The Fragility Index is Typically Misinterpreted and of Low Value: Clinical Trials are Designed to be Fragile.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Aug 2024
15 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
04
08
2024
accepted:
04
08
2024
medline:
17
8
2024
pubmed:
17
8
2024
entrez:
16
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Fragility Index (FI) is defined as the number of patients whose outcome would need to change to reverse a statistically significant finding to a nonsignificant finding. The FI is nothing more than a repackaging of statistical significance based on the P value, perpetuating the (1) ignoring of results that are "not" statistically significant, (2) treating results that are statistically significant as certain, and (3) distracting from evaluation of clinical significance. A well-designed trial includes a sample size calculation to determine the minimum number of patients required to observe a difference between study groups (if a difference exists). By including this minimum number, clinical trials are designed to be fragile, yet subsequently criticized as such, leading readers to the incorrect conclusion that the studies are flawed. It's time to move past systematic reviews focused on the FI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39151709
pii: S0749-8063(24)00560-7
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.