The association of intravenous vs. humeral-intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.


Journal

Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 06 06 2024
revised: 16 07 2024
accepted: 11 08 2024
medline: 19 8 2024
pubmed: 19 8 2024
entrez: 18 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

While intravenous (IV) vascular access for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is standard, humeral-intraosseous (IO) access is commonly used, despite few supporting data. We investigated the association between IV vs. humeral-IO and outcomes. We utilized BC Cardiac Arrest Registry data, including adult OHCA where the first-attempted intra-arrest vascular access route performed by advanced life support (ALS)-trained paramedics was IV or humeral-IO. We fit a propensity-score adjusted model with inverse probability treatment weighting to estimate the association between IV vs. humeral-IO routes and favorable neurological outcomes (CPC 1-2) and survival at hospital discharge. We repeated models within subgroups defined by initial cardiac rhythm. We included 2,112 cases; the first-attempted route was IV (n=1,575) or humeral-IO (n=537). Time intervals from ALS-paramedic on-scene arrival to vascular access (6.6 vs. 6.9 minutes) and epinephrine administration (9.0 vs. 9.3 minutes) were similar between IV and IO groups. Among IV and humeral-IO groups, 98 (6.2%) and 20 (3.7%) had favorable neurological outcomes. Compared to humeral-IO, an IV-first approach was associated with improved hospital-discharge favorable neurological outcomes (AOR 1.7; 95%CI 1.1-2.7) and survival (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.0-2.3). Among shockable rhythm cases, an IV-first approach was associated with improved favorable neurological outcomes (AOR 4.2; 95%CI 2.1-8.2), but not among non-shockable rhythm cases (AOR 0.73; 95%CI 0.39-1.4). An IV-first approach, compared to humeral-IO, for intra-arrest resuscitation was associated with an improved odds of favorable neurological outcomes and survival to hospital discharge. This association was seen among an initial shockable rhythm, but not non-shockable rhythm, subgroups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39154890
pii: S0300-9572(24)00254-5
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110360
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110360

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Callahan Brebner (C)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Michael Asamoah-Boaheng (M)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C.

Bianca Zaidel (B)

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Justin Yap (J)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada.

Frank Scheuermeyer (F)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C.

Valerie Mok (V)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Jacob Hutton (J)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Emergency Health Services, British Columbia, Canada.

Garth Meckler (G)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Robert Schlamp (R)

British Columbia Emergency Health Services, British Columbia, Canada.

Jim Christenson (J)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C.

Brian Grunau (B)

British Columbia Resuscitation Research Collaborative, British Columbia, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C; British Columbia Emergency Health Services, British Columbia, Canada.

Classifications MeSH