Honey bees for pesticide monitoring in the landscape: which bee matrices should be used?

bee matrix honey bees oil seed rape pesticide residues pollution

Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 27 05 2024
revised: 31 07 2024
accepted: 17 08 2024
medline: 20 8 2024
pubmed: 20 8 2024
entrez: 19 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Among bee species, the western honey bee (Apis mellifera) is preferred in monitoring studies performed in the agricultural landscape, while bee matrices, pollen, and honey are mostly a subject of these studies due to their unique composition. A justified question about the relevance of other bee matrices, like larvae, foragers, beebread, and/or wax, has been raised. The ability of different bee matrices (wax, pollen grains, bee bread, foragers, larvae, nectar, and honey) to absorb pesticide residues is subjected in this study. All samples were collected during a crop flowering season (oilseed rape) on intensively managed agricultural land in Slovakia and Germany. The observed high variability in residue levels, profile, and number of detections among studied matrices from Germany, west, and east Slovakia gave us an assumption of the use of different agricultural practices between these two countries. Fungicides clearly dominated across all samples in all sampling regions. The increased pesticide profile positively correlated with the oilseed rape pollen grains in pollen pellets and/or bee bread. Bee wax, pollen, and bee bread showed a high number of detected active substances and total residue concentrations among matrices, indicating their high ability to absorb pesticide residues in the surrounding hive environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39159766
pii: S0045-6535(24)02027-7
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143130
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

143130

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐ The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:

Auteurs

Rastislav Sabo (R)

University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia. Electronic address: rastislav.sabo@uvlf.sk.

Martin Staroň (M)

NPPC - Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Institute of Apiculture Liptovský Hrádok, Dr. J. Gašperíka 599, 033 01 Liptovský Hrádok, Slovak Republic.

Lucia Sabová (L)

University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia.

Tomáš Majchrák (T)

University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia.

Gabriela Bischoff (G)

Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Bee Protection, Königin-Luise-Straße 19, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Jens Pistorius (J)

Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.

Martina Janke (M)

Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES), Institute for Apiculture, Herzogin-Eleonore-Allee 5, 29221 Celle, Germany.

Abdulrahim T Alkassab (AT)

Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Institute for Bee Protection, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH