A multi-center evaluation of a novel IVF cryostorage device in an active clinical setting.
Automation
Cryostorage
Digital chain of custody
Embryo
IVF
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2024
16 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
29
03
2024
accepted:
09
08
2024
medline:
17
8
2024
pubmed:
17
8
2024
entrez:
16
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to evaluate the function, and usability of a novel automated software-guided cryostorage system in an active IVF laboratory setting. The investigational device (ID) was installed at 3 IVF laboratories (sites: α, β, and γ). A total of 15 embryologists were trained to use the ID. Mock patient specimens containing mirrored live patient data were handled using the ID. Temperature readings were recorded every minute. Successful identification, storage, and retrieval of mock patient specimens by the ID were evaluated. To assess an LN
Identifiants
pubmed: 39152173
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69877-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69877-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18965Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Alikani, M. Cryostorage of human gametes and embryos: A reckoning. Reprod. Biomed. Online 37(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.004 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.004
pubmed: 29778555
Alikani, M. & Parmegiani, L. Human reproductive cell cryopreservation, storage, handling, and transport: Risks and risk management. Semin. Reprod. Med. 36, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676849 (2018).
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676849
pubmed: 30947342
Alikani, M., Go, K. J., McCaffrey, C. & McCulloh, D. H. Comprehensive evaluation of contemporary assisted reproduction technology laboratory operations to determine staffing levels that promote patient safety and quality care. Fertil. Steril. 102, 1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1246 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1246
pubmed: 25226853
Campbell, A. et al. In vitro fertilization and andrology laboratory in 2030: Expert visions. Fertil. Steril. 116, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.088 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.088
pubmed: 34148588
Canosa, S. et al. Cryostorage management of reproductive cells and tissues in ART: Status, needs, opportunities and potential new challenges. Reprod. Biomed. Online 47, 103252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.06.007 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.06.007
pubmed: 37451970
Go, K. J. A subspecialty of the assisted reproductive technologies: cryogenic inventory maintenance. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 36(1), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1378-z (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1378-z
pubmed: 30554394
Niederberger, C. et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil. Steril. 110, 185-324.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005
pubmed: 30053940
Rienzi, L. & Fauser, B. Future challenges for clinical embryologists. Reprod. Biomed. Online 43, 973–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.001 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.001
pubmed: 34753678
Rinehart, L. A. Storage, transport, and disposition of gametes and embryos: Legal issues and practical considerations. Fertil. Steril. 115, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.025 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.025
pubmed: 33579521
Simione, F. & Sharp, T. Best practices for storing and shipping cryopreserved cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 53, 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-017-0214-6 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s11626-017-0214-6
pubmed: 29238935
Simon C., Campbell A., Gardner D.K., Meseguer M., Miller K.A., Montag M., Palermo G.D., Cheung S., Keating D., Xie P., Rosenwaks Z., Rienzi L., Innocenti F., Cimadomo D., Ubaldi F.M., Sakkas D., Tucker M.J., Nel-Themaat L. In vitro fertilization and andrology laboratories in 2030. Fertil. Steril., 116:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.089 (2021;). Erratum in: Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116:917
Tomlinson, M. J. Safe storage of gametes and embryos: No time for complacency. Semin. Reprod. Med. 36, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678596 (2018).
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678596
pubmed: 30947345
Collins, M. G. et al. Working with fatigue: Assessment of cryomanagement conditions in IVF biorepositories. Fertil. Steril. 118(4), E124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.368 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.368
Gupta, R. et al. A collaborative assessment to measure variance in cryospecimen retrieval methods across multiple IVF clinics. Fertil. Steril. 116(3), E377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1013 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1013
Moutos, C. P., Lahham, R. & Phelps, J. Y. Cryostorage failures: A medicolegal review. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 36(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01478-x
pubmed: 31127476
pmcid: 6603075
López-Regalado, M. L., Olvera, C., Martínez, L. & Castilla, J. A. Embryologists’ health: A nationwide online questionnaire. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 31, 1587–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0352-7 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0352-7
pubmed: 25284212
pmcid: 4250470
Murphy, A. et al. Embryologist burnout: physical and psychological symptoms and occupational challenges currently reported by U.S. embryologists. Fertil. Steril. 118(4), E66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.205 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.205
Murphy, A. et al. Comparison of embryologist stress, fatigue, and burnout currently reported by U.K. and U.S embryologists. Fertil. Steril. 120(4), E265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.779 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.779
Murphy, A. et al. The occupational challenges reported by UK embryologists: Stress, fatigue, and burnout. Hum. Reprod. 38(Supplement_1), dead093.906. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead093.906 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead093.906
Palmer, G. et al. Occupational demands and resultant stress of reproductive scientists: Outcomes from an international survey. Fertility 2022, January 5–8 (ACC Liverpool, UK, 2022).
Priddle, H., Pickup, S., Hayes, C., Association of Reproductive and Clinical Scientists (ARCS). Occupational health issues experienced by UK embryologists: Informing improvements in clinical reproductive science practice. Hum. Fertil. 25, 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1871782 (2022).
doi: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1871782
Nesbit, C., Blanchette, P. M. & Esfandiari, N. Catastrophic human error in assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review. J. Patient Saf. 18, E267–E274. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000763 (2022).
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000763
pubmed: 33208638
Campbell, L. D. et al. The 2018 revision of the ISBER best practices: Summary of changes and the editorial team’s development process. Biopreserv. Biobank 16(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2018.0001 (2018).
doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0001
pubmed: 29393664
pmcid: 5846567
Mochida, K. et al. High osmolality vitrification: A new method for the simple and temperature-permissive cryopreservation of mouse embryos. PLoS One 8(1), E49316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049316 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049316
pubmed: 23341870
pmcid: 3547031
Sansinena, M., Santos, M. V., Taminelli, G. & Zaritky, N. Implications of storage and handling conditions on glass transition and potential devitrification of oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology 82(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.003 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.003
pubmed: 24861980