Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Multicenter Observational Study.

comparative study distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm endovascular treatment neck clipping

Journal

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association
ISSN: 1532-8511
Titre abrégé: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9111633

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 29 04 2024
revised: 10 08 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 17 8 2024
pubmed: 17 8 2024
entrez: 16 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Distal anterior cerebral artery (DACA) aneurysms account for 1%-9% of all intracranial aneurysms. Microsurgical treatment is generally preferred for DACA aneurysms; however, it presents challenges owing to the anatomical complexities. Advances in neuro-interventional techniques have yielded promising results. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of DACA aneurysms treated with microsurgery and endovascular treatment (EVT) to elucidate the efficacy of EVT. A multicenter observational registry comprising 16 stroke centers was utilized for this study. Data was retrospectively and prospectively analyzed from 166 patients with DACA aneurysms in our database, which included 4,552 consecutive patients with ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent microsurgical or endovascular treatment between January 2013 and December 2021. Surgical clipping was performed in 115 patients, and 51 underwent coil embolization. The median follow-up duration was 15.3 months. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the two treatment modalities. There were no differences in complication-related morbidity between the microsurgical treatment and EVT groups in either unruptured (10.5% vs. 9.1%, p=1.00) or ruptured aneurysms (5.2% vs. 6.9%, p=0.66). Coil embolization resulted in higher recurrence and retreatment rates than surgical clipping did, especially for ruptured aneurysms (2.6% vs. 27.6%, p<0.01). Endovascular treatment is an alternative to microsurgery for DACA aneurysms especially in unruptured cases or the patients who have difficulty undergoing craniotomy due to their general condition, albeit with considerations for higher recurrence and retreatment rates, particularly in ruptured cases. Close follow-up is crucial for the effective management of these challenges. Further studies are needed to refine the treatment strategies for DACA aneurysms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39151814
pii: S1052-3057(24)00385-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107941
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107941

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mariko Ishikawa (M)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Ome Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Satoru Takahashi (S)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Sakyo Hirai (S)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Yohei Sato (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Musashino Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Keigo Shigeta (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Masataka Yoshimura (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.

Toshihiro Yamamura (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Soka Municipal Hospital, Saitama, Japan.

Naoki Taira (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Shuuwa General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.

Tadahiro Ishiwada (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Shioda Memorial Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Jun Karakama (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Ome Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Kana Sawada (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.

Yoshiki Obata (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo-Kita Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Kenji Yamada (K)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Yoshikazu Yoshino (Y)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Yosuke Ishii (Y)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hikaru Wakabayashi (H)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Kyohei Fujita (K)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Shoko Fujii (S)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirotaka Sagawa (H)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Shigeru Nemoto (S)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Taketoshi Maehara (T)

Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazutaka Sumita (K)

Department of Endovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: sumita.nsrg@tmd.ac.jp.

Classifications MeSH