Undetectable PSA predicts outcome after salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Biochemical recurrence Salvage radiotherapy Undetectable PSA

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 04 2024
revised: 03 08 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 16 8 2024
pubmed: 16 8 2024
entrez: 15 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a curative treatment option in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.1 ng/mL following SRT predicts biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS). The aim of this large retrospective study was to evaluate whether this effect persists in an extended follow-up of >5 years. A total of 678 patients treated with SRT for biochemical recurrence after RP were included. Exclusion criteria were lymph node or distant metastases, pre-SRT PSA > 3 ng/mL, and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between RP and SRT. All patients received a median dose of 70.2 (range 59.4-72.0) Gy to the prostatic fossa. The log-rank test (Kaplan-Meier) and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the impact of disease- and treatment-related parameters on BPFS, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Median follow-up after SRT was 5.6 (range 0.1-14.5) years. The 5-year BPFS was 77.8% in patients with a PSA nadir < 0.1 ng/mL (undetectable) and 16.3 % in the remaining cohort (p < 0.001). Five-year MFS was 95.3 % with undetectable PSA versus 84.0 % with detectable PSA (p < 0.001), and 5-year OS values were 97.5 % and 92.7 % with undetectable versus detectable PSA, respectively (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, undetectable PSA was the strongest predictor of BPFS (HR = 0.122; 95 %CI: 0.080-0.187; p < 0.001) and MFS (HR = 0.262; 95 %CI: 0.136-0.594; p < 0.001), but was not significant for OS (HR = 0.615; 95 %CI: 0.298-1.269; p = 0.189). PSA < 0.1 ng/mL following SRT without ADT is a significant predictor of BPFS and MFS. The results suggest that it might be feasible to withhold ADT in selected patients if they have undetectable PSA after SRT. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a curative treatment option in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.1 ng/mL following SRT predicts biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS). The aim of this large retrospective study was to evaluate whether this effect persists in an extended follow-up of >5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A total of 678 patients treated with SRT for biochemical recurrence after RP were included. Exclusion criteria were lymph node or distant metastases, pre-SRT PSA > 3 ng/mL, and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between RP and SRT. All patients received a median dose of 70.2 (range 59.4-72.0) Gy to the prostatic fossa. The log-rank test (Kaplan-Meier) and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the impact of disease- and treatment-related parameters on BPFS, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS RESULTS
Median follow-up after SRT was 5.6 (range 0.1-14.5) years. The 5-year BPFS was 77.8% in patients with a PSA nadir < 0.1 ng/mL (undetectable) and 16.3 % in the remaining cohort (p < 0.001). Five-year MFS was 95.3 % with undetectable PSA versus 84.0 % with detectable PSA (p < 0.001), and 5-year OS values were 97.5 % and 92.7 % with undetectable versus detectable PSA, respectively (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, undetectable PSA was the strongest predictor of BPFS (HR = 0.122; 95 %CI: 0.080-0.187; p < 0.001) and MFS (HR = 0.262; 95 %CI: 0.136-0.594; p < 0.001), but was not significant for OS (HR = 0.615; 95 %CI: 0.298-1.269; p = 0.189).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
PSA < 0.1 ng/mL following SRT without ADT is a significant predictor of BPFS and MFS. The results suggest that it might be feasible to withhold ADT in selected patients if they have undetectable PSA after SRT. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39147035
pii: S0167-8140(24)00746-1
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110476
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110476

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Sophia Scharl (S)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: Sophia.scharl@uniklinik-ulm.de.

Luca Gartner (L)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Dirk Heinz Gerhard Böhmer (DHG)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Alessandra Siegmann (A)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Reinhard Thamm (R)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Manuel Krafcsik (M)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Benjamin Mayer (B)

Institute für Epidemiologie und Medizinische Biometrie, Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Daniel Zips (D)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Christian Ruf (C)

Klinik für Urologie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Thomas Wiegel (T)

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Classifications MeSH