Dupilumab response onset, maintenance, and durability in patients with severe CRSwNP.

Biologic therapy SINUS-52 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps dupilumab responder analysis

Journal

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
ISSN: 1097-6825
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1275002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 17 08 2023
revised: 03 07 2024
accepted: 29 07 2024
medline: 17 8 2024
pubmed: 17 8 2024
entrez: 16 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Responder analyses of SINUS phase 3 study data have shown clinically meaningful improvements across multiple chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) outcomes with dupilumab. To gain a better understanding of dupilumab response dynamics over 52 weeks. Post hoc analysis using data from the SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) intention-to-treat population, of patients with severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo. Response, defined as an improvement from baseline of ≥ 1 point for Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC), and loss of smell (LoS), and ≥ 8.9 points for 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed for rapidity, maintenance, and durability. 303 patients (dupilumab, n = 150; placebo, n = 153) were included. For each outcome measure, a greater proportion of patients achieved first response by Week 16 (rapidity) with dupilumab vs placebo: NPS, 75.3% vs 39.2%; NC, 60.0% vs 24.2%; LoS, 60.7% vs 15.7%; and SNOT-22, 83.3% vs 66.0%. Among dupilumab patients with a response by Week 16, more than 80% maintained response at Week 52 (maintenance). Over 52 weeks, greater proportions of dupilumab patients were responders at ≥ 80% of time points: NPS, 46.7% vs 2.6%; NC, 46.7% vs 9.2%; LoS, 47.3% vs 3.9%; and SNOT-22, 62.0% vs 21.6% (durability). Most CRSwNP patients achieve clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab by Week 16, and most of these patients had maintenance and durability of response with continued treatment over time.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Responder analyses of SINUS phase 3 study data have shown clinically meaningful improvements across multiple chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) outcomes with dupilumab.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To gain a better understanding of dupilumab response dynamics over 52 weeks.
METHODS METHODS
Post hoc analysis using data from the SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) intention-to-treat population, of patients with severe CRSwNP who received dupilumab 300 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) or placebo. Response, defined as an improvement from baseline of ≥ 1 point for Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC), and loss of smell (LoS), and ≥ 8.9 points for 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed for rapidity, maintenance, and durability.
RESULTS RESULTS
303 patients (dupilumab, n = 150; placebo, n = 153) were included. For each outcome measure, a greater proportion of patients achieved first response by Week 16 (rapidity) with dupilumab vs placebo: NPS, 75.3% vs 39.2%; NC, 60.0% vs 24.2%; LoS, 60.7% vs 15.7%; and SNOT-22, 83.3% vs 66.0%. Among dupilumab patients with a response by Week 16, more than 80% maintained response at Week 52 (maintenance). Over 52 weeks, greater proportions of dupilumab patients were responders at ≥ 80% of time points: NPS, 46.7% vs 2.6%; NC, 46.7% vs 9.2%; LoS, 47.3% vs 3.9%; and SNOT-22, 62.0% vs 21.6% (durability).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Most CRSwNP patients achieve clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab by Week 16, and most of these patients had maintenance and durability of response with continued treatment over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39151476
pii: S0091-6749(24)00820-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Claus Bachert (C)

University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany; First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: claus.bachert@ukmuenster.de.

Asif H Khan (AH)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Wytske J Fokkens (WJ)

Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Claire Hopkins (C)

King's College London, London, UK.

Philippe Gevaert (P)

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Joseph K Han (JK)

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Peter W Hellings (PW)

University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Stella E Lee (SE)

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Jérôme Msihid (J)

Sanofi, Gentilly, France.

Scott Nash (S)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Harry Sacks (H)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Juby A Jacob-Nara (JA)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Yamo Deniz (Y)

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.

Paul J Rowe (PJ)

Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Classifications MeSH