Experimental glaucoma microstent implantation in two animal models and human donor eyes-an

3Rs principle Alloplastic implant Rostock glaucoma microstent (RGM) micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS)

Journal

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 23 06 2023
accepted: 20 11 2023
medline: 15 8 2024
pubmed: 15 8 2024
entrez: 15 8 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has become an important treatment approach for primary open angle glaucoma. Restoration of aqueous humour drainage by means of alloplastic implants represents a promising treatment option and is itself subject of methodological development. An adequate positioning in the targeted tissue regions is essential is important for the performance of our in-house developed Rostock glaucoma microstent (RGM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of two animal models and human donor eyes regarding RGM placement. Eyes were obtained from rabbits, pigs, and human body donations. After orbital exenterations, RGMs were placed in the anterior chamber draining in the subconjunctival space. X-ray contrast was increased by incubation in aqueous iodine solution for subsequent detailed micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based visualization and analysis. In contrast to the human and porcine eyes, the stent extended far to the posterior pole with a more pronounced curvature along the globe in the rabbit eyes due to their smaller size. However, dysfunctional deformations were not depicted. Adequate positioning of the stent's inflow area in the anterior chamber and the outflow area in the Tenon space was achieved in both the animal models and the human eye. Micro-CT has proven to be a valuable tool for postoperative

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has become an important treatment approach for primary open angle glaucoma. Restoration of aqueous humour drainage by means of alloplastic implants represents a promising treatment option and is itself subject of methodological development. An adequate positioning in the targeted tissue regions is essential is important for the performance of our in-house developed Rostock glaucoma microstent (RGM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of two animal models and human donor eyes regarding RGM placement.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Eyes were obtained from rabbits, pigs, and human body donations. After orbital exenterations, RGMs were placed in the anterior chamber draining in the subconjunctival space. X-ray contrast was increased by incubation in aqueous iodine solution for subsequent detailed micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based visualization and analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
In contrast to the human and porcine eyes, the stent extended far to the posterior pole with a more pronounced curvature along the globe in the rabbit eyes due to their smaller size. However, dysfunctional deformations were not depicted. Adequate positioning of the stent's inflow area in the anterior chamber and the outflow area in the Tenon space was achieved in both the animal models and the human eye.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Micro-CT has proven to be a valuable tool for postoperative

Identifiants

pubmed: 39144040
doi: 10.21037/qims-23-905
pii: qims-14-08-5321
pmc: PMC11320535
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

5321-5332

Informations de copyright

2024 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://qims.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/qims-23-905/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Jens Runge (J)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Sabine Kischkel (S)

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Jonas Keiler (J)

Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Niels Grabow (N)

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Klaus-Peter Schmitz (KP)

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e.V., Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.

Stefan Siewert (S)

Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e.V., Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.

Andreas Wree (A)

Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Rudolf F Guthoff (RF)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

Thomas Stahnke (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Institute for Implant Technology and Biomaterials e.V., Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany.
Department of Life, Light & Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Classifications MeSH