Construct validity of PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, and physical function as patient-reported outcomes in adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An international study from the OMERACT myositis working group.

Myositis OMERACT Outcome measurement Patient-reported outcome Quality of life Measure

Journal

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism
ISSN: 1532-866X
Titre abrégé: Semin Arthritis Rheum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306053

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 04 04 2024
revised: 10 07 2024
accepted: 11 07 2024
medline: 20 8 2024
pubmed: 20 8 2024
entrez: 19 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Validated patient-reported outcome measures to assess disease impact in patients with adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are needed. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, and Physical Function measures in comparison with core disease activity measures. Adults with IIM, excluding inclusion body myositis, from OMERACT Myositis Working Group (MWG) clinic sites completed PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0-Physical Function 8b measures. Core disease activity measures including patient and physician global disease activity assessments, manual muscle testing, serum creatine kinase activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were simultaneously assessed. To evaluate construct validity, a priori hypotheses for the expected correlations between PROMIS measures, age, and core disease measures were determined by >70 % agreement among MWG members and were compared against observed Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency of items and floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS measures were also assessed. Subgroup analysis according to IIM subtype (dermatomyositis vs. non-dermatomyositis IIM) was performed. 135 adults with IIM from 5 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia were included. For construct validity, a priori hypotheses were confirmed for 5 of 6 (83 %) PROMIS Pain Interference, 4 of 5 (80 %) PROMIS Fatigue, and 3 of 4 (75 %) PROMIS Physical Function correlations. Internal consistency was high for each PROMIS measure (Cronbach's alpha >0.9). Ceiling effects were observed only for PROMIS Pain Interference, with low/no pain in 29 % of patients. Subgroup analysis between dermatomyositis (n = 65) and non-dermatomyositis (n = 70) subtypes demonstrated similar correlations between PROMIS measures and disease activity measures. PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0-Physical Function 8b measures demonstrate strong construct validity when compared to core disease activity measures in IIM, with consistent results across IIM subtypes. These findings support the use of these selected PROMIS measures to assess core domains of interest for measuring life impact in IIMs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Validated patient-reported outcome measures to assess disease impact in patients with adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are needed. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of PROMIS Pain Interference, Fatigue, and Physical Function measures in comparison with core disease activity measures.
METHODS METHODS
Adults with IIM, excluding inclusion body myositis, from OMERACT Myositis Working Group (MWG) clinic sites completed PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0-Physical Function 8b measures. Core disease activity measures including patient and physician global disease activity assessments, manual muscle testing, serum creatine kinase activity, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were simultaneously assessed. To evaluate construct validity, a priori hypotheses for the expected correlations between PROMIS measures, age, and core disease measures were determined by >70 % agreement among MWG members and were compared against observed Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency of items and floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS measures were also assessed. Subgroup analysis according to IIM subtype (dermatomyositis vs. non-dermatomyositis IIM) was performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
135 adults with IIM from 5 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia were included. For construct validity, a priori hypotheses were confirmed for 5 of 6 (83 %) PROMIS Pain Interference, 4 of 5 (80 %) PROMIS Fatigue, and 3 of 4 (75 %) PROMIS Physical Function correlations. Internal consistency was high for each PROMIS measure (Cronbach's alpha >0.9). Ceiling effects were observed only for PROMIS Pain Interference, with low/no pain in 29 % of patients. Subgroup analysis between dermatomyositis (n = 65) and non-dermatomyositis (n = 70) subtypes demonstrated similar correlations between PROMIS measures and disease activity measures.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Pain Interference 6a, PROMIS Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a, and PROMIS Short Form v2.0-Physical Function 8b measures demonstrate strong construct validity when compared to core disease activity measures in IIM, with consistent results across IIM subtypes. These findings support the use of these selected PROMIS measures to assess core domains of interest for measuring life impact in IIMs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39159576
pii: S0049-0172(24)00174-4
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152534
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

152534

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Merrilee Needham has received honorarium for educational talks and advisory boards from CSL, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva. Ellen Romich received support from NIH Rheumatology Research Training Grant T32-AR076951 which was paid to the institution. Christopher A. Mecoli received support from K23AR075898 Grant.

Auteurs

Ellen Romich (E)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: ellen.romich@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Didem Saygin (D)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, USA.

Dana DiRenzo (D)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Christopher A Mecoli (CA)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, USA.

Ingrid de Groot (I)

Patient Research Partner, the Netherlands.

Karin Lodin (K)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Malin Regardt (M)

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet and Medical Unit Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Catherine Sarver (C)

Patient Research Partner, USA.

Ju Yeon Kim (JY)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Jin Kyun Park (JK)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Kelly Beer (K)

Department of Neurology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, IIID Murdoch University and University of Notre Dame, Perth, Australia.

Merrilee Needham (M)

Department of Neurology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, IIID Murdoch University and University of Notre Dame, Perth, Australia.

Helene Alexanderson (H)

Medical Unit Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Lisa Christopher-Stine (L)

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, USA.

Marianne de Visser (M)

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Joost Raaphorst (J)

Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH