Non-therapeutic laparotomies in military trauma (2009-2014).
Combat trauma
Exploratory laparotomy
Military
Non-therapeutic laparotomy
Surgical site infections
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
10
04
2024
accepted:
15
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Combat casualties are frequently injured in austere settings where modern imaging modalities are unavailable. Exploratory laparotomies are often performed in these settings when there is suspicion for intra-abdominal injury. Prior studies of combat casualties reported non-therapeutic laparotomy (NTL) rates as high as 32%. Given improvements in combat casualty care over time, we evaluated NTLs performed during later years of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Military personnel with combat-related injuries (6/1/2009-12/31/2014) who underwent exploratory laparotomy based on concern for abdominal injury (i.e. not performed for proximal vascular control or fecal diversion) and were evacuated to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (Germany) before being transferred to participating U.S. military hospitals were assessed. An NTL was defined as a negative laparotomy without substantial intra-abdominal injuries requiring repair. Characteristics, indications for laparotomy, operative findings, and outcomes were examined. Among 244 patients who underwent laparotomies, 41 (16.8%) had NTLs and 203 (83.2%) had therapeutic laparotomies (i.e. positive findings). Patients with NTLs had more computed tomography scans concerning for injury (48.8% vs 27.1%; p = 0.006), less penetrating injury mechanisms (43.9% vs 71.9%; p < 0.001), and lower Injury Severity Scores (26 vs 33; p = 0.003) compared to patients with therapeutic laparotomies. Patients with NTLs were also less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (70.7 vs 89.2% for patients with therapeutic laparotomies; p = 0.007). No patients with NTLs developed abdominal surgical site infections (SSI) compared to 16.7% of patients with therapeutic laparotomies (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in mortality between the groups (p = 0.198). Our proportion of NTLs was lower than reported from earlier years during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. No infectious complications from NTLs (i.e. abdominal SSIs) were identified. Nevertheless, surgeons should continue to have a low threshold for exploratory laparotomy in military patients in austere settings with concern for intra-abdominal injury.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Combat casualties are frequently injured in austere settings where modern imaging modalities are unavailable. Exploratory laparotomies are often performed in these settings when there is suspicion for intra-abdominal injury. Prior studies of combat casualties reported non-therapeutic laparotomy (NTL) rates as high as 32%. Given improvements in combat casualty care over time, we evaluated NTLs performed during later years of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
METHODS
METHODS
Military personnel with combat-related injuries (6/1/2009-12/31/2014) who underwent exploratory laparotomy based on concern for abdominal injury (i.e. not performed for proximal vascular control or fecal diversion) and were evacuated to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (Germany) before being transferred to participating U.S. military hospitals were assessed. An NTL was defined as a negative laparotomy without substantial intra-abdominal injuries requiring repair. Characteristics, indications for laparotomy, operative findings, and outcomes were examined.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 244 patients who underwent laparotomies, 41 (16.8%) had NTLs and 203 (83.2%) had therapeutic laparotomies (i.e. positive findings). Patients with NTLs had more computed tomography scans concerning for injury (48.8% vs 27.1%; p = 0.006), less penetrating injury mechanisms (43.9% vs 71.9%; p < 0.001), and lower Injury Severity Scores (26 vs 33; p = 0.003) compared to patients with therapeutic laparotomies. Patients with NTLs were also less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (70.7 vs 89.2% for patients with therapeutic laparotomies; p = 0.007). No patients with NTLs developed abdominal surgical site infections (SSI) compared to 16.7% of patients with therapeutic laparotomies (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in mortality between the groups (p = 0.198).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our proportion of NTLs was lower than reported from earlier years during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. No infectious complications from NTLs (i.e. abdominal SSIs) were identified. Nevertheless, surgeons should continue to have a low threshold for exploratory laparotomy in military patients in austere settings with concern for intra-abdominal injury.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143330
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11102-4
pii: 10.1007/s00464-024-11102-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
ID : Y1-AI-5072
Organisme : Defense Health Program
ID : HU0001190002
Organisme : Wounded, Ill and Injured Program, Department of Navy
ID : HU0001-10-1-0014
Informations de copyright
© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Mitchell TA, Hutchison T, Becker TE, Aden JK, Blackbourne L, White CE (2014) Nontherapeutic laparotomy in American combat casualties: a 10-year review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77:S171–S175. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000367
doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000367
pubmed: 25159351
Morrison JJ, Poon H, Garner J, Midwinter MJ, Jansen JO (2012) Nontherapeutic laparotomy in combat casualties. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:S479–S482. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318275471f
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318275471f
pubmed: 23192073
Tribble DR, Conger NG, Fraser S, Gleeson TD, Wilkins K, Antonille T, Weintrob A, Ganesan A, Gaskins LJ, Li P, Grandits G, Landrum ML, Hospenthal DR, Millar EV, Blackbourne LH, Dunne JR, Craft D, Mende K, Wortmann GW, Herlihy R, McDonald J, Murray CK (2011) Infection-associated clinical outcomes in hospitalized medical evacuees after traumatic injury: Trauma Infectious Disease Outcome Study. J Trauma 71:S33-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318221162e
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318221162e
pubmed: 21795875
pmcid: 4265636
Tribble DR, Murray CK, Lloyd BA, Ganesan A, Mende K, Blyth DM, Petfield JL, Mcdonald JR (2019) After the battlefield: infectious complications among wounded warriors in the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study. Mil Med 184:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz027
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz027
pubmed: 31778199
pmcid: 6886670
Eastridge BJ, Jenkins D, Flaherty S, Schiller H, Holcomb JB (2006) Trauma system development in a theater of war: Experiences from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Trauma 61:1366–1372. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000245894.78941.90
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000245894.78941.90
pubmed: 17159678
Tribble DR, Spott MA, Shackleford SA, Gurney JM, Murray CK (2022) Department of Defense Trauma Registry Infectious Disease Module impact on clinical practice. Mil Med 187:7–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac050
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac050
pubmed: 35512379
pmcid: 9071513
Hathaway E, Glaser J, Cardarelli C, Dunne J, Elster E, Safford S, Rodriguez C (2016) Exploratory laparotomy for proximal vascular control in combat-related injuries. Mil Med 181:247–252. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-15-00155
doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-15-00155
pubmed: 27168580
Nessen SC, Gurney J, Rasmussen TE, Cap AP, Mann-Salinas E, Le TD, Shackelford S, Remick KN, Akers K, Eastridge B, Jenkins D, Stockinger Z, Murray CK, Gross K, Seery J, Mabry R, Holcomb JB (2018) Unrealized Potential of the US Military battlefield trauma system: DOW rate is higher in Iraq and Afghanistan than in Vietnam, but CFR and KIA rate are lower. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 85:S4-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001969
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001969
pubmed: 29787556
Haan J, Kole K, Brunetti A, Kramer M, Scalea TM (2003) Nontherapeutic laparotomies revisited. Am Surg 69:562–565
doi: 10.1177/000313480306900703
pubmed: 12889616
Schnüriger B, Lam L, Inaba K, Kobayashi L, Barbarino R, Demetriades D (2012) Negative laparotomy in trauma: are we getting better? Am Surg 78:1219–1223
doi: 10.1177/000313481207801128
pubmed: 23089438
Ball CG (2014) Current management of penetrating torso trauma: nontherapeutic is not good enough anymore. Can J Surg 57:E36-43. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.026012
doi: 10.1503/cjs.026012
pubmed: 24666458
pmcid: 3968212
Bentin JM, Possfelt-Møller E, Svenningsen P, Rudolph SS, Sillesen M (2022) A characterization of trauma laparotomies in a scandinavian setting: an observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 30:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01030-4
doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01030-4
pubmed: 35804389
pmcid: 9264678
Velmahos GC, Constantinou C, Tillou A, Brown CV, Salim A, Demetriades D (2005) Abdominal computed tomographic scan for patients with gunshot wounds to the abdomen selected for nonoperative management. J Trauma 59:1155–1160. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000196435.18073.6d
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196435.18073.6d
pubmed: 16385294
Nishijima DK, Simel DL, Wisner DH, Holmes JF (2012) Does this adult patient have a blunt intra-abdominal injury? JAMA 307:1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.422
doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.422
pubmed: 22496266
pmcid: 4966670
Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Chiu WC, Killeen KL, Hogan GJ, Scalea TM (2004) Penetrating torso trauma: triple-contrast helical CT in peritoneal violation and organ injury–a prospective study in 200 patients. Radiology 231:775–784. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2313030126
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030126
pubmed: 15105455
Morrison JJ, Clasper JC, Gibb I, Midwinter M (2011) Management of penetrating abdominal trauma in the conflict environment: the role of computed tomography scanning. World J Surg 35:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0782-z
doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0782-z
pubmed: 20845038
Smith IM, Naumann DN, Marsden ME, Ballard M, Bowley DM (2015) Scanning and war: utility of FAST and CT in the assessment of battlefield abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 262:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001002
doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001002
pubmed: 25405557
Bai Z, Wang B, Tian J, Tong Z, Lu H, Qi X (2021) Diagnostic utility of CT for abdominal injury in the military setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 100:e28150. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000028150
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000028150
pubmed: 34918669
Moas V, Eskridge S, Clouser M, Kurapaty S, Dyke C, Souza J (2020) Incisional hernia incidence following laparotomy for combat trauma: Investigating 15 years of US war surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 89:S200–S206. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002769
doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002769
pubmed: 32345894