Associations of overweight status with spinal curve correction and complications in patients undergoing vertebral body tethering: a multicenter retrospective review.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Body mass index
Curve correction
Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis
Vertebral body tethering
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
22
01
2024
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
19
8
2024
pubmed:
19
8
2024
entrez:
19
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Our purpose was to determine associations between body mass index (BMI) category and outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT), a non-fusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS). Using a multicenter database, we identified patients with AIS or JIS who underwent VBT from 2012 to 2018 and had minimum 2-year follow-up (median, 3.0 [interquartile range 2.2, 3.8]). BMI percentiles were used to classify patients as overweight (≥ 85th percentile) or non-overweight (< 85th percentile). Univariate and multivariate regressions assessed associations between complication rates and curve correction between groups, controlling for sex, triradiate cartilage closure, and preoperative curve magnitude. Of 271 patients, 48 (18%) were overweight. Complication rates did not differ between groups. Factors associated with less correction from preoperative to first postoperative-erect imaging were overweight (β = - 10, p < 0.001), male sex (β = - 8.8 p < 0.01), closed triradiate cartilage (β = 6.0, p = 0.01), and smaller preoperative curve (β = 0.3, p < 0.01). Factors associated with a larger curve at latest follow-up were overweight (β = 4.0, p = 0.02) and larger preoperative curve (β = 0.5, p < 0.001), but tether breakage did not differ between groups (p = 0.31). In patients who were overweight, VBT was associated with less curve correction at first erect imaging and larger final curve. However, complications and curve correction during the modulation phase were not different from those of non-overweight patients. These findings suggest that surgeons should expect less correction with VBT in patients who are overweight but similar correction over time. Prognostic, Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39158820
doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00942-8
pii: 10.1007/s43390-024-00942-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
Références
El-Hawary R, Chukwunyerenwa C (2014) Update on evaluation and treatment of scoliosis. Pediatr Clin N Am 61:1223–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007
doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.08.007
Parent S, Shen J (2020) Anterior vertebral body growth-modulation tethering in idiopathic scoliosis: surgical technique. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28:693–699. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00849
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00849
pubmed: 32618681
Bizzoca D, Piazzolla A, Moretti L, Vicenti G, Moretti B, Solarino G (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis in growing children: a systematic review. World J Orthop 13:481–493. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.481
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i5.481
pubmed: 35633741
pmcid: 9125003
Zhang H, Fan Y, Ni S, Pi G (2022) The preliminary outcomes of vertebral body tethering in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine Deform 10:1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00546-0
doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00546-0
pubmed: 35841473
Zhu F, Qiu X, Liu S, Man-Chee Cheung K (2022) Minimum 3-year experience with vertebral body tethering for treating scoliosis: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 30:10225536221137752. https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221137753
doi: 10.1177/10225536221137753
pubmed: 36420934
Hershkovich O, Friedlander A, Gordon B, Arzi H, Derazne E, Tzur D, Shamiss A, Afek A (2014) Association between body mass index, body height, and the prevalence of spinal deformities. Spine J 14:1581–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.034
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.034
pubmed: 24332597
Hardesty CK, Poe-Kochert C, Son-Hing JP, Thompson GH (2013) Obesity negatively affects spinal surgery in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2696-6
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2696-6
pubmed: 23192788
Chan CYW, Mohamad SM, Tan SH, Loh LH, Lim JN, Chiu CK, Hasan MS, Kwan MK (2019) Do overweight adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients have an increased perioperative risk for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery?: A propensity score matching analysis of 374 AIS patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:389–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002853
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002853
pubmed: 30153211
Bjerke BT, Saiyed R, Cheung ZB, Uppstrom TJ, Shifflett GD, Cunningham ME (2017) Does adolescent obesity affect surgical presentation and radiographic outcome for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? J Pediatr Orthop B 26:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000351
doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000351
pubmed: 27336711
Sun W, Zhou J, Sun M, Qin X, Qiu Y, Zhu Z, Xu L (2017) Low body mass index can be predictive of bracing failure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 26:1665–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4839-z
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4839-z
pubmed: 27807774
O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, Farmer KW, Sponseller PD (2005) Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1069–1074. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.C.01707
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01707
Goodbody CM, Asztalos IB, Sankar WN, Flynn JM (2016) It’s not just the big kids: both high and low BMI impact bracing success for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 10:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0763-3
doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0763-3
pubmed: 27501808
pmcid: 5033782
Mishreky A, Parent S, Miyanji F, Smit K, Murphy J, Bowker R, Al Khatib N, El-Hawary R, Pediatric Spine Study Group (2022) Body mass index affects outcomes after vertebral body tethering surgery. Spine Deform 10:563–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00455-8
doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00455-8
pubmed: 35013996
Pereira-Duarte M, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Joncas J, Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Barchi S, Parent S (2023) Pre-operative parameters influencing vertebral body tethering outcomes: patient’s characteristics play an important role in determining the outcomes at a minimum of 2 years post-op. Spine Deform 11:1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00739-1
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00739-1
pubmed: 37528248
Li Y, Binkowski L, Grzywna A, Robbins CB, Caird MS, Farley FA, Glotzbecker M (2017) Is obesity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with larger curves and worse surgical outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E156–E162. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001721
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001721
pubmed: 27254656
Keil LG, Himmelberg SM, Guissé NF, Nash AB, Fletcher ND, Stone JD (2022) Complications following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective cohort study using the modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink system. Spine Deform 10:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00468-3
doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00468-3
pubmed: 35112274
Guo W, Li B-L, Zhao J-Y, Li X-M, Wang L-F (2024) Causal associations between modifiable risk factors and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine J 24:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.021
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.021
pubmed: 37939919
Cannata F, Vadalà G, Ambrosio L, Fallucca S, Napoli N, Papalia R, Pozzilli P, Denaro V (2020) Intervertebral disc degeneration: a focus on obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 36:e3224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3224
doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3224
pubmed: 31646738
Roser MJ, Askin GN, Labrom RD, Zahir SF, Izatt M, Little JP (2023) Vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deform 11:1297–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00723-9
pubmed: 37432604
pmcid: 10587225
Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07009-6
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07009-6
pubmed: 34591175
von Treuheim TDP, Eaker L, Markowitz J, Shankar D, Meyers J, Lonner B (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering for scoliosis patients with and without skeletal growth remaining: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 17:6–16. https://doi.org/10.14444/8357
doi: 10.14444/8357
pubmed: 36113952
Trobisch P, Mahoney JM, Eichenlaub EK, Antonacci CL, Cuddihy L, Amin DB, Razo-Castaneda D, Orbach MR, McGuckin JP, Bucklen BS, Antonacci MD, Betz RR (2023) An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction. Eur Spine J 32:1173–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5
pubmed: 36871254