Prevalence of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth related to different Thai cleft lip and cleft palate populations.
Cleft lip and cleft palate
Cleft sidedness
Dentofacial deformity
Supernumerary teeth
Tooth agenesis code (TAC)
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
21
11
2023
accepted:
08
08
2024
medline:
18
8
2024
pubmed:
18
8
2024
entrez:
17
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type. Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05). Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients. More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pattern of dental anomalies encountered in cleft patients shows subtle signs of genetic involvement. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and pattern of tooth agenesis and supernumerary teeth in Thai cleft population according to the cleft type.
METHODS
METHODS
Data collected from patients with cleft lip and palate, who had been treated at Tawanchai Cleft Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, available during year 2012-2022, were investigated. Records from 194 patients with non-syndromic clefts met the inclusion criteria. Standard dental records, and at least either orthopantomogram (OPG) or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Prevalence of tooth agenesis was higher (77.3%) than that of supernumerary teeth (5.7%) and was more common in bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) (88.1%) than in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) (72.6%) (p = 0.017). The upper lateral incisor was more frequently affected (46.4%), followed by the upper second premolar. The number of missing teeth observed on the left side was significantly higher. Patients with left UCLP (ULCLP) had the highest prevalence of tooth agenesis. A total of 41 tooth agenesis code (TAC) patterns was found. The prevalence of supernumerary teeth was comparable with 6.6% of ULCLP, 5.1% of BCLP, and 4.5% of URCLP. Tooth-number anomalies were observed more often in the BCLP and were most likely to occur on the left side of the maxilla. Both types of anomalies could be featured in a small proportion of cleft patients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
More than half of the patients with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate in this study, presented with tooth-number anomalies. Tooth agenesis was approximately 10-time more prevalent than supernumerary teeth. Tooth agenesis was likely to appear on the left-side of the maxilla regardless of the laterality of the cleft.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39153972
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04719-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
960Subventions
Organisme : Center of Cleft Lip-Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities, Khon Kaen University in association with Tawanchai Project (Tawanchai Center)
ID : TWG6601
Organisme : Center of Cleft Lip-Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities, Khon Kaen University in association with Tawanchai Project (Tawanchai Center)
ID : TWG6601
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Salari N, Darvishi N, Heydari M, Bokaee S, Darvishi F, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(2):110–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008
pubmed: 34033944
Fuangtharnthip P, Chonnapasatid W, Thiradilok S, Manopatanakul S, Jaruratanasirikul S. Registry-based study of Prevalence of Cleft Lip/Palate in Thailand from 2012 to 2015. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(11):1430–7.
doi: 10.1177/1055665620987677
pubmed: 33486980
Marzouk T, Alves IL, Wong CL, DeLucia L, McKinney CM, Pendleton C, et al. Association between Dental anomalies and Orofacial clefts: a Meta-analysis. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021;6(4):368–81.
pubmed: 33030085
Howe BJ, Cooper ME, Vieira AR, Weinberg SM, Resick JM, Nidey NL, et al. Spectrum of dental phenotypes in nonsyndromic orofacial clefting. J Dent Res. 2015;94(7):905–12.
doi: 10.1177/0022034515588281
pubmed: 26082386
pmcid: 4530345
Fonseca-Souza G, de Oliveira LB, Wambier LM, Scariot R, Feltrin-Souza J. Tooth abnormalities associated with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;6:5089–103.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04540-8
Möller LH, Pradel W, Gedrange T, Botzenhart UU. Prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in a German cleft lip with/without palate population. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1).
Garib DG, Rosar JP, Sathler R, Ozawa TO. Dual embryonic origin of maxillary lateral incisors: clinical implications in patients with cleft lip and palate. Dent Press J Orthod. 2015;20(5):118–25.
doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.118-125.sar
Zhang H, Gong X, Xu X, Wang X, Sun Y. Tooth number abnormality: from bench to bedside. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(5).
Duke A, Paterson M, Ashley P, MacNab M. The genetic basis of hypodontia in dental development. Br Dent J. 2023;235(7):525–8.
doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6384-6
pubmed: 37828195
Korolenkova MV, Starikova NV, Udalova NV. The role of external aetiological factors in dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(2):105–11.
doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0397-x
pubmed: 30511277
Antonarakis GS, Fisher DM. Permanent tooth agenesis and maxillary hypoplasia in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):648–56.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001694
Zhao Y, Chen S, Liu X, Chen X, Yang D, Zhang J, et al. Single-cell RNA‐seq of in vitro expanded cells from cranial neural crest reveals a rare odontogenic sub‐population. Cell Prolif. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13598 .
doi: 10.1111/cpr.13598
pubmed: 39087342
pmcid: 11294442
Van Wijk AJ, Tan SPK. A numeric code for identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis: a new approach. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114(2):97–101.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00340.x
pubmed: 16630299
Bartzela TN, Carels C, Maltha JC. Update on 13 syndromes affecting craniofacial and dental structures. Front Physiol. 2017;8.
de Oliveira Júnior AG, Montagna E, Zaia V, Barbosa CP, Bianco B. Oral health-related quality of life in patients aged 8 to 19 years with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):670.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03382-4
pubmed: 37716942
pmcid: 10505326
Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E, Macfarlane TV. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod. 2014;41:299–316.
doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000116
pubmed: 25404667
Anthonappa RP, King NM, Rabie ABM. Aetiology of supernumerary teeth: a literature review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14:279–88.
doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0082-z
pubmed: 24068489
Pradubwong S, Augsornwan D, Namjaitaharn S, Saenbon O, Wongkham J, Muknumporn T, et al. Update interdisciplinary clinical practice guideline for patients with cleft lip and palate at prenatal until 5 years. SRIMEDJ. 2020;35(6):700–6.
Germec Cakan D, Nur Yilmaz RB, Bulut FN, Aksoy A. Dental anomalies in different types of cleft lip and palate: is there any relation? J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(5):1316–21.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004359
pubmed: 29485555
Mangione F, Nguyen L, Foumou N, Bocquet E, Dursun E. Cleft palate with/without cleft lip in French children: radiographic evaluation of prevalence, location and coexistence of dental anomalies inside and outside cleft region. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):689–95.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2141-z
pubmed: 28589475
Suzuki A, Nakano M, Yoshizaki K, Yasunaga A, Haruyama N, Takahashi I. A longitudinal study of the presence of dental anomalies in the primary and permanent dentitions of cleft lip and/or palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(3):309–20.
doi: 10.1597/15-186
pubmed: 27031269
Tan ELY, Kuek MC, Wong HC, Ong SAK, Yow M. Secondary dentition characteristics in children with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(4):582–9.
doi: 10.1177/1055665617750489
pubmed: 29554450
Chang CH, Chang CH, Lai JP, Lin SS, Chang YJ. Prevalence of Dental anomalies in Taiwanese Children with Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1708.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12101708
pubmed: 36294847
pmcid: 9605298
Pradhan L, Shakya P, Thapa S, Nakarmi KK, Maharjan A, Sagtani RA, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in the patient with cleft lip and palate visiting a tertiary care hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58(228):591–6.
pubmed: 32968294
pmcid: 7580371
Konstantonis D, Nassika M, Athanasiou M, Vastardis H. Subphenotypes in non-syndromic Orofacial Cleft patients based on the tooth agenesis code (TAC). Children. 2022;9(3).
López-Giménez A, Silvestre-Rangil J, Silvestre FJ, Paredes-Gallardo V. Tooth agenesis code (TAC) in complete unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Odontology. 2018;106(3):257–65.
doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0332-3
pubmed: 29243181
Phan M, Conte F, Khandelwal KD, Ockeloen CW, Bartzela T, Kleefstra T, et al. Tooth agenesis and orofacial clefting: genetic brothers in arms? Hum Genet. 2016;135:1299–327.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1733-z
pubmed: 27699475
pmcid: 5065589
Sæle P, Østhus E, Ådalen S, Nasir EF, Mustafa M. Pattern of clefts and dental anomalies in six-year-old children: a retrospective observational study in western Norway. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(2):100–5.
doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1260770
pubmed: 27897086
Pastuszak P, Dunin-Wilczyńska I, Lasota A. Frequency of additional congenital dental anomalies in children with cleft lip, alveolar and palate. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):1–10.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9123813
Jamilian A, Lucchese A, Darnahal A, Kamali Z, Perillo L. Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate patients. Prog Orthod. 2016;17(1).
Crawford J, Morawski M, Eliason S, Wuebker S, Van Otterloo E, Cao H, et al. Transcriptome analyses of murine right and left maxilla–mandibular complex. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023;00:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12660 .
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12660
Laugel-Haushalter V, Paschaki M, Thibault-Carpentier C, Dembelé D, Dollé P, Bloch-Zupan A. Molars and incisors: show your microarray IDs. BMC Res Notes. 2013;113(6).
Forrest K, Barricella AC, Pohar SA, Hinman AM, Amack JD. Understanding laterality disorders and the left-right organizer: insights from zebrafish. Front Cell Dev Bio. 2022;10.
Miller SF, Weinberg SM, Nidey NL, Defay DK, Marazita ML, Wehby GL, et al. Exploratory genotype-phenotype correlations of facial form and asymmetry in unaffected relatives of children with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate. J Anat. 2014;224(6):688–709.
doi: 10.1111/joa.12182
pubmed: 24738728
pmcid: 4025896
Cheng L, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Yuan Z, Han X. The clinical and genetic findings in a Chinese family with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. Heliyon. 2022;8(12).