Precision spectroscopy on
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
04
04
2024
accepted:
05
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Many powerful tests of the standard model of particle physics and searches for new physics with precision atomic spectroscopy are hindered by our lack of knowledge of nuclear properties. Ideally, these properties may be derived from precise measurements of the most sensitive and theoretically best-understood observables, often found in hydrogen-like systems. Although these measurements are abundant for the electric properties of nuclei, they are scarce for the magnetic properties, and precise experimental results are limited to the lightest of nuclei
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143212
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07795-1
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07795-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Hellwig, H. et al. Measurement of the unperturbed hydrogen hyperfine transition frequency. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 19, 200–209 (1970).
doi: 10.1109/TIM.1970.4313902
Wineland, D. J. & Ramsey, N. F. Atomic deuterium maser. Phys. Rev. A 5, 821–837 (1972).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.5.821
Mathur, B. S., Crampton, S. B., Kleppner, D. & Ramsey, N. F. Hyperfine separation of tritium. Phys. Rev. 158, 14–17 (1967).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.158.14
Schneider, A. et al. Direct measurement of the
pubmed: 35676477
pmcid: 9242863
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04761-7
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J. & Itano, W. M. Laser-fluorescence mass spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 628–631 (1983).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.628
Bezginov, N. et al. A measurement of the atomic hydrogen lamb shift and the proton charge radius. Science 365, 1007–1012 (2019).
pubmed: 31488684
doi: 10.1126/science.aau7807
Antognini, A. et al. Proton structure from the measurement of 2S-2P transition frequencies of muonic hydrogen. Science 339, 417–420 (2013).
pubmed: 23349284
doi: 10.1126/science.1230016
Pohl, R. et al. Laser spectroscopy of muonic deuterium. Science 353, 669–673 (2016).
pubmed: 27516595
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2468
Beyer, A. et al. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 358, 79–85 (2017).
pubmed: 28983046
doi: 10.1126/science.aah6677
Gao, H. & Vanderhaeghen, M. The proton charge radius. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015002 (2022).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015002
Karshenboim, S. G. Precision physics of simple atoms: QED tests, nuclear structure and fundamental constants. Phys. Rep. 422, 1–63 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.008
Patkóš, V., Yerokhin, V. A. & Pachucki, K. Higher-order QED corrections to the hyperfine splitting in
pubmed: 37977610
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.183001
Skripnikov, L. V. et al. New nuclear magnetic moment of
pubmed: 29547322
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.093001
Shabaev, V. M. et al. Calculation of the hyperfine structure of heavy H and Li like ions. Hyperfine Interact. 127, 279–286 (2000).
doi: 10.1023/A:1012616322709
Stone, N. Table of Recommended Nuclear Magnetic Dipole Moments. Report No. INDC(NDS)-0794 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2019).
Farooq, M. et al. Absolute magnetometry with
pubmed: 32567926
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.223001
Crespo López-Urrutia, J. R., Beiersdorfer, P., Savin, D. W. & Widmann, K. Direct observation of the spontaneous emission of the hyperfine transition F = 4 to F = 3 in ground state hydrogenlike
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.826
Fella, V. et al. Magnetic moment of
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013368
Ullmann, J. et al. High precision hyperfine measurements in Bismuth challenge bound-state strong-field QED. Nat. Commun. 8, 15484 (2017).
pubmed: 28508892
pmcid: 5440849
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15484
Wehrli, D., Spyszkiewicz-Kaczmarek, A., Puchalski, M. & Pachucki, K. QED effect on the nuclear magnetic shielding of
pubmed: 35029494
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.263001
Pachucki, K. Nuclear mass and size corrections to the magnetic shielding. Phys. Rev. A 108, 062806 (2023).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.062806
Pachucki, K. & Puchalski, M. Accurate determination of Be magnetic moment. Opt. Commun. 283, 641–643 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2009.10.058
Wang, M., Huang, W., Kondev, F., Audi, G. & Naimi, S. The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Chin. Phys. C 45, 030003 (2021).
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf
Gabrielse, G. Why is sideband mass spectrometry possible with ions in a Penning trap? Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 172501 (2009).
pubmed: 19518777
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.172501
Wineland, D. J. & Dehmelt, H. G. Principles of the stored ion calorimeter. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 919–930 (1975).
doi: 10.1063/1.321602
Cornell, E. A., Weisskoff, R. M., Boyce, K. R. & Pritchard, D. E. Mode coupling in a Penning trap: π pulses and a classical avoided crossing. Phys. Rev. A 41, 312–315 (1990).
pubmed: 9902871
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.312
Dehmelt, H. Continuous Stern–Gerlach effect: principle and idealized apparatus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2291–2294 (1986).
pubmed: 16593681
pmcid: 323282
doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2291
Häffner, H. et al. High-accuracy measurement of the magnetic moment anomaly of the electron bound in hydrogenlike carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5308–5311 (2000).
pubmed: 11135983
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5308
Moskovkin, D. L. & Shabaev, V. M. Zeeman effect of the hyperfine-structure levels in hydrogenlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 73, 052506 (2006).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.052506
Faustov, R. Magnetic moment of the hydrogen atom. Phys. Lett. B 33, 422–424 (1970).
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(70)90621-0
Tiesinga, E., Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B. & Taylor, B. N. Codata recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021).
pubmed: 36733295
pmcid: 9890581
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
Schneider, G. et al. Double-trap measurement of the proton magnetic moment at 0.3 parts per billion precision. Science 358, 1081–1084 (2017).
pubmed: 29170238
doi: 10.1126/science.aan0207
Pachucki, K., Patkóš, V. & Yerokhin, V. A. Accurate determination of
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138189
Shabaev, V. M., Glazov, D. A., Malyshev, A. V. & Tupitsyn, I. I. Recoil effect on the g factor of Li-like ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263001 (2017).
pubmed: 29328712
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.263001
Wehrli, D., Puchalski, M. & Pachucki, K. QED theory of the nuclear magnetic shielding in H and
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032808
Puchalski, M. & Pachucki, K. Ground-state hyperfine splitting in the Be
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.032510
Sun, W. et al. Measurement of hyperfine structure and the Zemach radius in
pubmed: 37739370
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.103002
Pachucki, K., Patkóš, Vcv & Yerokhin, V. A. Hyperfine splitting in
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.052802
Fermi, E. Über die magnetischen momente der atomkerne. Z. Phys. 60, 320–333 (1930).
doi: 10.1007/BF01339933
Volotka, A. V. et al. Test of many-electron QED effects in the hyperfine splitting of heavy high-Z ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 073001 (2012).
pubmed: 22401198
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.073001
Yerokhin, V. A. Hyperfine structure of Li and Be
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012513
Puchalski, M. & Pachucki, K. Ground state hyperfine splitting in
pubmed: 24483650
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.243001
Shiga, N., Itano, W. M. & Bollinger, J. J. Diamagnetic correction to the
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.012510
Qi, X.-Q. et al. Theoretical hyperfine splittings of
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.L010802
Kramida, A. E. Critical compilation of wavelengths and energy levels of singly ionized beryllium (Be II). Phys. Scr. 72, 309–319 (2005).
doi: 10.1238/Physica.Regular.072a00309
Drake, G. W. F. Theoretical energies for the n = 1 and 2 states of the helium isoelectronic sequence up to Z = 100. Can. J. Phys. 66, 586–611 (1988).
doi: 10.1139/p88-100
Beigang, R., Schmidt, D. & West, P. Laserspectroscopy of high Rydberg states of light alkaline-earth elements: Be and Mg. J. Phys. Colloq. 44, C7-229–C7-237 (1983).
doi: 10.1051/jphyscol:1983719
Debierre, V., Keitel, C. H. & Harman, Z. Fifth-force search with the bound-electron g factor. Phys. Lett. B 807, 135527 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135527
Guan, H. et al. Probing atomic and nuclear properties with precision spectroscopy of fine and hyperfine structures in the
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.030801
Morgner, J. et al. Stringent test of QED with hydrogen-like tin. Nature 622, 53–57 (2023).
pubmed: 37794267
pmcid: 10550826
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06453-2