Origin and evolution of the bread wheat D genome.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
15
11
2023
accepted:
10
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) is a globally dominant crop and major source of calories and proteins for the human diet. Compared with its wild ancestors, modern bread wheat shows lower genetic diversity, caused by polyploidisation, domestication and breeding bottlenecks
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143210
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07808-z
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07808-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dubcovsky, J. & Dvorak, J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316, 1862–1866 (2007).
pubmed: 17600208
pmcid: 4737438
doi: 10.1126/science.1143986
Zhou, Y. et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation. Nat. Genet. 52, 1412–1422 (2020).
pubmed: 33106631
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00722-w
Tadesse, W. et al. Genetic gains in wheat breeding and its role in feeding the world. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 1, e190005 (2019).
Marcussen, T. et al. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 345, 1250092 (2014).
pubmed: 25035499
doi: 10.1126/science.1250092
Wang, J. et al. Aegilops tauschii single nucleotide polymorphisms shed light on the origins of wheat D‐genome genetic diversity and pinpoint the geographic origin of hexaploid wheat. New Phytol. 198, 925–937 (2013).
pubmed: 23374069
doi: 10.1111/nph.12164
Zhao, X. et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives. Nat. Plants 9, 403–419 (2023).
pubmed: 36928772
doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01367-3
Gaut, B. S., Seymour, D. K., Liu, Q. & Zhou, Y. Demography and its effects on genomic variation in crop domestication. Nat. Plants 4, 512–520 (2018).
pubmed: 30061748
doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0210-1
Leal‐Bertioli, S. C. et al. Segmental allopolyploidy in action: increasing diversity through polyploid hybridization and homoeologous recombination. Am. J. Bot. 105, 1053–1066 (2018).
pubmed: 29985538
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1112
Cheng, H. et al. Frequent intra- and inter-species introgression shapes the landscape of genetic variation in bread wheat. Genome Biol. 20, 136 (2019).
pubmed: 31300020
pmcid: 6624984
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1744-x
He, F. et al. Exome sequencing highlights the role of wild-relative introgression in shaping the adaptive landscape of the wheat genome. Nat. Genet. 51, 1194–1194 (2019).
pubmed: 31197271
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0463-2
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).
pubmed: 33239791
pmcid: 7759465
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2961-x
Keilwagen, J. et al. Detecting major introgressions in wheat and their putative origins using coverage analysis. Sci. Rep. 12, 1908 (2022).
pubmed: 35115645
pmcid: 8813953
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05865-w
Ahmed, H. I. et al. Einkorn genomics sheds light on history of the oldest domesticated wheat. Nature 620, 830–838 (2023).
pubmed: 37532937
pmcid: 10447253
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06389-7
Gaurav, K. et al. Population genomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii identifies targets for bread wheat improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 422–431 (2022).
pubmed: 34725503
doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01058-4
Zhou, Y. et al. Introgressing the Aegilops tauschii genome into wheat as a basis for cereal improvement. Nat. Plants 7, 774–786 (2021).
pubmed: 34045708
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00934-w
Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
pubmed: 31406327
pmcid: 6776680
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0217-9
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4647–4654 (2021).
pubmed: 34320186
pmcid: 8476166
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
pubmed: 19815776
pmcid: 2858594
doi: 10.1126/science.1181369
Wang, L. et al. Aegilops tauschii genome assembly Aet v5.0 features greater sequence contiguity and improved annotation. G3 11, jkab325 (2021).
pubmed: 34515796
pmcid: 8664484
doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab325
Zhu, T. et al. Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly. Plant J. 107, 303–314 (2021).
pubmed: 33893684
pmcid: 8360199
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15289
Mizuno, N., Yamasaki, M., Matsuoka, Y., Kawahara, T. & Takumi, S. Population structure of wild wheat D‐genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii Coss.: implications for intraspecific lineage diversification and evolution of common wheat. Mol. Ecol. 19, 999–1013 (2010).
pubmed: 20149088
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04537.x
Savary, S. et al. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 430–439 (2019).
pubmed: 30718852
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y
Olson, E. L. et al. Simultaneous transfer, introgression, and genomic localization of genes for resistance to stem rust race TTKSK (Ug99) from Aegilops tauschii to wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 1179–1188 (2013).
pubmed: 23377571
doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2045-5
Periyannan, S. et al. The gene Sr33, an ortholog of barley Mla genes, encodes resistance to wheat stem rust race Ug99. Science 341, 786–788 (2013).
pubmed: 23811228
doi: 10.1126/science.1239028
Arora, S. et al. Resistance gene cloning from a wild crop relative by sequence capture and association genetics. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 139–143 (2019).
pubmed: 30718880
doi: 10.1038/s41587-018-0007-9
Boden, S. et al. Updated guidelines for gene nomenclature in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136, 72 (2023).
pubmed: 36952017
pmcid: 10036449
doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04253-w
Raupp, W., Brown-Guedira, G. & Gill, B. Cytogenetic and molecular mapping of the leaf rust resistance gene Lr39 in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102, 347–352 (2001).
doi: 10.1007/s001220051652
Singh, S. et al. Lr41, Lr39, and a leaf rust resistance gene from Aegilops cylindrica may be allelic and are located on wheat chromosome 2DS. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 586–591 (2004).
pubmed: 14534751
doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1477-8
Kolmer, J. A. & Fajolu, O. Virulence phenotypes of the wheat leaf rust pathogen, Puccinia triticina, in the United States from 2018 to 2020. Plant Dis. 106, 1723–1729 (2022).
pubmed: 34978866
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2321-RE
Athiyannan, N. Molecular Genetic Characterisation of Triple Rust Resistance in Aegilops tauschii. PhD thesis, Univ. of Queensland (2018).
Wang, Y. et al. An unusual tandem kinase fusion protein confers leaf rust resistance in wheat. Nat. Genet. 55, 914–920 (2023).
pubmed: 37217716
pmcid: 10260399
doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01401-2
Yu, G. et al. The wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr43 encodes an unusual protein kinase. Nat. Genet. 55, 921–926 (2023).
pubmed: 37217714
pmcid: 10260397
doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01402-1
Klymiuk, V., Coaker, G., Fahima, T. & Pozniak, C. J. Tandem protein kinases emerge as new regulators of plant immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 34, 1094–1102 (2021).
pubmed: 34096764
pmcid: 8761531
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-21-0073-CR
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022).
pubmed: 35288708
pmcid: 8920886
doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01022-1
Sansaloni, C. et al. Diversity analysis of 80,000 wheat accessions reveals consequences and opportunities of selection footprints. Nat. Commun. 11, 4572 (2020).
pubmed: 32917907
pmcid: 7486412
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18404-w
Beridze, R. K., Hanelt, P., Kandelaki, V. N., Sakvarelidze, I. M. & Schultze-Motel, J. A further mission to the Georgian SSR 1984 for collecting indigenous material of cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 33, 199–212 (1985).
doi: 10.1007/BF01997272
Rosyara, U. et al. Genetic contribution of synthetic hexaploid wheat to CIMMYT’s spring bread wheat breeding germplasm. Sci. Rep. 9, 12355 (2019).
pubmed: 31451719
pmcid: 6710277
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47936-5
Cheng, S. et al. Harnessing landrace diversity empowers wheat breeding. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07682-9 (2024).
Delorean, E. et al. High molecular weight glutenin gene diversity in Aegilops tauschii demonstrates unique origin of superior wheat quality. Commun. Biol. 4, 1242 (2021).
pubmed: 34725451
pmcid: 8560932
doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02563-7
Sato, K. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the transformation-amenable common wheat cultivar ‘Fielder’. DNA Res. 28, dsab008 (2021).
pubmed: 34254113
pmcid: 8320877
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsab008
Kale, S. M. et al. A catalogue of resistance gene homologs and a chromosome-scale reference sequence support resistance gene mapping in winter wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1730–1742 (2022).
pubmed: 35562859
pmcid: 9398310
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13843
Wang, Z. Y. et al. Helitron and CACTA DNA transposons actively reshape the common wheat-AK58 genome. Genomics 114, 110288 (2022).
pubmed: 35124171
doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110288
Guo, W. et al. Origin and adaptation to high altitude of Tibetan semi-wild wheat. Nat. Commun. 11, 5085 (2020).
pubmed: 33033250
pmcid: 7545183
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18738-5
Gonçalves-Dias, J., Singh, A., Graf, C. & Stetter, M. G. Genetic incompatibilities and evolutionary rescue by wild relatives shaped grain amaranth domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad177 (2023).
pubmed: 37552934
pmcid: 10439364
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad177
Weide, A., Riehl, S., Zeidi, M. & Conard, N. J. A systematic review of wild grass exploitation in relation to emerging cereal cultivation throughout the Epipalaeolithic and aceramic Neolithic of the Fertile Crescent. PLoS ONE 13, e0189811 (2018).
pubmed: 29293519
pmcid: 5749723
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189811
Singh, N. et al. Genomic analysis confirms population structure and identifies inter-lineage hybrids in Aegilops tauschii. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 9 (2019).
pubmed: 30740115
pmcid: 6357674
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00009
Abrouk, M. et al. Fonio millet genome unlocks African orphan crop diversity for agriculture in a changing climate. Nat. Commun. 11, 4488 (2020).
pubmed: 32901040
pmcid: 7479619
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18329-4
Thachuk, C. et al. Core Hunter: an algorithm for sampling genetic resources based on multiple genetic measures. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 243 (2009).
pubmed: 19660135
pmcid: 2734557
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-243
Driguez, P. et al. LeafGo: Leaf to Genome, a quick workflow to produce high-quality de novo plant genomes using long-read sequencing technology. Genome Biol. 22, 256 (2021).
pubmed: 34479618
pmcid: 8414726
doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02475-z
Cheng, H. Y., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X. W., Zhang, H. W. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
pubmed: 33526886
pmcid: 7961889
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5
Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075 (2013).
pubmed: 23422339
pmcid: 3624806
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086
Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 21, 245 (2020).
pubmed: 32928274
pmcid: 7488777
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9
Bankevich, A., Bzikadze, A. V., Kolmogorov, M., Antipov, D. & Pevzner, P. A. Multiplex de Bruijn graphs enable genome assembly from long, high-fidelity reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1075–1081 (2022).
pubmed: 35228706
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01220-6
Padmarasu, S., Himmelbach, A., Mascher, M. & Stein, N. in Plant Long Non-Coding RNAs: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 1933 (eds Chekanova, J. A. & Wang, H.-L. V.) 441–472 (Springer, 2019).
Himmelbach, A., Walde, I., Mascher, M. & Stein, N. Tethered chromosome conformation capture sequencing in Triticeae: a valuable tool for genome assembly. Bio Protoc. 8, e2955 (2018).
pubmed: 34395764
pmcid: 8328666
doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2955
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249
pmcid: 5846465
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).
pubmed: 28336562
pmcid: 5635820
doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).
pubmed: 27467250
pmcid: 5596920
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012
Alonge, M. et al. Automated assembly scaffolding using RagTag elevates a new tomato system for high-throughput genome editing. Genome Biol. 23, 258 (2022).
pubmed: 36522651
pmcid: 9753292
doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02823-7
Jain, C., Koren, S., Dilthey, A., Phillippy, A. M. & Aluru, S. A fast adaptive algorithm for computing whole-genome homology maps. Bioinformatics 34, i748–i756 (2018).
pubmed: 30423094
pmcid: 6129286
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty597
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
pubmed: 24695404
pmcid: 4103590
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
pubmed: 33590861
pmcid: 7931819
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008
Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom. Bioinformatics 3, lqaa108 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa108
Hoff, K. J., Lange, S., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. BRAKER1: unsupervised RNA-Seq-based genome annotation with GeneMark-ET and AUGUSTUS. Bioinformatics 32, 767–769 (2016).
pubmed: 26559507
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv661
Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. in Gene Prediction: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 1962 (ed. Kollmar, M.) 65–95 (Springer, 2019).
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
pubmed: 20003500
pmcid: 2803857
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
Blum, M. et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D344–D354 (2021).
pubmed: 33156333
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa977
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
pubmed: 24451626
pmcid: 3998142
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).
pubmed: 31727128
pmcid: 6857279
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y
Smit, A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0 http://www.repeatmasker.org (2015).
Contreras‐Moreira, B. et al. K‐mer counting and curated libraries drive efficient annotation of repeats in plant genomes. Plant Genome 14, e20143 (2021).
pubmed: 34562304
pmcid: 7614178
doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20143
Abrouk, M. et al. Chromosome-scale assembly of the wild wheat relative Aegilops umbellulata. Sci. Data 10, 739 (2023).
pubmed: 37880246
pmcid: 10600132
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02658-2
Shumate, A. & Salzberg, S. L. Liftoff: accurate mapping of gene annotations. Bioinformatics 37, 1639–1643 (2021).
pubmed: 33320174
pmcid: 8289374
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1016
Pertea, G. & Pertea, M. GFF utilities: GffRead and GffCompare. F1000Research 9, 304 (2020).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23297.1
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).
pubmed: 33828273
pmcid: 8026399
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
pubmed: 32015543
pmcid: 7056644
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Waskom, M. L. Seaborn: statistical data visualization. J. Op. Source Softw. 6, 3021 (2021).
doi: 10.21105/joss.03021
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 (2013).
Cook, D. E. & Andersen, E. C. VCF-kit: assorted utilities for the variant call format. Bioinformatics 33, 1581–1582 (2017).
pubmed: 28093408
pmcid: 5423453
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx011
Gain, C. & François, O. LEA 3: Factor models in population genetics and ecological genomics with R. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 2738–2748 (2021).
pubmed: 33638893
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13366
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
pubmed: 21653522
pmcid: 3137218
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
Wei, F., Wing, R. A. & Wise, R. P. Genome dynamics and evolution of the Mla (powdery mildew) resistance locus in barley. Plant Cell 14, 1903–1917 (2002).
pubmed: 12172030
pmcid: 151473
doi: 10.1105/tpc.002238
Stecher, G., Tamura, K. & Kumar, S. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1237–1239 (2020).
pubmed: 31904846
pmcid: 7086165
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz312
Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027 (2021).
pubmed: 33892491
pmcid: 8233496
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120
Kolmer, J., Bajgain, P., Rouse, M., Li, J. & Zhang, P. Mapping and characterization of the recessive leaf rust resistance gene Lr83 on wheat chromosome arm 1DS. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136, 115 (2023).
pubmed: 37083869
doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04361-7
Long, D. & Kolmer, J. A North American system of nomenclature for Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology 79, 525–529 (1989).
doi: 10.1094/Phyto-79-525
Wang, S. et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high‐density 90,000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 787–796 (2014).
pubmed: 24646323
pmcid: 4265271
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12183
Pestsova, E., Ganal, M. & Röder, M. Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome 43, 689–697 (2000).
pubmed: 10984182
doi: 10.1139/g00-042
Heffelfinger, C., Fragoso, C. A. & Lorieux, M. Constructing linkage maps in the genomics era with MapDisto 2.0. Bioinformatics 33, 2224–2225 (2017).
pubmed: 28369214
pmcid: 5870660
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx177
Voorrips, R. E. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Heredity 93, 77–78 (2002).
doi: 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
Lück, S. et al. siRNA-Finder (si-Fi) software for RNAi-target design and off-target prediction. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1023 (2019).
pubmed: 31475020
pmcid: 6704232
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01023
Barnes, C. W. & Szabo, L. J. Detection and identification of four common rust pathogens of cereals and grasses using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 97, 717–727 (2007).
pubmed: 18943603
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-6-0717
Chang, Q. et al. A unique invertase is important for sugar absorption of an obligate biotrophic pathogen during infection. New Phytol. 215, 1548–1561 (2017).
pubmed: 28744865
doi: 10.1111/nph.14666
Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).
pubmed: 21217122
pmcid: 3051319
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011
Kokot, M., Długosz, M. & Deorowicz, S. KMC 3: counting and manipulating k-mer statistics. Bioinformatics 33, 2759–2761 (2017).
pubmed: 28472236
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx304
Gel, B. & Serra, E. karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Bioinformatics 33, 3088–3090 (2017).
pubmed: 28575171
pmcid: 5870550
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx346
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. Population genomics of the wild wheat Aegilops tauschii (Open wild wheat consortium phase II) [Dataset]. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vmcvdnd0d (2024).
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. k-mer matrix Aegilops tauschii diversity panel (Open wild wheat consortium phase II) Part 3/3 [Dataset]. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wm37pvmvd (2024).
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. k-mer matrix Aegilops tauschii diversity panel (Open wild wheat consortium phase II) Part 2/3 [Dataset]. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbvm (2024).
Cavalet-Giorsa, E. et al. k-mer matrix Aegilops tauschii diversity panel (Open wild wheat consortium phase II) Part 1/3 [Dataset]. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p5hqbzkvx (2024).