Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.
Extended reality, augmented reality
Medical remote assistance
Mixed reality
Operating rooms
Surgery
Journal
Journal of medical systems
ISSN: 1573-689X
Titre abrégé: J Med Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Aug 2024
15 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
02
2024
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
15
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mixed Reality is a technology that has gained attention due to its unique capabilities for accessing and visualizing information. When integrated with voice control mechanisms, gestures and even iris movement, it becomes a valuable tool for medicine. These features are particularly appealing for the operating room and surgical learning, where access to information and freedom of hand operation are fundamental. This study examines the most significant research on mixed reality in the operating room over the past five years, to identify the trends, use cases, its applications and limitations. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to answer the research questions established using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework. Although implementation of Mixed Reality applications in the operations room presents some challenges, when used appropriately, it can yield remarkable results. It can make learning easier, flatten the learning curve for several procedures, and facilitate various aspects of the surgical processes. The articles' conclusions highlight the potential benefits of these innovations in surgical practice while acknowledging the challenges that must be addressed. Technical complexity, equipment costs, and steep learning curves present significant obstacles to the widespread adoption of Mixed Reality and computer-assisted evaluation. The need for more flexible approaches and comprehensive studies is underscored by the specificity of procedures and limited samples sizes. The integration of imaging modalities and innovative functionalities holds promise for clinical applications. However, it is important to consider issues related to usability, bias, and statistical analyses. Mixed Reality offers significant benefits, but there are still open challenges such as ergonomic issues, limited field of view, and battery autonomy that must be addressed to ensure widespread acceptance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39145896
doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02095-7
pii: 10.1007/s10916-024-02095-7
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
76Subventions
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : UIDB/05210/2020
Organisme : Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
ID : UIDB/05210/2020
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
J. R. Kirkup, ‘The history and evolution of surgical instruments’, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, vol. 63, no. 4, 1981, [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493802/
K. E. Roberts, R. L. Bell, and A. J. Duffy, ‘Evolution of surgical skills training’, World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 3219-3224, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3219 .
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i20.3219
pubmed: 16718842
pmcid: 4087965
L. Coelho, Q. Ricardo, and S. Reis, ‘Emerging Advancements for Virtual and Augmented Reality in Healthcare’, IGI Global, 2021.
D. Kamińska, G. Zwolińsksi, A. Laska-Leśniewicz, and L. P. Coelho, ‘Virtual Reality in Healthcare: A Survey’, in Emerging Advancements for Virtual and Augmented Reality in Healthcare, IGI Global, 2022, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8371-5.ch001 .
B. L. Wong and S. A. Clark, ‘Assessing the effectiveness of animation and virtual reality in teaching operative dentistry’, Journal of Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 1, 2000.
Y. Baashar, G. Alkawsi, W. N. Wan Ahmad, M. A. Alomari, H. Alhussian, and S. K. Tiong, ‘Towards Wearable Augmented Reality in Healthcare: A Comparative Survey and Analysis of Head-Mounted Displays’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 5, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053940 .
N. J. Wei, B. Dougherty, A. Myers, and S. M. Badawy, ‘Using Google Glass in Surgical Settings: Systematic Review.’, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, vol. 6, no. 3, p. e54, Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9409 .
A. Saylany, M. Spadola, R. Blue, N. Sharma, A. K. Ozturk, and J. W. Yoon, ‘The Use of a Novel Heads-Up Display (HUD) to View Intra-Operative X-Rays During a One-Level Cervical Arthroplasty’, World Neurosurgery, vol. 138, pp. 369-373, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.073 .
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.073
pubmed: 32201294
P. Milgram and F. Kishino, ‘A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays’, IEICE Trans. Information Systems, vol. D, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329, Dec. 1994.
W. Qian, ‘What is mixed reality? - Mixed Reality’, Accessed: Oct, vol. 25, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/discover/mixed-reality
O. Hugues, P. Fuchs, and O. Nannipieri, ‘New Augmented Reality Taxonomy: Technologies and Features of Augmented Environment’, in Handbook of Augmented Reality, B. Furht, Ed., New York, NY: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_2 .
S. Rokhsaritalemi, A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, and S.-M. Choi, ‘A Review on Mixed Reality: Current Trends, Challenges and Prospects’, Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020636 .
P. Milgram, H. Takemura, A. Utsumi, and F. Kishino, ‘Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum’, in Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, SPIE, 1995, pp. 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321 .
R. P. Kumar et al., ‘Use of mixed reality for surgery planning: Assessment and development workflow’, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 112, p. 100077, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100077 .
doi: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2020.100077
J. A. Sánchez-Margallo, C. P. Miguel, R. A. F. Anzules, and F. M. Sánchez-Margallo, ‘Application of Mixed Reality in Medical Training and Surgical Planning Focused on Minimally Invasive Surgery’, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, vol. 2, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/ https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.692641
M. T. Vervoorn, M. Wulfse, T. P. C. Doormaal, J. P. Ruurda, N. P. Kaaij, and L. M. Heer, ‘Mixed Reality in Modern Surgical and Interventional Practice: Narrative Review of the Literature’, JMIR Serious Games, vol. 11, p. 41297, 2023, https://doi.org/10.2196/41297 .
doi: 10.2196/41297
P. Guha, J. Lawson, I. Minty, J. Kinross, and G. Martin, ‘Can mixed reality technologies teach surgical skills better than traditional methods? A prospective randomised feasibility study’, BMC Medical Education, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 144, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04122-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04122-6
pubmed: 36869306
E. Bollen, L. Awad, B. Langridge, and P. E. M. Butler, ‘The intraoperative use of augmented and mixed reality technology to improve surgical outcomes: A systematic review’, Int J Med Robot, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 2450, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2450 .
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2450
M. J. Page, ‘The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews’, BMJ, vol. 372, p. 71, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and T. P. Group, ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement’, PLOS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, p. 1000097, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
‘IHE Quality Appraisal Checklist for Case Series Studies’, Accessed: Nov, vol. 02, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.ihe.ca/publications/ihe-quality-appraisal-checklist-for-case-series-studies
G. A. Wells, ‘The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses’, Accessed: Nov, vol. 02, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
M. Simone et al., ‘Remote mentoring in laparotomic and laparoscopic cancer surgery during Covid-19 pandemic: an experimental setup based on mixed reality’, Medical Education Online, vol. 26, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1996923 .
P. Stefan, ‘Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery: application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation’, BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 000135, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000135
J. Cen, ‘Three-Dimensional Printing, Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality for Pulmonary Atresia: Early Surgical Outcomes Evaluation’, Heart, Lung and Circulation, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 296-302, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.017
pubmed: 32863113
Y. Saito, ‘Intraoperative support with three-dimensional holographic cholangiography in hepatobiliary surgery’, Langenbecks Arch Surg, vol. 407, no. 3, pp. 1285-1289, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02336-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02336-0
pubmed: 34557939
J. Cartucho and D. Shapira, ‘Multimodal mixed reality visualisation for intraoperative surgical guidance | International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery’, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 15, pp. 819-826, 2020.
doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02165-4
pubmed: 32333360
pmcid: 7261260
R. Galati, M. Simone, G. Barile, R. Luca, C. Cartanese, and G. Grassi, ‘Experimental Setup Employed in the Operating Room Based on Virtual and Mixed Reality: Analysis of Pros and Cons in Open Abdomen Surgery’, Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2020, p. 8851964, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8851964 .
doi: 10.1155/2020/8851964
pubmed: 32832048
pmcid: 7428968
S. Reis, P. Guimarães, F. Coelho, E. Nogueira, and L. Coelho, ‘A framework for simulation systems and technologies for medical training’, in 2018 Global Medical Engineering Physics Exchanges/Pan American Health Care Exchanges (GMEPE/PAHCE, 2018, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GMEPE-PAHCE.2018.8400757 .
R. Veloso, R. Magalhães, A. Marques, P. V. Gomes, and J. Pereira, ‘Mixed Reality in an Operating Room Using Hololens 2—The Use of the Remote Assistance from Manufacturers Technicians during the Surgeries’, Engineering Proceedings, vol. 7, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2021007054 .
E. Zhu, A. Hadadgar, I. Masiello, and N. Zary, ‘Augmented reality in healthcare education: an integrative review’, PeerJ, vol. 2, p. 469, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.469 .
doi: 10.7717/peerj.469