Student mental health outcomes of a clustered SMART for developing an adaptive implementation strategy to support school-based CBT delivery.

Implementation strategies SMART Student mental health

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 12 03 2024
revised: 07 08 2024
accepted: 11 08 2024
medline: 17 8 2024
pubmed: 17 8 2024
entrez: 16 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Most youth experiencing anxiety/depression lack access to evidence-based mental health practices (EBPs). School-delivered care improves access, and various support can help school professionals (SPs; school social workers, counselors) deliver EBPs, like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Understanding implementation strategies' impact on downstream mental health outcomes is crucial to scaling up EBPs to address the treatment gap, but it has rarely been assessed. This paper compares implementation strategies' impact on change in student outcomes, collected as exploratory outcomes from a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. A clustered, sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial design was used, which embedded four implementation supports that differentially sequence three implementation strategies, Replicating Effective Programs (REP), Coaching, and Facilitation. Prior to the first randomization, N = 169 SPs from 94 Michigan high schools each identified up to 10 students whom they believed could benefit from CBT and facilitated student survey completion. Changes in students' depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, modified for teens) and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) over 10 months were compared across the four sequences of implementation support using a generalization of a marginal, weighted least squares approach developed for a clustered SMARTs. Small, non-clinically significant reductions in symptoms over the study period were found. Pairwise comparisons found no significant differences in symptom change across the four implementation strategies. The difference in the estimated mean PHQ-9 T/GAD-7 scores between the least and the most intensive strategies (REP vs. REP+Coaching+Facilitation) was 1.04 (95%CI = -0.95, 3.04) for depression and 0.82 (95%CI = -0.89, 2.52) for anxiety. No difference in symptom change was found across the four implementation strategies. Multiple forms of implementation support may be useful for improving student mental health outcomes. NCT03541317-Registered on 29 May 2018 on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39151756
pii: S0165-0327(24)01265-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.048
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03541317']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript warrant that we have no actual or perceived conflicts of interest—financial or non-financial—in the procedures described in the enclosed manuscript. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or other public entity. TRAILS is in the process of applying for non-profit corporation status (501c.3).

Auteurs

Shawna N Smith (SN)

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA. Electronic address: shawnana@umich.edu.

Daniel Almirall (D)

Survey Research Center, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, USA; Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, USA.

Seo Youn Choi (SY)

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA.

Carolyn Andrews (C)

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA.

Elizabeth Koschmann (E)

Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.

Amy Rusch (A)

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA.

Emily Bilek (E)

Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.

Annalise Lane (A)

Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA.

James L Abelson (JL)

Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.

Daniel Eisenberg (D)

Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA, USA.

Joseph A Himle (JA)

Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA; School of Social Work, University of Michigan, USA.

Celeste Liebrecht (C)

Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.

Amy M Kilbourne (AM)

Department of Learning Health Sciences, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA; Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), US Department of Veterans Affairs, USA.

Classifications MeSH