterns influence the self-organized recruitment of degrees of freedom. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 1032 (2004).
pubmed: 15584813
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1032
Yamamoto, K., Shinya, M. & Kudo, K. The influence of attractor stability of intrinsic coordination patterns on the adaptation to new constraints. Sci. Rep. 10, 3058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60066-7 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60066-7
pubmed: 32080318
pmcid: 7033107
Bernstein, N. A. The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements: Conclusions Towards the Study of Motor Co-ordination, Biodynamics of Locomotion 1st English. (Pergamon Press, 1967).
Scott, S. H. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1427 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nrn1427
pubmed: 15208695
Krakauer, J. W., Hadjiosif, A. M., Xu, J., Wong, A. L. & Haith, A. M. Motor learning. Compr. Physiol. 9, 613–663 (2019).
pubmed: 30873583
doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170043
Bastian, A. J. Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21, 628–633 (2008).
pubmed: 18989103
pmcid: 2954436
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328315a293
O’Shea, H. & Redmond, S. J. A review of the neurobiomechanical processes underlying secure gripping in object manipulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 123, 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.007 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.007
pubmed: 33497782
Sobinov, A. R. & Bensmaia, S. J. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00528-7
pubmed: 34711956
pmcid: 9169115
Sainburg, R. L. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp. Brain Res. 142, 241–258 (2002).
pubmed: 11807578
doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0913-8
Saunders, J. A. & Knill, D. C. Visual feedback control of hand movements. J. Neurosci. 24, 3223–3234. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4319-03.2004 (2004).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4319-03.2004
pubmed: 15056701
pmcid: 6730029
Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J. & Flanagan, J. R. Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 739–751 (2011).
pubmed: 22033537
doi: 10.1038/nrn3112
Ernst, M. O. & Bülthoff, H. H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
pubmed: 15050512
Ronsse, R., Miall, R. C. & Swinnen, S. P. Multisensory integration in dynamical behaviors: Maximum likelihood estimation across bimanual skill learning. J. Neurosci. 29, 8419–8428. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5734-08.2009 (2009).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5734-08.2009
pubmed: 19571132
pmcid: 5116379
Sarlegna, F. R. & Sainburg, R. L. The Roles of Vision and Proprioception in the Planning of Reaching Movements 317–335 (Springer, 2009).
Camponogara, I. The integration of action-oriented multisensory information from target and limb within the movement planning and execution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 151, 105228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105228 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105228
pubmed: 37201591
Zschorlich, V. R., Behrendt, F. & de Lussanet, M. H. E. Multimodal sensorimotor integration of visual and kinaesthetic afferents modulates motor circuits in humans. Brain Sci. 11, 187 (2021).
pubmed: 33546384
pmcid: 7913510
doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020187
Chung, Y. G. et al. Adaptation of cortical activity to sustained pressure stimulation on the fingertip. BMC Neurosci. 16, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0207-x (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0207-x
pubmed: 26514637
pmcid: 4625848
Pfister, A., West, A. M., Bronner, S. & Noah, J. A. Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 38, 274–280. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2014.909540 (2014).
doi: 10.3109/03091902.2014.909540
pubmed: 24878252
Vicon Documentation. Upper Body Modeling with Plug-in Gait (2023). Online; Accessed 8 May 2021.
Ahmadi, A., Rowlands, D. & James, D. A. Towards a wearable device for skill assessment and skill acquisition of a tennis player during the first serve. Sports Technol. 2, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jst.112 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/jst.112
Elbrechter, C. Towards Anthropomorphic Robotic Paper Manipulation. Phd thesis, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Germany, Bielefeld, Germany (2020).
Maycock, J., Rohlig, T., Schroder, M., Botsch, M. & Ritter, H. Fully automatic optical motion tracking using an inverse kinematics approach. In 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363590 (2015).
Martin, M., Maycock, J., Schmidt, F. P. & Kramer, O. Recognition of manual actions using vector quantization and dynamic time warping. In Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems (eds Graña Romay, M. et al.) 221–228 (Springer, 2010).
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13769-3_27
Cuevas, E., Cienfuegos, M., Zaldévar, D. & Pérez-Cisneros, M. A swarm optimization algorithm inspired in the behavior of the social-spider. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 6374–6384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.041 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.041
Landlinger, J., Lindinger, S. J., Stöggl, T., Wagner, H. & Müller, E. Kinematic differences of elite and high-performance tennis players in the cross court and down the line forehand. Sports Biomech. 9, 280–295 (2010).
pubmed: 21309302
doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.535841
Wagner, H. et al. Upper-body kinematics in team-handball throw, tennis serve, and volleyball spike. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 24, 345–354 (2014).
pubmed: 22813080
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01503.x
Bessone, V., Höschele, N., Schwirtz, A. & Seiberl, W. Validation of a new inertial measurement unit system based on different dynamic movements for future in-field applications. Sports Biomech. 21, 685–700 (2022).
pubmed: 31718486
doi: 10.1080/14763141.2019.1671486
Yu, B., Gabriel, D., Noble, L. & An, K.-N. Estimate of the optimum cutoff frequency for the Butterworth low-pass digital filter. J. Appl. Biomech. 15, 318–329 (1999).
doi: 10.1123/jab.15.3.318
Robertson, D. G. E., Caldwell, G. E., Hamill, J., Kamen, G. & Whittlesey, S. Research Methods in Biomechanics 2nd edn. (Human kinetics, 2013).
Ferrari, A. et al. First in vivo assessment of “outwalk’’: A novel protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 48, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0544-y (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s11517-009-0544-y
pubmed: 19911215
Gupta, V., Chaurasia, V. & Shandilya, M. Random-valued impulse noise removal using adaptive dual threshold median filter. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 26, 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.10.004 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2014.10.004
Hu, M.-K. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 8, 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1962.1057692 (1962).
doi: 10.1109/TIT.1962.1057692
Cannata, G., Maggiali, M. & Rocha, J. Design of a tactile sensor for robot hands. Sens. Focus Tactile Force Stress Sens. 14, 271–288 (2008).