Buprenorphine treatment and clinical outcomes under the opioid use disorder cascade of care.

Buprenorphine Clinical care pathways Disorder Medication for opioid use OUD Cascade of Care Opioid use disorder

Journal

Drug and alcohol dependence
ISSN: 1879-0046
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Depend
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7513587

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 23 01 2024
revised: 23 07 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 19 8 2024
pubmed: 19 8 2024
entrez: 18 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Challenges to engagement and retention on buprenorphine undermine treatment of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Under the OUD Cascade of Care framework, we sought to identify patient characteristics and treatment response associated with superior clinical outcomes. A retrospective cohort study of specialty buprenorphine treatment patients entering treatment (n=19,487) based on EHR records from a large multi-state buprenorphine treatment network (2011-2019). Person-level care episodes were evaluated across treatment intake, engagement (i.e. 2+ visits in the month following intake), and retention at 6, 12, and 24 months. Time to achieving 90 days of continuous opioid abstinence was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regressions models and also assessed as a predictor of long-term retention. Most patients engaged (82.4 %), but retention steadily declined over 6-month (38.7 %), 12-month (26.2 %), and 24-month (17.1 %) timepoints. Opioid-positive baseline tests were associated with lower hazards of achieving continuous abstinence for both buprenorphine-positive (aHR=0.33, p<.001) and buprenorphine-negative (aHR=0.49,p<.001) intakes. Opioid abstinence was associated with buprenorphine-positive baseline testing (aHR=1.59,p<.001), especially for those testing opioid-negative (aHR=1.82,p<.001). Patients who achieved and sustained abstinence at 6 months in care were 4.1 and 5.5 times as likely to achieve 12-month and 24-month retention, respectively, compared to patients with intermittent opioid use. Treatment discontinuation was concentrated early in care and buprenorphine and opioid status at intake were prognostic of achieving and sustaining abstinence. Early abstinence was associated with higher likelihood of subsequent stage progression. Implementing interventions to support early clinical stability for high-risk patients is critical to improve clinical outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Challenges to engagement and retention on buprenorphine undermine treatment of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Under the OUD Cascade of Care framework, we sought to identify patient characteristics and treatment response associated with superior clinical outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective cohort study of specialty buprenorphine treatment patients entering treatment (n=19,487) based on EHR records from a large multi-state buprenorphine treatment network (2011-2019). Person-level care episodes were evaluated across treatment intake, engagement (i.e. 2+ visits in the month following intake), and retention at 6, 12, and 24 months. Time to achieving 90 days of continuous opioid abstinence was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regressions models and also assessed as a predictor of long-term retention.
RESULTS RESULTS
Most patients engaged (82.4 %), but retention steadily declined over 6-month (38.7 %), 12-month (26.2 %), and 24-month (17.1 %) timepoints. Opioid-positive baseline tests were associated with lower hazards of achieving continuous abstinence for both buprenorphine-positive (aHR=0.33, p<.001) and buprenorphine-negative (aHR=0.49,p<.001) intakes. Opioid abstinence was associated with buprenorphine-positive baseline testing (aHR=1.59,p<.001), especially for those testing opioid-negative (aHR=1.82,p<.001). Patients who achieved and sustained abstinence at 6 months in care were 4.1 and 5.5 times as likely to achieve 12-month and 24-month retention, respectively, compared to patients with intermittent opioid use.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Treatment discontinuation was concentrated early in care and buprenorphine and opioid status at intake were prognostic of achieving and sustaining abstinence. Early abstinence was associated with higher likelihood of subsequent stage progression. Implementing interventions to support early clinical stability for high-risk patients is critical to improve clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39154558
pii: S0376-8716(24)01314-0
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112389
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

112389

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Arthur Robin Williams (AR)

Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States; Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: aw2879@cumc.columbia.edu.

Christine M Mauro (CM)

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W. 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Lisa Chiodo (L)

Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA 01062, United States; North-Star Care, Inc., 4810 Point Fosdick Dr. Suite #92, Gig Harbor, WA 98335, United States; University of Massachusetts Amherst, School of Nursing, 651 N Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.

Ben Huber (B)

Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Angelo Cruz (A)

Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA 01062, United States.

Stephen Crystal (S)

Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.

Hillary Samples (H)

Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.

Molly Nowels (M)

Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.

Amanda Wilson (A)

Addiction Research and Education Foundation, 46 Sovereign Way, Florence, MA 01062, United States; North-Star Care, Inc., 4810 Point Fosdick Dr. Suite #92, Gig Harbor, WA 98335, United States.

Peter D Friedmann (PD)

UMass Chan Medical School - Baystate, United States.

Robert H Remien (RH)

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W. 168th St, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Mark Olfson (M)

Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States; Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Classifications MeSH