Characterisation of aphid antixenosis in aphid-resistant ancestor wheat, Triticum monococcum.
Sitobion avenae
Triticum monococcum
antixenosis
aphid resistance
volatile organic compounds
wheat
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised:
01
08
2024
received:
17
05
2024
accepted:
06
08
2024
medline:
17
8
2024
pubmed:
17
8
2024
entrez:
17
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Due to the increasing presence of insecticide resistance across cereal aphid populations, new aphid management strategies, including the engineering of host resistance to aphids into commercial wheat varieties, are required. Previous studies have identified ancestor wheat, Triticum monococcum accessions MDR045 and MDR049, with resistance against the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. To test the hypothesis that resistance can be accounted for by antixenosis (reduced attractiveness of host plants) via the release of repellent volatile organic compounds (VOCs), we explored the response of S. avenae to MDR045 and MDR049 following S. avenae herbivory, using behaviour and electrophysiology experiments. In four-arm olfactometry assays, alate S. avenae showed aphid density-dependent reduced preference to VOC extracts from T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049. By contrast, alate S. avenae showed aphid density-dependent increased preference to extracts from aphid-susceptible hexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum var. Solstice and T. monococcum MDR037. Coupled gas chromatography-electroantennography (GC-EAG), using the antennae of alate S. avenae, located 24 electrophysiologically active compounds across all tested accessions. Synthetic blends created from 21 identified EAG-active compounds confirmed bioactivity of corresponding VOC extracts in four-arm olfactometry assays against alate S. avenae. Our data suggest that resistance of T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049 to S. avenae can be at least partially accounted for by antixenosis through antennal perception of specific repellent VOC blends induced by S. avenae feeding behaviour. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Due to the increasing presence of insecticide resistance across cereal aphid populations, new aphid management strategies, including the engineering of host resistance to aphids into commercial wheat varieties, are required. Previous studies have identified ancestor wheat, Triticum monococcum accessions MDR045 and MDR049, with resistance against the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. To test the hypothesis that resistance can be accounted for by antixenosis (reduced attractiveness of host plants) via the release of repellent volatile organic compounds (VOCs), we explored the response of S. avenae to MDR045 and MDR049 following S. avenae herbivory, using behaviour and electrophysiology experiments.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In four-arm olfactometry assays, alate S. avenae showed aphid density-dependent reduced preference to VOC extracts from T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049. By contrast, alate S. avenae showed aphid density-dependent increased preference to extracts from aphid-susceptible hexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum var. Solstice and T. monococcum MDR037. Coupled gas chromatography-electroantennography (GC-EAG), using the antennae of alate S. avenae, located 24 electrophysiologically active compounds across all tested accessions. Synthetic blends created from 21 identified EAG-active compounds confirmed bioactivity of corresponding VOC extracts in four-arm olfactometry assays against alate S. avenae.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that resistance of T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049 to S. avenae can be at least partially accounted for by antixenosis through antennal perception of specific repellent VOC blends induced by S. avenae feeding behaviour. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Gildow FE and Rochow WF, Barley yellow dwarf in California: vector competence and Luteovirus identification. Plant Dis 67:140–143 (1982).
Rabbinge R, Drees EM, van der Graaf M, Verberne FCM and Wesselo A, Damage effects of cereal aphids in wheat. Netherlands J Plant Pathol 87:217–232 (1981).
Aradottir GI and Crespo‐Herrera L, Host plant resistance in wheat to barley yellow dwarf viruses and their aphid vectors: a review. Curr Opin Insect Sci 45:59–68 (2021).
Tanguy S and Dedryver CA, Reduced BYDV‐PAV transmission by the grain aphid in a Triticum monococcum line. Eur J Plant Pathol 123:281–289 (2009).
Foster SP, Paul VL, Slater R, Warren A, Denholm I, Field LM et al., A mutation (L1014F) in the voltage‐gated sodium channel of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae, is associated with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Pest Manag Sci 70:1249–1253 (2014).
Pickett JA, Food security: intensification of agriculture is essential, for which current tools must be defended and new sustainable technologies invented. Food Energy Secur 2:167–173 (2013).
Sparks TC, Insecticide discovery: An evaluation and analysis. Pestic Biochem Physiol 107:8–17 (2013).
Tolmay VL, Sydenham SL, Sikhakhane TN, Nhlapho BN and Tsilo TJ, Elusive diagnostic markers for Russian wheat aphid resistance in bread wheat: deliberating and reviewing the status quo. Int J Mol Sci 21:1–22 (2020).
Walls J, Rajotte E and Rosa C, The past, present, and future of barley yellow dwarf management. Agri 9:1–16 (2019).
Zhang Y, Fan J, Francis F and Chen J, Watery saliva secreted by the grain aphid sitobion avenae stimulates aphid resistance in wheat. J Agric Food Chem 65:8798–8805 (2017).
Correa LDJ, Maciel OVB, Bücker‐Neto L, Pilati L, Morozini AM, Faria MV et al., A comprehensive analysis of wheat resistance to rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Brazilian wheat cultivars. J Econ Entomol 113:1493–1503 (2020).
Zhang KX, Li HY, Quandahor P, Gou YP, Li CC, Zhang QY et al., Responses of six wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum) to wheat aphid (Sitobion avenae) infestation. Insects 13 (2022).
Mansouri SM, Norouzi R and Mehrparvar M, Resistance of wild wheat, Triticum boeoticum Boiss. to Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) (Hem.: Aphididae). North West J Zool 15:1–6 (2019).
Radchenko EE, Resistance of Triticum species to cereal aphids. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 47:2009–2012 (2011).
Migui SM and Lamb RJ, Patterns of resistance to three cereal aphids among wheats in the genus Triticum (Poaceae). Bull Entomol Res 93:323–333 (2003).
Elek H, Werner P, Smart L, Gordon‐Weeks R, Nádasy M and Pickett J, Aphid resistance in wheat varieties. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 74:233–241 (2009).
Singh B, Simon A, Halsey K, Kurup S, Clark S and Aradottir GI, Characterisation of bird cherry‐oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L.) behaviour and aphid host preference in relation to partially resistant and susceptible wheat landraces. Ann Appl Biol 177:184–194 (2020).
Simon AL, Caulfield JC, Hammond‐Kosack KE, Field LM and Aradottir GI, Identifying aphid resistance in the ancestral wheat Triticum monococcum under field conditions. Sci Rep 11:1–12 (2021).
Simon AL, Wellham PAD, Aradottir GI and Gange AC, Unravelling mycorrhiza‐induced wheat susceptibility to the English grain aphid Sitobion avenae. Sci Rep 7:1–11 (2017).
Greenslade AFC, Ward JL, Martin JL, Corol DI, Clark SJ, Smart LE et al., Triticum monococcum lines with distinct metabolic phenotypes and phloem‐based partial resistance to the bird cherry‐oat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Ann Appl Biol 168:435–449 (2016).
Haas M, Schreiber M and Mascher M, Domestication and crop evolution of wheat and barley: genes, genomics, and future directions. J Integr Plant Biol 61:204–225 (2019).
Simon AL, Unravelling Cereal Aphid Interactions with Ancestral Wheat Triticum Monococcum [Thesis (PhD)]. University of Nottingham, Nottingham (2020).
Dicke M and Baldwin IT, The evolutionary context for herbivore‐induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends Plant Sci 15:167–175 (2010).
Webster B, The role of olfaction in aphid host location. Physiol Entomol 37:10–18 (2012).
Turlings TCJ and Erb M, Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore‐induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu Rev Entomol 63:433–452 (2018).
Moraes MCB, Laumann RA, Pareja M, Sereno FTPS, Michereff MFF, Birkett MA et al., Attraction of the stink bug egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi to defence signals from soybean activated by treatment with cis‐jasmone. Entomol Exp Appl 131:178–188 (2009).
Zhou S and Jander G, Molecular ecology of plant volatiles in interactions with insect herbivores. J Exp Bot 73:449–462 (2022).
Pickett JA and Khan ZR, Plant volatile‐mediated signalling and its application in agriculture: successes and challenges. New Phytol 212:856–870 (2016).
Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H and Gao C, CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol 70:667–697 (2019).
Bruce TJA, Aradottir GI, Smart LE, Martin JL, Caulfield JC, Doherty A et al., The first crop plant genetically engineered to release an insect pheromone for defence. Sci Rep 5:1–9 (2015).
Li F, Li W, Lin YJ, Pickett JA, Birkett MA, Wu K et al., Expression of lima bean terpene synthases in rice enhances recruitment of a beneficial enemy of a major rice pest. Plant Cell Environ 41:111–120 (2018).
Zhang L, Lu G, Huang X, Guo H, Su X, Han L et al., Overexpression of the caryophyllene synthase gene GhTPS1 in cotton negatively affects multiple pests while attracting parasitoids. Pest Manag Sci 76:1722–1730 (2020).
MacGillivray ME and Anderson GB, Three useful insect cages. Can Entomol 89:43–46 (1957).
Pettersson J, An aphid sex attractant. Insect Syst Evol 1:63–73 (1970).
Wadhams LJ, The use of coupled gas chromatography: electrophysiological techniques in the identification of insect pheromones, in Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and Pheromones. Chromatographic Society Symposium Series, ed. by McCaffery AR and Wilson ID. Springer, New York, NY (1990).
Pickett JA, Gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry in insect pheromone identification: three extreme case histories, in Chromatography and Isolation of Insect Hormones and Pheromones. Chromatographic Society Symposium Series, ed. by McCaffery AR and Wilson ID. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 299–309 (1990).
Kost C and Heil M, Herbivore‐induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighbouring plants. J Ecol 94:619–628 (2006).
Arkoudis E and Stratakis M, Synthesis of cordiaquinones B, C, J, and K on the basis of a bioinspired approach and the revision of the relative stereochemistry of cordiaquinone C. J Org Chem 73:4484–4490 (2008).
Team RC, R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2023). https://www.r-project.org/.
Oksansen J, Simspon G, Blanchet G, Kindt R and Legendre P, vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6‐4 (2022). https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
Kassambara A and Mundt F, factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7 (2020). https://cran.r-project.org/package=factoextra.
Thévenot EA, Roux A, Xu Y, Ezan E and Junot C, Analysis of the human adult urinary metabolome variations with age, body mass index, and gender by implementing a comprehensive workflow for univariate and OPLS statistical analyses. J Proteome Res 14:3322–3335 (2015).
Pettersson J, Quiroz A and Fahad AE, Aphid antixenosis mediated by volatiles in cereals. Acta Agric Scand Sect B soil Plant Sci 46:135–140 (1996).
Hu XS, Liu Y‐J, Wang Y‐H, Wang Z, Yu X‐l, Wang B et al., Resistance of wheat accessions to the english grain aphid Sitobion avenae. PLoS One 11:1–17 (2016).
Quiroz A and Niemeyer HM, Olfactometer‐assessed responses of aphid Rhopalosiphum padi to wheat and oat volatiles. J Chem Ecol 24:113–124 (1998).
Quiroz A, Pettersson J, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ and Niemeyer HM, Semiochemicals mediating spacing behavior of bird cherry‐oat aphid. J Chem Ecol 23:2599–2607 (1997).
Schröder ML, Glinwood R, Webster B, Ignell R and Krüger K, Olfactory responses of Rhopalosiphum padi to three maize, potato, and wheat cultivars and the selection of prospective crop border plants. Entomol Exp Appl 157:241–253 (2015).
Gebretsadik KG, Zhang Y and Chen J, Screening and evaluation for antixenosis resistance in wheat accessions and varieties to grain aphid, Sitobion miscanthi (Takahashi) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Plants 11 (2022).
Hesler LS and Tharp CI, Antibiosis and antixenosis to Rhopalosiphum padi among triticale accessions. Euphytica 143:153–160 (2005).
Truong DH, Delory BM, Vanderplanck M et al., Temperature regimes and aphid density interactions differentially influence VOC emissions in Arabidopsis. Arthropod Plant Interact 8:317–327 (2014).
Morkunas I, Mai VC and Gabryś B, Phytohormonal signaling in plant responses to aphid feeding. Acta Physiol Plant 33:2057–2073 (2011).
Stewart SA, Hodge S, Bennett M, Mansfield JW and Powell G, Aphid induction of phytohormones in Medicago truncatula is dependent upon time post‐infestation, aphid density and the genotypes of both plant and insect. Arthropod Plant Interact 10:41–53 (2016).
Mitchell C, Johnson SN, Gordon SC, Birch ANE and Hubbard SF, Combining plant resistance and a natural enemy to control Amphorophora idaei. BioControl 55:321–327 (2010).
Kieckhefer RW and Gellner JL, Yield losses in winter wheat caused by low‐density cereal aphid populations. Agron J 84:180–183 (1992).
Birkett MA, Chamberlain K, Khan ZR, Pickett JA, Toshova T, Wadhams LJ et al., Electrophysiological responses of the lepidopterous stemborers Chilo partellus and Busseola fusca to volatiles from wild and cultivated host plants. J Chem Ecol 32:2475–2487 (2006).
Bruce TJA and Pickett JA, Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects—finding the right mix. Phytochemistry 72:1605–1611 (2011).
Webster B, Bruce T, Dufour S, Birkemeyer C, Birkett M, Hardie J et al., Identification of volatile compounds used in host location by the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. J Chem Ecol 34:1153–1161 (2008).
Webster B, Bruce T, Pickett J and Hardie J, Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Anim Behav 79:451–457 (2010).
Webster B, Bruce T, Pickett J and Hardie J, Olfactory recognition of host plants in the absence of host‐specific volatile compounds. Commun Integr Biol 1:167–169 (2008).
Campbell CAM, Pettersson J, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ and Woodcock CM, Spring migration of damson‐hop aphid, Phorodon humuli (Homoptera, Aphididae), and summer host plant‐derived semiochemicals released on feeding. J Chem Ecol 19:1569–1576 (1993).
van Wijk M, de Bruijn PJA and Sabelis MW, Complex odor from plants under attack: Herbivore's enemies react to the whole, not its parts. PLoS One 6:e21742 (2011).
Webster B, Gezan S, Bruce T, Hardie J and Pickett J, Between plant and diurnal variation in quantities and ratios of volatile compounds emitted by Vicia faba plants. Phytochemistry 71:81–89 (2010).
Kong M, An J, Jung D and Hong T, Characterization of the aroma in barley leaves from different cultivars and tillering stages by HS‐SPME/GC‐MS, GC‐O and E‐nose. Food Biosci 60:104117 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104117.
Azam M, Jiang Q, Zhang B, Xu C and Chen K, Citrus leaf volatiles as affected by developmental stage and genetic type. Int J Mol Sci 14:17744–17766 (2013).
Allmann S, Späthe A, Bisch‐Knaden S, Kallenbach M, Reinecke A, Sachse S et al., Feeding‐induced rearrangement of green leaf volatiles reduces moth oviposition. Elife 2:e00421 (2013).
Schuman MC, Barthel K and Baldwin IT, Herbivory‐induced volatiles function as defenses increasing fitness of the native plant Nicotiana attenuata in nature. Elife 2012:1–29 (2012).
De Moraes CM, Lewis WJ, Pare PW, Alborn HT and Tumiinson JH, Herbivore‐infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393:570–573 (1998).
Yi HS, Heil M, Adame‐Álvarez RM, Ballhorn DJ and Ryu CM, Airborne induction and priming of plant defenses against a bacterial pathogen. Plant Physiol 151:2152–2161 (2009).
Zhu X, Li L, Hsiang T, Zha Y, Zhou Z, Chen R et al., Chemical composition and attractant activity of volatiles from Rhus potaninii to the spring aphid Kaburagia rhusicola. Molecules 25 (2020).
Medina‐Ortega KJ, Bosque‐Pérez NA, Ngumbi E, Jiménez‐Martínez ES and Eigenbrode SD, Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) responses to volatile cues from barley yellow dwarf virus–infected wheat. Environ Entomol 38:836–845 (2009).
Hu Z, Chai R, Liu X, Dong Y, Su D, Desneux N et al., Barley yellow dwarf virus‐infected wheat plant modulated selection behavior of vector aphids. J Pest Sci 2004:1273–1285 (2022).
Leroy PD, Schillings T, Farmakidis J and Lognay G, Testing semiochemicals from aphid, plant and conspecific: attraction of Harmonia axyridis. Insect Sci 19:372–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01449.x.
Sasso R, Iodice L, Cristina Digilio M, Carretta A, Ariati L and Guerrieri E, Host‐locating response by the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi to tomato plant volatiles. J Plant Interact 9145:175–183 (2008).
Goelen T, Vuts J, Sobhy IS, Wäckers F, Caulfield JC, Birkett MA et al., Identification and application of bacterial volatiles to attract a generalist aphid parasitoid: from laboratory to greenhouse assays. Pest Manag Sci 77:930–938 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6102.