Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic wastes in Northwest China for D-glucaric acid production by an artificial microbial consortium.

Consolidated bioprocessing D-glucaric acid Lignocellulose Pretreatment Switchgrass

Journal

Bioprocess and biosystems engineering
ISSN: 1615-7605
Titre abrégé: Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101088505

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 07 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 19 8 2024
pubmed: 19 8 2024
entrez: 19 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

D-glucaric acid is a platform chemical of great importance and the consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of lignocellulose by the microbial consortium of Trichoderma reesei C10 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae LGA-1C3S2 features prospects in biomanufacturing it. Here we compared some representative lignocelluloses in Northwest China including corn stover, wheat straw and switchgrass, and the leading pretreatments including steam explosion, subcritical water pretreatment, sodium hydroxide pretreatment, aqueous ammonia pretreatment, lime pretreatment, and diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment. It was found that sodium hydroxide pretreated switchgrass (SHPSG) was the best substrate for D-glucaric acid production, resulting in the highest D-glucaric acid titers, 11.69 ± 0.73 g/L in shake flask and 15.71 ± 0.80 g/L in 10L airlift fermenter, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest D-glucaric acid production titer from lignocellulosic biomass. This work offers a paradigm of producing low-cost D-glucaric acid for low-carbon polyethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate (PEF) and a reference on developing biorefinery in Northwest China.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1007/s00449-024-03081-6 PMID: 39158597
pubmed: 39158597
doi: 10.1007/s00449-024-03081-6
pii: 10.1007/s00449-024-03081-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 22007079
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 21808186
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
ID : 2018JQ2022
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
ID : 2020JQ-242
Organisme : ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center
ID : K02013020

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Doong SJ, Gupta A, Prather KLJ (2018) Layered dynamic regulation for improving metabolic pathway productivity in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:2964–2969
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716920115 pubmed: 29507236 pmcid: 5866568
Qu YN, Yan HJ, Guo Q, Li JL, Ruan YC, Yue XZ, Zheng WX, Tan TW, Fan LH (2018) Biosynthesis of D-glucaric acid from sucrose with routed carbon distribution in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 47:393–400
doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.020 pubmed: 29715517
Moon TS, Yoon SH, Lanza AM, Roy-Mayhew JD, Prather KL (2009) Production of glucaric acid from a synthetic pathway in recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:589–595
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00973-08 pubmed: 19060162
Zheng S, Hou J, Zhou Y, Fang H, Wang TT, Liu F, Wang FS, Sheng JZ (2018) One-pot two-strain system based on glucaric acid biosensor for rapid screening of myo-inositol oxygenase mutations and glucaric acid production in recombinant cells. Metab Eng 49:212–219
doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.08.005 pubmed: 30125674
Fang H, Deng Y, Pan Y, Li C, Yu L (2022) Distributive and collaborative push-and-pull in an artificial microbial consortium for improved consolidated bioprocessing. AIChE J. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17844
doi: 10.1002/aic.17844
Li C, Lin X, Ling X, Li S, Fang H (2021) Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose for production of glucaric acid by an artificial microbial consortium. Biotechnol Biofuels 14:110
doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01961-7 pubmed: 33931115 pmcid: 8086319
Fang H, Zhao C, Li C, Song Y, Yu L, Song X, Wu J, Yang L (2023) Direct consolidated bioprocessing for d-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose under subcritical water pretreatment. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140339
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140339
Zhao C, Deng L, Fang H, Chen S (2017) Microbial oil production by Mortierella isabellina from corn stover under different pretreatments. RSC Adv 7:56239–56246
doi: 10.1039/C7RA11900C
Fang H, Xia L (2015) Cellulase production by recombinant Trichoderma reesei and its application in enzymatic hydrolysis of agricultural residues. Fuel 143:211–216
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.056
Fang H, Zhao C, Kong Q, Zou Z, Chen N (2016) Comprehensive utilization and conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of long chain α, ω-dicarboxylic acids. Energy 116:177–189
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.110
Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 25:153–157
doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.02.009 pubmed: 17320227
Fang H, Zhao C, Song XY (2010) Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by two approaches: response surface methodology or using cellulase from mixed cultures of Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus niger NL02. Biores Technol 101:4111–4119
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.078
Fang H, Xia L (2013) High activity cellulase production by recombinant Trichoderma reesei ZU-02 with the enhanced cellobiohydrolase production. Biores Technol 144:693–697
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.120
Mandels M, Medeiros JE, Andreotti RE, Bissett FH (1981) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: evaluation of cellulase culture filtrates under use conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 23:2009–2026
doi: 10.1002/bit.260230907
Fang H, Zhao C, Song X-Y, Chen M, Chang Z, Chu J (2013) Enhanced cellulolytic enzyme production by the synergism between Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus niger NL02 and by the addition of surfactants. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18:390–398
doi: 10.1007/s12257-012-0562-8
Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268
doi: 10.1351/pac198759020257
Zhao X, Bian B, Huang C, Lai C, Song J, Jin Y, Meng X, Ragauskas A, Yong Q (2023) Elucidating the nonproductive adsorption mechanism of cellulase with lignin fractions from hydrothermally pretreated poplar using multi-dimensional spectroscopic technologies. Green Chem 25:6383–6397
doi: 10.1039/D3GC00907F
Ying W, Yang J, Zhang J (2022) In-situ modification of lignin in alkaline-pretreated sugarcane bagasse by sulfomethylation and carboxymethylation to improve the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. Ind Crop Prod 182:114863
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114863
Pant S, Ritika NP, Ghati A, Chakraborty D, Maximiano MR, Franco OL, Mandal AK, Kuila A (2022) Employment of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to improve cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Adv 60:108022
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108022 pubmed: 35870723
Fonseca LM, Parreiras LS, Murakami MT (2020) Rational engineering of the Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 strain into an industrially relevant platform for cellulase production. Biotechnol Biofuels 13:93
doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01732-w pubmed: 32461765 pmcid: 7243233
Fang H, Li C, Zhao J, Zhao C (2021) Biotechnological advances and trends in engineering Trichoderma reesei towards cellulase hyperproducer. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 26:517–528
doi: 10.1007/s12257-020-0243-y
Chen M, Zhao J, Xia L (2009) Comparison of four different chemical pretreatments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility. Biomass Bioenerg 33:1381–1385
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.025
Zhao C, Xie B, Zhao R, Fang H (2019) Microbial oil production by Mortierella isabellina from sodium hydroxide pretreated rice straw degraded by three-stage enzymatic hydrolysis in the context of on-site cellulase production. Renew Energy 130:281–289
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.080
Zhao C, Zou Z, Li J, Jia H, Liesche J, Chen S, Fang H (2018) Efficient bioethanol production from sodium hydroxide pretreated corn stover and rice straw in the context of on-site cellulase production. Renew Energy 118:14–24
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.001
Sganzerla WG, Lachos-Perez D, Buller LS, Zabot GL, Forster-Carneiro T (2021) Cost analysis of subcritical water pretreatment of sugarcane straw and bagasse for second-generation bioethanol production: a case study in a sugarcane mill. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 16:435–450
doi: 10.1002/bbb.2332
Chen J, Wang X, Zhang B, Yang Y, Song Y, Zhang F, Liu B, Zhou Y, Yi Y, Shan Y, Lu X (2021) Integrating enzymatic hydrolysis into subcritical water pretreatment optimization for bioethanol production from wheat straw. Sci Total Environ 770:145321
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145321 pubmed: 33515886
Zhao Y, Zuo F, Shu Q, Yang X, Deng Y (2023) Efficient production of glucaric acid by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 89:e0053523
doi: 10.1128/aem.00535-23 pubmed: 37212714
Tang C-C, Han L-P, Xie G-H (2020) Response of switchgrass grown for forage and bioethanol to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on semiarid marginal land. Agronomy 10.
An Y, Gao Y, Ma Y (2018) Growth performance and weed control effect in response to nitrogen supply for switchgrass after establishment in the semiarid environment. Field Crop Res 221:175–181
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.032
Zhao C, Hou X, Guo Q, Yue Y, Wu J, Cao Y, Wang Q, Li C, Wang Z, Fan X (2022) Switchgrass establishment can ameliorate soil properties of the abandoned cropland in northern China. Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081138
doi: 10.3390/agriculture12081138
Ahamed A, Vermette P (2010) Effect of mechanical agitation on the production of cellulases by Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 49:379–387
doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2010.01.014
Bannari R, Bannari A, Vermette P, Proulx P (2012) A model for cellulase production from Trichoderma reesei in an airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:2025–2038
doi: 10.1002/bit.24473 pubmed: 22389072
Smith TN, Hash K, Davey CL, Mills H, Williams H, Kiely DE (2012) Modifications in the nitric acid oxidation of D-glucose. Carbohyd Res 350:6–13
doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.12.024

Auteurs

Hao Fang (H)

Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China. fangh@zju.edu.cn.
ZJU-Hangzhou Global Scientific and Technological Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 311215, Zhejiang, China. fangh@zju.edu.cn.

Yuchen Li (Y)

Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Yuqi Song (Y)

Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, 14 Alliance Lane, Clayton Victoria 3800, Clayton, Australia.

Liang Yu (L)

Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.

Xiangyang Song (X)

College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, No.159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210037, Jiangsu, China.
Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics & Biotechnology of Chinese Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, No.159 Longpan Road, Nanjing, 210037, Jiangsu, China.

Chen Zhao (C)

College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling District, Xianyang, 712100, Shaanxi, China. zhaochencn@hotmail.com.
Biomass Energy Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Lands, Northwest A&F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Xianyang, 712100, Shaanxi, China. zhaochencn@hotmail.com.

Classifications MeSH