Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment to prevent anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive colorectal surgery (AVOID): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.


Journal

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 2468-1253
Titre abrégé: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101690683

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 09 04 2024
revised: 10 06 2024
accepted: 14 06 2024
medline: 17 8 2024
pubmed: 17 8 2024
entrez: 16 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Anastomotic leakage is a severe postoperative complication in colorectal surgery and compromised bowel perfusion is considered a major contributing factor. Conventional methods to assess bowel perfusion have a low predictive value for anastomotic leakage. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy of real-time assessment with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in the prevention of anastomotic leakage. This multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We included adults (aged >18 years) who were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery (with planned primary anastomosis) for benign and malignant diseases. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fluorescence-guided bowel anastomosis (FGBA) or conventional bowel anastomosis (CBA) by variable block randomisation (block sizes 4, 6, and 8) and stratified by site. The operating surgeon and investigators analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. Patients were unmasked after the surgical procedure or after study end. In the FGBA group, surgeons marked anastomosis levels per conventional perfusion assessment and then administered 5 mg of ICG by 2 mL intravenous bolus. They assessed bowel perfusion using NIR fluorescence imaging and adjusted (or kept) transection lines accordingly. Only conventional methods for bowel perfusion assessment were used in the CBA group. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage (ie, requiring active therapeutic intervention but manageable without reoperation [grade B] or requiring reoperation [grade C], per the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer) between the FGBA group and the CBA group within 90 days post-surgery. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ToetsingOnline.nl (NL7502) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04712032) and is complete. Between July 2, 2020, and Feb 21, 2023, 982 patients were enrolled, of whom 490 were assigned to FGBA and 492 were assigned to CBA. After excluding 51 patients, the intention-to-treat population comprised 931 (463 assigned FGBA and 468 assigned CBA). Patients had a median age of 68·0 years (IQR 59·0-75·0) and 485 (52%) were male and 446 (48%) were female. Ethnicity data were not available. The overall 90-day rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage was not significantly different between the FGBA group (32 [7%] of 463 patients) and the CBA group (42 [9%] of 468 patients; relative risk 0·77 [95% CI 0·50-1·20]; p=0·24). No adverse events related to ICG use were observed. 313 serious adverse events in 229 (25%) patients were at 90-day follow-up (159 serious adverse events in 113 [24%] patients in the FGBA group and 154 serious adverse events in 116 [25%] patients in the CBA group). 18 (2%) people died by 90 days (ten in the FGBA group and eight in the CBA group). ICG NIR fluorescence imaging did not reduce 90-day anastomotic leakage rates in this trial across all types of colorectal surgeries. Further research should be done in subgroups, such as rectosigmoid resections, for which evidence suggests ICG NIR might be beneficial. Olympus Medical, Diagnostic Green, and Intuitive Foundation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Anastomotic leakage is a severe postoperative complication in colorectal surgery and compromised bowel perfusion is considered a major contributing factor. Conventional methods to assess bowel perfusion have a low predictive value for anastomotic leakage. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy of real-time assessment with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in the prevention of anastomotic leakage.
METHODS METHODS
This multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We included adults (aged >18 years) who were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery (with planned primary anastomosis) for benign and malignant diseases. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fluorescence-guided bowel anastomosis (FGBA) or conventional bowel anastomosis (CBA) by variable block randomisation (block sizes 4, 6, and 8) and stratified by site. The operating surgeon and investigators analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. Patients were unmasked after the surgical procedure or after study end. In the FGBA group, surgeons marked anastomosis levels per conventional perfusion assessment and then administered 5 mg of ICG by 2 mL intravenous bolus. They assessed bowel perfusion using NIR fluorescence imaging and adjusted (or kept) transection lines accordingly. Only conventional methods for bowel perfusion assessment were used in the CBA group. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage (ie, requiring active therapeutic intervention but manageable without reoperation [grade B] or requiring reoperation [grade C], per the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer) between the FGBA group and the CBA group within 90 days post-surgery. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ToetsingOnline.nl (NL7502) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04712032) and is complete.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Between July 2, 2020, and Feb 21, 2023, 982 patients were enrolled, of whom 490 were assigned to FGBA and 492 were assigned to CBA. After excluding 51 patients, the intention-to-treat population comprised 931 (463 assigned FGBA and 468 assigned CBA). Patients had a median age of 68·0 years (IQR 59·0-75·0) and 485 (52%) were male and 446 (48%) were female. Ethnicity data were not available. The overall 90-day rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage was not significantly different between the FGBA group (32 [7%] of 463 patients) and the CBA group (42 [9%] of 468 patients; relative risk 0·77 [95% CI 0·50-1·20]; p=0·24). No adverse events related to ICG use were observed. 313 serious adverse events in 229 (25%) patients were at 90-day follow-up (159 serious adverse events in 113 [24%] patients in the FGBA group and 154 serious adverse events in 116 [25%] patients in the CBA group). 18 (2%) people died by 90 days (ten in the FGBA group and eight in the CBA group).
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
ICG NIR fluorescence imaging did not reduce 90-day anastomotic leakage rates in this trial across all types of colorectal surgeries. Further research should be done in subgroups, such as rectosigmoid resections, for which evidence suggests ICG NIR might be beneficial.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
Olympus Medical, Diagnostic Green, and Intuitive Foundation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39151436
pii: S2468-1253(24)00198-5
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00198-5
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04712032']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Robin A Faber (RA)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Ruben P J Meijer (RPJ)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Daphne H M Droogh (DHM)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Jasmijn J Jongbloed (JJ)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Okker D Bijlstra (OD)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Fran Boersma (F)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Jeffrey P B M Braak (JPBM)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg (E)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Hein Putter (H)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Fabian A Holman (FA)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

J Sven D Mieog (JSD)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Peter A Neijenhuis (PA)

Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.

Esther van Staveren (E)

Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.

Johanne G Bloemen (JG)

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Jacobus W A Burger (JWA)

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Tjeerd S Aukema (TS)

Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands.

Mark A M Brouwers (MAM)

Department of Surgery, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands.

Andreas W K S Marinelli (AWKS)

Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

Marinke Westerterp (M)

Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

Pascal G Doornebosch (PG)

Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.

Annelies van der Weijde (A)

Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.

Koop Bosscha (K)

Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.

Henricus J M Handgraaf (HJM)

Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.

Esther C J Consten (ECJ)

Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Daan J Sikkenk (DJ)

Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands.

Jacobus Burggraaf (J)

Centre of Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands.

Stijn Keereweer (S)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Joost R van der Vorst (JR)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Merlijn Hutteman (M)

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Koen C M J Peeters (KCMJ)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Alexander L Vahrmeijer (AL)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Denise E Hilling (DE)

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: d.e.hilling@lumc.nl.

Classifications MeSH