Caesarean section and associated factors in Nigeria: assessing inequalities between rural and urban areas-insights from the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018.
Humans
Nigeria
/ epidemiology
Female
Rural Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Urban Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Adult
Cesarean Section
/ statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Young Adult
Health Surveys
Socioeconomic Factors
Adolescent
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Healthcare Disparities
/ statistics & numerical data
Educational Status
Caesarean section
Childbirth
Emergency obstetric care
Inequalities
Maternal-child health
Nigeria
Rural-urban differences
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
13
10
2023
accepted:
29
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When medically indicated, caesarean section (CS) can be a life-saving intervention for mothers and their newborns. This study assesses the prevalence of CS and its associated factors, focussing on inequalities between rural and urban areas in Nigeria. We disaggregated the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018 and performed analyses separately for Nigeria's overall, rural, and urban residences. We summarised data using frequency tabulations and identified factors associated with CS through multivariable logistic regression analysis. CS prevalence was 2.7% in Nigeria (overall), 5.2% in urban and 1.2% in rural areas. The North-West region had the lowest prevalence of 0.7%, 1.5% and 0.4% for the overall, urban and rural areas, respectively. Mothers with higher education demonstrated a greater CS prevalence of 14.0% overall, 15.3% in urban and 9.7% in rural residences. Frequent internet use increased CS prevalence nationally (14.3%) and in urban (15.1%) and rural (10.1%) residences. The southern regions showed higher CS prevalence, with the South-West leading overall (7.0%) and in rural areas (3.3%), and the South-South highest in urban areas (8.5%). Across all residences, rich wealth index, maternal age ≥ 35, lower birth order, and ≥ eight antenatal (ANC) contacts increased the odds of a CS. In rural Nigeria, husbands' education, spouses' joint healthcare decisions, birth size, and unplanned pregnancy increased CS odds. In urban Nigeria, multiple births, Christianity, frequent internet use, and ease of getting permission to visit healthcare facilities were associated with higher likelihood of CS. CS utilisation remains low in Nigeria and varies across rural-urban, regional, and socioeconomic divides. Targeted interventions are imperative for uneducated and socioeconomically disadvantaged mothers across all regions, as well as for mothers in urban areas who adhere to Islam, traditional, or 'other' religions. Comprehensive intervention measures should prioritise educational opportunities and resources, especially for rural areas, awareness campaigns on the benefits of medically indicated CS, and engagement with community and religious leaders to promote acceptance using culturally and religiously sensitive approaches. Other practical strategies include promoting optimal ANC contacts, expanding internet access and digital literacy, especially for rural women (e.g., through community Wi-Fi programs), improving healthcare infrastructure and accessibility in regions with low CS prevalence, particularly in the North-West, and implementing socioeconomic empowerment programs, especially for women in rural areas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143541
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06722-6
pii: 10.1186/s12884-024-06722-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
538Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Betrán AP, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526
pubmed: 26681211
Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2015;112:489.
pubmed: 26249251
pmcid: 4555060
Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. [Updated 2023 Jul 9]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/
Miller S, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388:2176–92.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6
pubmed: 27642019
Gibbons L, et al. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep. 2010;30:1–31.
World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf
Betran AP, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reproductive Health. 2015;12:1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6
Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Bishwajit G. Disparities in caesarean section prevalence and determinants across sub-saharan Africa countries. Global Health Res Policy. 2018;3:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0074-y .
doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0074-y
Adewuyi EO, Auta A, Khanal V, Tapshak SJ, Zhao Y. Cesarean delivery in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors―a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2019;9:e027273.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027273
pubmed: 31213450
pmcid: 6596937
Nigeria Population Commission. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2018. ICF: NPC; 2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR359/FR359.pdf
Boerma T, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392:1341–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31928-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31928-7
pubmed: 30322584
Boatin AA et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. bmj 360 (2018).
World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division: executive summary. (2023). Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/372247/9789240069251-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Banke-Thomas A, Avoka CK-o, Ogunyemi O. Prevalence, influencing factors, and outcomes of emergency caesarean section in public hospitals situated in the urban state of Lagos, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2023;23:640–51.
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i2.74
pubmed: 38223597
pmcid: 10782300
Osegi N, Makinde OI. Towards optimizing caesarean section: a five-year review of caesarean sections at a Southern Nigeria hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9:205–11.
doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20196021
Akadri AA, Imaralu JO, Salami OF, Nwankpa CC, Adepoju AA. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x
Onuminya DS. A review of caesarean delivery at the Kogi State specialist Hospital, Lokoja, Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;13:728–36.
doi: 10.4236/ojog.2023.134061
Chigbu C, Iloabachie G. The burden of caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;114:1261–5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01440.x
Sunday-Adeoye I, Kalu C. Pregnant Nigerian women’s view of cesarean section. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:276–9.
doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.86766
pubmed: 22037067
Akinola OI, et al. Caesarean section–an appraisal of some predictive factors in Lagos Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:217.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-217
pubmed: 24981086
pmcid: 4227104
Ajayi AI. Inequalities in access to birth by caesarean section in the context of user fee exemption for maternal health services in south-west and north central Nigeria. Int Health. 2021;13:598–605.
doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz118
pubmed: 32175562
Osayande I, et al. Prevalence, indications, and complications of caesarean section in health facilities across Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health. 2023;20:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01598-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01598-9
pubmed: 37268951
pmcid: 10237076
Ushie BA, Udoh EE, Ajayi A. I. examining inequalities in access to delivery by caesarean section in Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221778.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221778
pubmed: 31465505
pmcid: 6715280
Berglundh S, Benova L, Olisaekee G, Hanson C. Caesarean section rate in Nigeria between 2013 and 2018 by obstetric risk and socio-economic status. Tropical Med Int Health. 2021;26:775–88.
doi: 10.1111/tmi.13579
Ajayi KV, et al. A multi-level analysis of prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Nigeria. PLOS Global Public Health. 2023;3:e0000688.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000688
pubmed: 37363888
pmcid: 10292705
Adewuyi EO, et al. Antenatal care utilisation and receipt of its components in Nigeria: assessing disparities between rural and urban areas—a nationwide population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(7):e0307316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307316 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307316
pubmed: 39008484
pmcid: 11249263
Adewuyi EO, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Nigeria: a comparative study of rural and urban residences based on the 2013 Nigeria demographic and health survey. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197324 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197324
pubmed: 29782511
pmcid: 5962076
Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: policy implications. Health Care Women Int. 2017;38:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2016.1225743 .
doi: 10.1080/07399332.2016.1225743
pubmed: 27537979
Adewuyi EO, Zhao Y, Auta A, Lamichhane R. Prevalence and factors associated with non-utilization of healthcare facility for childbirth in rural and urban Nigeria: analysis of a national population-based survey. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45:675–82.
doi: 10.1177/1403494817705562
pubmed: 28653565
World Health Organization. National health inequality monitoring: a step-by-step manual. World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/255652
Ahinkorah BO, et al. Rural–urban disparities in caesarean deliveries in sub-saharan Africa: a multivariate non-linear decomposition modelling of demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:709. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04992-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04992-6
pubmed: 36115842
pmcid: 9482294
Adewuyi EO, Zhao Y, Khanal V, Auta A, Bulndi LB. Rural-urban differences on the rates and factors associated with early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria: further analysis of the Nigeria demographic and health survey, 2013. Int Breastfeed J. 2017;12:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0141-x .
doi: 10.1186/s13006-017-0141-x
pubmed: 29299048
pmcid: 5747139
Adewuyi EO, Zhao Y, Lamichhane R. Risk factors for infant mortality in rural and urban Nigeria: evidence from the national household survey. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45:543–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817696599 .
doi: 10.1177/1403494817696599
pubmed: 28355963
Adewuyi EO, Zhao Y. Determinants of neonatal mortality in rural and urban Nigeria: evidence from a population-based national survey. Pediatr Int. 2017;59:190–200.
doi: 10.1111/ped.13086
pubmed: 27378178
Cao J, et al. Trends in maternal age and the relationship between advanced age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based register study in Wuhan, China, 2010–2017. Public Health. 2022;206:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.015
pubmed: 35306195
Adewuyi EO, et al. Home childbirth among young mothers aged 15–24 years in Nigeria: a national population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2019;9:e025494.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025494
pubmed: 31537553
pmcid: 6756611
World Health Organization. World Health statistics 2016 [OP]: Monitoring Health for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/206498
National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville. Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International.; 2009. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/sr173/sr173.pdf
Kibe PM, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Rwanda: a trend analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2000 to 2019–20. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04679-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04679-y
pubmed: 35578320
pmcid: 9112592
Okyere J, Duah HO, Seidu A-A, Ahinkorah BO, Budu E. Inequalities in prevalence of birth by caesarean section in Ghana from 1998–2014. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04378-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04378-8
pubmed: 35065625
pmcid: 8783997
Jimoh Amzat KA, Muchabveyo B. Social Determinants of Health in Africa. Oxf Handb Sociol Afr, 229 (2023).
WHO, UNFPA & UNICEF. AMDD. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva; 2009.
Ijadunola KT et al. Unavailability of essential obstetric care services in a local government area of south-west Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr, 94–100 (2007).
Abegunde D, et al. Availability, utilization, and quality of emergency obstetric care services in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128:251–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.09.029
Okoli U, et al. Prenatal care and basic emergency obstetric care services provided at primary healthcare facilities in rural Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;117:61–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.11.014
Banke-Thomas A, Abejirinde I-OO, Ogunyemi O. Gwacham-Anisiobi, U. Innovative dashboard for optimising emergency obstetric care geographical accessibility in Nigeria: qualitative study with technocrats. Health Policy Technol. 2023;12:100756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100756 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100756
Okonkwo J, Ibeh C. The contribution of privately owned hospitals in the provision of essential obstetric care in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2006;9:159–63.
pubmed: 17319350
Yaya S, Zegeye B, Idriss-Wheeler D, Shibre G. Inequalities in caesarean section in Burundi: evidence from the Burundi demographic and health surveys (2010–2016). BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05516-8
Geleto A, Chojenta C, Musa A, Loxton D. Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review of literature. Syst Reviews. 2018;7:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0842-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0842-2
Res G. 32/L. 20, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet., UN Doc. (A/HRC/32/L. 20, 2016).
Reglitz M. The human right to Free Internet Access. J Appl Philos. 2020;37:314–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12395 .
doi: 10.1111/japp.12395
Sieck CJ, et al. Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:52.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
pubmed: 33731887
pmcid: 7969595
Gibbons C. in Panel Discussion, Digital Skills and Connectivity as Social Determinants of Health. Sheon, A Conference Report: Digital Skills: A Hidden Super Social Determinant of Health: Interdisciplinary Association for Population Health Science
Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int. 2021;2:100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117 .
doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
pubmed: 34806053
pmcid: 8590973