Utilization and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1,740 patient cases in Germany.
Diagnosis
Family medicine
Infectious illness
Journal
BJGP open
ISSN: 2398-3795
Titre abrégé: BJGP Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101713531
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
21
05
2024
accepted:
27
06
2024
medline:
20
8
2024
pubmed:
20
8
2024
entrez:
19
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for C-reactive protein can support clinical decision-making of general practitioners (GPs) but are not widely used in German general practices. To investigate the utilization of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care. Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (Nov/2022 to Apr/2023). GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use using standardized data collection sheets. Data from 1,740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs, 70.9% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs, 10.3%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5 % of the cases (32.3% in favour When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTI. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision-making and increases the GPs' clinical confidence.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Point-of-care tests (POCTs) for C-reactive protein can support clinical decision-making of general practitioners (GPs) but are not widely used in German general practices.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the utilization of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care.
DESIGN & SETTING
METHODS
Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (Nov/2022 to Apr/2023).
METHOD
METHODS
GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use using standardized data collection sheets.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data from 1,740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs, 70.9% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs, 10.3%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5 % of the cases (32.3% in favour
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTI. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision-making and increases the GPs' clinical confidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39159989
pii: BJGPO.2024.0120
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0120
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024, The Authors.