The influence of contrast media on calcium-based imaging of the spine in dual-layer CT.
Computed tomography
Contrast media
Dual-layer spectral CT
Virtual non-calcium
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 08 2024
14 08 2024
Historique:
received:
02
03
2024
accepted:
08
08
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of contrast media application on CT attenuation of the bone using a novel calcium-only imaging technique (VCa) from dual-layer spectral detector CT (DLCT), which enables CT-based bone mineral density measurement unimpeded by soft tissue components. For this, true non-contrast (TNC) and venous phase images (VP) of n = 97 patients were acquired. CT attenuation of the first lumbar vertebra (L1) was measured in TNC-VCa, VP-VCa, and in virtual non-contrast images (VNC). CT attenuation was significantly higher in VP-VCa than in TNC-VCa (p < 0.001), although regression analyses revealed a strong linear association between these measures (R
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143146
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69743-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69743-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18898Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
WHO. Guidelines for preclinical evaluation and clinical trials in osteoporosis (1998). https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42088/9241545224_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 17 Dec 2020).
Hadji, P. et al. The epidemiology of osteoporosis—Bone Evaluation Study (BEST): An analysis of routine health insurance data. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 110, 52–57 (2013).
pubmed: 23413388
pmcid: 3570954
Svedbom, A. et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: A compendium of country-specific reports. Arch. Osteoporos. 8, 137–137 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0137-0
pubmed: 24113838
pmcid: 3880492
Johnell, O. & Kanis, J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 16(Suppl 2), S3-7 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6
pubmed: 15365697
Lafata, J. E. et al. Improving osteoporosis screening: Results from a randomized cluster trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 22, 346–351 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0060-9
pubmed: 17356966
pmcid: 1824751
Morris, C. A. et al. Patterns of bone mineral density testing. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 19, 783–790 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30240.x
pubmed: 15209594
pmcid: 1492483
Compston, J. E., McClung, M. R. & Leslie, W. D. Osteoporosis. Lancet 393, 364–379 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3
pubmed: 30696576
Gausden, E. B., Nwachukwu, B. U., Schreiber, J. J., Lorich, D. G. & Lane, J. M. Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis screening and bone density assessment: A qualitative systematic review. J. Bone Jt Surg. 99, 1580–1590 (2017).
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00749
Adams, J. E. Quantitative computed tomography. Eur. J. Radiol. 71, 415–424 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.074
pubmed: 19682815
Murray, T. É., Williams, D. & Lee, M. J. Osteoporosis, obesity, and sarcopenia on abdominal CT: A review of epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for the reporting radiologist. Abdom. Radiol. 42, 2376–2386 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1124-5
Pickhardt, P. J. et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 588–595 (2013).
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003
pubmed: 23588747
pmcid: 3736840
Drinka, P. J., DeSmet, A. A., Bauwens, S. F. & Rogot, A. The effect of overlying calcification on lumbar bone densitometry. Calcif. Tissue Int. 50, 507–510 (1992).
doi: 10.1007/BF00582163
pubmed: 1525705
Link, T. M. Osteoporosis imaging: State of the art and advanced imaging. Radiology 263, 3–17 (2012).
doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110462
pubmed: 22438439
pmcid: 3309802
Peña, J. A. et al. Bone-marrow densitometry: Assessment of marrow space of human vertebrae by single energy high resolution-quantitative computed tomography. Med. Phys. 43, 4174–4183 (2016).
doi: 10.1118/1.4950874
pubmed: 27370137
Sfeir, J. G. et al. Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in volumetric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women using single- versus dual-energy quantitative computed tomography. Bone 112, 145–152 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.023
pubmed: 29704696
pmcid: 5970096
Borggrefe, J. et al. Association of osteolytic lesions, bone mineral loss and trabecular sclerosis with prevalent vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Radiol. 84, 2269–2274 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.024
pubmed: 26283192
Wait, J. M. S. et al. Performance evaluation of material decomposition with rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT and implications for assessing bone mineral density. Am. J. Roentgenol. 204, 1234–1241 (2015).
doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13093
Arentsen, L. et al. Use of dual-energy computed tomography to measure skeletal-wide marrow composition and cancellous bone mineral density. J. Bone Mineral Metab. 35, 428–436 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00774-016-0796-1
Cataño Jimenez, S., Saldarriaga, S., Chaput, C. D. & Giambini, H. Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes. Bone 130, 115100 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115100
pubmed: 31678491
Adams, J. E., Chen, S. Z., Adams, P. H. & Isherwood, I. Measurement of trabecular bone mineral by dual energy computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 6, 601–607 (1982).
doi: 10.1097/00004728-198206000-00028
pubmed: 7096705
Fredenberg, E. Spectral and dual-energy X-ray imaging for medical applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 878, 74–87 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.07.044
Do, T. D. et al. Quantitative calcium-based assessment of osteoporosis in dual-layer spectral CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 178, 111606 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111606
pubmed: 39018645
Pompe, E. et al. Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT. Eur. Radiol. 25, 283–289 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3408-2
pubmed: 25187384
Toelly, A. et al. Influence of contrast media on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from routine contrast-enhanced MDCT datasets using a phantom-less BMD measurement tool. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (RöFo) 189, 537–543 (2017).
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102941
Ding, Y., Richter, A., Stiller, W., Kauczor, H.-U. & Weber, T. F. Association between true non-contrast and virtual non-contrast vertebral bone CT attenuation values determined using dual-layer spectral detector CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 121, 108740 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108740
pubmed: 31733433
Romme, E. A. P. M. et al. Bone attenuation on routine chest CT correlates with bone mineral density on DXA in patients with COPD. J. Bone Mineral Res. 27, 2338–2343 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1678
Ohara, T. et al. Relationship between pulmonary emphysema and osteoporosis assessed by CT in patients with COPD. Chest 134, 1244–1249 (2008).
doi: 10.1378/chest.07-3054
pubmed: 18641115
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 30 Oct 2021).
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
McGraw, K. O. & Wong, S. P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol. Methods 1, 30–46 (1996).
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
Rosenthal, R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. In Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 6 (Sage Publications, 1991).
Field, A., Miles, J. & Field, Z. Discovering Statistics Using R (Sage, 2012).
Carpenter, J. & Bithell, J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: When, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat. Med. 19, 1141–1164 (2000).
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-F
pubmed: 10797513
Garner, H. W., Paturzo, M. M., Gaudier, G., Pickhardt, P. J. & Wessell, D. E. Variation in attenuation in L1 trabecular bone at different tube voltages: Caution is warranted when screening for osteoporosis with the use of opportunistic CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 208, 165–170 (2016).
doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16744
Gerety, E.-L. & Bearcroft, P. W. P. L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice. Br. J. Radiol. 91, 20170395 (2018).
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170395
pubmed: 29308913
pmcid: 5966006
Cropp, R. J., Seslija, P., Tso, D. & Thakur, Y. Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 14, 12 (2013).
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.4417
Giambini, H. et al. The effect of quantitative computed tomography acquisition protocols on bone mineral density estimation. J. Biomech. Eng. 137, 114502–114502 (2015).
doi: 10.1115/1.4031572
pubmed: 26355694
Vandenbroucke, J. P. et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 4, e297 (2007).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
pubmed: 17941715
pmcid: 2020496