Factors influencing nurse practitioner panel size in team-based primary care: a qualitative case study.
Case study
Nurse practitioner
Panel size
Primary care
Social determinants
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
30
12
2023
accepted:
29
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lack of access to health care is a worldwide public health crisis. In primary care it has led to increases in the implementation of nurse practitioners and heightened interest in their patient panel capacity. The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing nurse practitioner patient panel size in team-based primary care in Ontario, Canada. We used a multiple case study design. Eight team-based primary care practices including rural and urban settings were purposively selected as cases. Each case had two or more nurse practitioners with a minimum of two years experience in the primary care setting. Interviews were conducted in-person, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using content analysis. Forty participants, including 19 nurse practitioners, 16 administrators (inclusive of executives, managers, and receptionists), and 5 physicians were interviewed. Patient, provider, organizational, and system factors influenced nurse practitioner patient panel size. There were eight sub-factors: complexity of patients' health and social needs; holistic nursing model of care; nurse practitioner experience and confidence; composition and functioning of the multidisciplinary team; clerical and administrative supports, and nurse practitioner activities and expectations. All participants found it difficult to identify the panel size of nurse practitioners, calling it- "a grey area." Establishing and maintaining a longitudinal relationship that responded holistically to patients' needs was fundamental to how nurse practitioners provided care. Social factors such as gender, poverty, mental health concerns, historical trauma, marginalisation and literacy contributed to the complexity of patients' needs. Participants indicated NPs tried to address all of a patient's concerns at each visit. Nurse practitioners have a holistic approach that incorporates attention to the social determinants of health as well as acute and chronic comorbidities. This approach compels them to try to address all of the needs a patient is experiencing at each visit and reduces their panel size. Multidisciplinary teams have an opportunity to be deliberate when structuring their services across providers to meet more of the health and social needs of empanelled patients. This could enable increases in nurse practitioner panel size.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lack of access to health care is a worldwide public health crisis. In primary care it has led to increases in the implementation of nurse practitioners and heightened interest in their patient panel capacity. The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing nurse practitioner patient panel size in team-based primary care in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS
METHODS
We used a multiple case study design. Eight team-based primary care practices including rural and urban settings were purposively selected as cases. Each case had two or more nurse practitioners with a minimum of two years experience in the primary care setting. Interviews were conducted in-person, audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using content analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty participants, including 19 nurse practitioners, 16 administrators (inclusive of executives, managers, and receptionists), and 5 physicians were interviewed. Patient, provider, organizational, and system factors influenced nurse practitioner patient panel size. There were eight sub-factors: complexity of patients' health and social needs; holistic nursing model of care; nurse practitioner experience and confidence; composition and functioning of the multidisciplinary team; clerical and administrative supports, and nurse practitioner activities and expectations. All participants found it difficult to identify the panel size of nurse practitioners, calling it- "a grey area." Establishing and maintaining a longitudinal relationship that responded holistically to patients' needs was fundamental to how nurse practitioners provided care. Social factors such as gender, poverty, mental health concerns, historical trauma, marginalisation and literacy contributed to the complexity of patients' needs. Participants indicated NPs tried to address all of a patient's concerns at each visit.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Nurse practitioners have a holistic approach that incorporates attention to the social determinants of health as well as acute and chronic comorbidities. This approach compels them to try to address all of the needs a patient is experiencing at each visit and reduces their panel size. Multidisciplinary teams have an opportunity to be deliberate when structuring their services across providers to meet more of the health and social needs of empanelled patients. This could enable increases in nurse practitioner panel size.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143488
doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02547-6
pii: 10.1186/s12875-024-02547-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
304Subventions
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : 06695
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Maier CB, Kroezen M, Busse R, Wismar M, editors. Skill-mix innovation, effectiveness and implementation: improving primary and chronic care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. pp. 1–410. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/m/skill-mix-innovation-effectiveness-and-implementation-improving-primary-and-chronic-care .
Maier CB, Aiken LH. Task shifting from physicians to nurses in primary care in 39 countries: a cross-country comparative study. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26:927–34.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw098
pubmed: 27485719
International Council of Nurses. Guidelines on advanced practice nursing. 2020:1–39. https://www.icn.ch/system/files/documents/2020-04/ICN_APN%20Report_EN_WEB.pdf
Harrington C. Considerations for patient panel size. Dela J Public Health. 2022;8:154–7. https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2022.12.034 .
doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.12.034
pubmed: 36751598
pmcid: 9894066
Dai M, Ingham RC, Peterson LE. Scope of practice and patient panel size of family physicians who work with nurse practitioners or physician assistants. Fam Med. 2019;51:311–8.
doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.438954
pubmed: 30973618
Mayo-Smith MF, Robbins RA, Murray M, Weber R, Bagley PJ, Vitale EJ, Paige NM. Analysis of variation in organizational definitions of primary care panels: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e227497. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7497 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7497
pubmed: 35426924
pmcid: 9012968
Paige NM, Apaydin EA, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Mak S, Miake-Lye IM, Begashaw MM, Severin JM, Shekelle PG. What is the optimal primary care panel size? A systematic review. Ann Med. 2020;172:195–201.
Muldoon L, Dahrouge S, Russell G, Hogg W, Ward N. How many patients should a family physician have? Factors to consider in answering a deceptively simple question. Healthc Policy. 2012;7:26–34.
pubmed: 23634160
pmcid: 3359082
Martin-Misener R, Kilpatrick K, Donald F, Bryant-Lukosius D, Rayner J, Valaitis R, Carter N, Miller PA, Landry V, Harbman P, Charbonneau-Smith R, McKinlay RJ, Ziegler E, Boesveld S, Lamb A. NP caseload in primary health care: scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;62:170–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.019
pubmed: 27494430
Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:166–71.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1616
pubmed: 24615313
pmcid: 3948764
Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, McDaniel RR. Small primary care practices face four hurdles—including a physician-centric mind-set—in becoming medical homes. Health Aff. 2012;31:2417–22.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0974
Wagner EH, Coleman K, Reid RJ, Phillips K, Abrams MK, Sugarman JR. The changes involved in patient-centered medical home transformation. Prim Care. 2012;39:241–59.
doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.03.002
pubmed: 22608865
Venning P, Durie A, Roland M, Roberts C, Leese B. Randomised controlled trial comparing cost effectiveness of general practitioners and nurse practitioners in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320:1048–53.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1048
pubmed: 10764367
pmcid: 27348
Maier CB, Barnes H, Aiken LH, Busse R. Descriptive, cross-country analysis of the nurse practitioner workforce in six countries: size, growth, physician substitution potential. BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e011901. Erratum in: BMJ Open. 2016; 6: e011901corr1.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Nurse practitioners. 2023; https://www.cihi.ca/en/nurse-practitioners
Kaasalainen S, Martin-Misener R, Kilpatrick K, Harbman P, Bryant-Lukosius D, Donald F, Carter N, Kioke S. DiCenso A. An historical overview of the development of advanced practice nursing roles in Canada. CJNL. 2010;23(SI):35–60.
doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2010.22268
Martin-Misener R, Wong S, Johnston S, Blackman S, Scott C, Hogg W, Burge F, Grool AM, Campbell J, Wuite S. Regional variation in primary care innovations and policy: considering qualitative contextual data for performance measurement in three Canadian provinces. BMJ Open. 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029622 .
McLeod L, Buckley G, Sweetman A. Ontario primary care models: a descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 2016;4:E679–88. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160069 .
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160069
pubmed: 28018882
pmcid: 5173461
Somé NH, Devlin RA, Mehta N, Zaric GS, Sarma S. Team-based primary care practice and physician’s services: Evidence from Family Health Teams in Ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2020;264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113310 .
Dahrouge S, Muldoon L, Ward N, Hogg W, Russell G, Taylor-Sussex R. Roles of NPs and family physicians in community health centres. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:1020–7.
pubmed: 25551130
pmcid: 4229163
Creswell J. Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2014. 3rd edition. Toronto: Sage Publications.
Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.
Elo S, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–15.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
pubmed: 18352969
QRS International Pty Ltd. NVivo 12. https://support.qsrinternational.com/s/
Neale J, Miller P, West R. Reporting quantitative information in qualitative research: Guidance for authors and reviewers. Addiction. 2014;109:175–6.
doi: 10.1111/add.12408
pubmed: 24422609
Moody E, Martin-Misener R, Baxter L, Boulos L, Burge F, Christian E, Condran B, MacKenzie A, Michael E, Packer T, Peacock K, Sampalli T, Warner G. Patient perspectives on primary care for multimorbidity: an integrative review. Health Expect. 2022;25:2614–27.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13568
pubmed: 36073315
pmcid: 9700181
Tadeu ACR, Silva Caetano E, de Figueiredo IRC, I J, Santiago LM. Multimorbidity and consultation time: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5
pubmed: 32723303
pmcid: 7390198
Fraze TK, Briggs ADM, Whitcomb EK, Peck KA, Meara E. Role of nurse practitioners in caring for patients with complex health needs. Med Care. 2020;58:853–60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01219-5
pubmed: 32925414
pmcid: 7552908
Anderman A, for the CLEAR Collaboration. Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. CMAJ. 2016;188:E474–83.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160177
Moreno-Juste A, Gimeno-Miguel A, Poblador-Plou B, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Cano Del Pozo M, Forjaz MJ, Prados-Torres A, Gimeno-Feliú LA. Multimorbidity, social determinants and intersectionality in chronic patients. Results from the EpiChron Cohort. J Glob Health. 2023. 0.7189/13.04014.
Cody R, Gysin S, Merlo C, Gemperli A, Essig S. Complexity as a factor for task allocation among general practitioners and nurse practitioners: a narrative review. BMC Fam Prac. 2020;21:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-1089-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1089-2
Morgan PA, Smith VA, Berkowitz TSZ, Edelman D, Van Houtven CH, Woolson SL, Hendrix CC, Everett C, White BS, Jackson GL. Impact of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician utilization for outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery among advanced practice assistants on utilization and costs for complex patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38:1028–36. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00014 .
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00014
pubmed: 31158006
Virani SS, Akeroyd JM, Ramsey DJ, Deswal A, Nasir K, Rajan SS, Ballantyne CM, Petersen LA. Health care resource providers and physician providers in primary care. Popul Health Manag. 2018;21:209–16.
doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0090
pubmed: 28994631
Grumbach K, Olayiwola JN. Patient empanelment: the importance of understanding who is at home in the medical home. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(2):170–2. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.150011 .
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.150011
pubmed: 25748755
Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18 .
Browne AJ, Tarlier DS. Examining the potential of nurse practitioners from a critical social justice perspective. Nurs Inq. 2008;15:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00411.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00411.x
pubmed: 18476851
Borycki EM, Sangster-Gormley E, Schreiber R, Thompson J, Griffith J, Feddema A, Kuo A. How are electronic medical records used by nurse practitioners? Stud Health Technol Inf. 2014;205:196–200.
Barbazza EAS, Byrnes M, Foebel AD, Khan T, Sidhom P, Klazinga NS, Kringos DS. The current and potential uses of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data for primary health care performance measurement in the Canadian context: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06851-0 .