Ten-year trends in characteristics, management and outcomes of patients admitted with cardiogenic shock in the ACTION-SHOCK cohort.

Cardiac intensive care unit Cardiogenic shock Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Heart failure Management

Journal

Archives of cardiovascular diseases
ISSN: 1875-2128
Titre abrégé: Arch Cardiovasc Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101465655

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 27 05 2024
revised: 23 07 2024
accepted: 24 07 2024
medline: 18 8 2024
pubmed: 18 8 2024
entrez: 17 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The ACTION-SHOCK registry offers a decade-long perspective on patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS). To assess trends in the management and outcomes of patients with CS over 10 years. Trends in the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with CS admitted into the cardiac intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from 2011 to 2020 were analysed. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device. Long-term outcomes were all-cause death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year. Over a 10-year period, data from 700 patients with CS (median [interquartile range] age 61 [50-72] years; 73% of men) were analysed. The proportion of CS related to acute myocardial infarction decreased (from 45% in 2011-2012 to 27% in 2019-2020) while the proportions related to chronic coronary syndrome (18% to 23%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies (37 to 51%) increased (P<0.01). The use of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained stable (19 to 14%) and intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (22% to 7%) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality remained stable (27 to 29%) as did the proportions of patients discharged after transplantation (17 to 14%) or with a durable ventricular assist device (2 to 4%). Among patients discharged alive, death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year remained high (37 to 47%). CS remained associated with a poor prognosis over the last decade. There are significant unmet needs in the management strategies of patients with CS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The ACTION-SHOCK registry offers a decade-long perspective on patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS).
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To assess trends in the management and outcomes of patients with CS over 10 years.
METHODS METHODS
Trends in the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with CS admitted into the cardiac intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from 2011 to 2020 were analysed. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device. Long-term outcomes were all-cause death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over a 10-year period, data from 700 patients with CS (median [interquartile range] age 61 [50-72] years; 73% of men) were analysed. The proportion of CS related to acute myocardial infarction decreased (from 45% in 2011-2012 to 27% in 2019-2020) while the proportions related to chronic coronary syndrome (18% to 23%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies (37 to 51%) increased (P<0.01). The use of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained stable (19 to 14%) and intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (22% to 7%) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality remained stable (27 to 29%) as did the proportions of patients discharged after transplantation (17 to 14%) or with a durable ventricular assist device (2 to 4%). Among patients discharged alive, death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year remained high (37 to 47%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CS remained associated with a poor prognosis over the last decade. There are significant unmet needs in the management strategies of patients with CS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39153876
pii: S1875-2136(24)00280-8
doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.07.059
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

David Sulman (D)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Frederic Beaupré (F)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Perrine Devos (P)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Niki Procopi (N)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Mathieu Kerneis (M)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Paul Guedeney (P)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Olivier Barthélémy (O)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Anthony Elhadad (A)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Stephanie Rouanet (S)

Statistician Unit, StatEthic, ACTION Study Group, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France.

Delphine Brugier (D)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Guillaume Hekimian (G)

Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, institut de cardiologie, université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France.

Juliette Chommeloux (J)

Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, institut de cardiologie, université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France.

Alain Combes (A)

Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, institut de cardiologie, université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France.

Johanne Silvain (J)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Jean-Philippe Collet (JP)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Gilles Montalescot (G)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. Electronic address: gilles.montalescot@aphp.fr.

Michel Zeitouni (M)

Département de cardiologie, institut de cardiologie, ACTION Study Group, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1166, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH