Acceptance & Commitment Therapy for Adults Living With Inflammatory Bowel Disease & Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

The American journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 1572-0241
Titre abrégé: Am J Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0421030

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 22 03 2024
accepted: 11 07 2024
medline: 20 8 2024
pubmed: 20 8 2024
entrez: 20 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions such as Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) on biopsychosocial outcomes. We aimed to examine the efficacy of an ACT Program (intervention) in comparison to a CBT-Informed Psychoeducation Program (active control) for individuals with IBD and co-existent psychological distress. Both programs were delivered online via a hybrid format (i.e. therapist led and participant-led sessions). 120 adults with IBD were randomized to either the intervention (N=61) or active control groups (N=59). Efficacy was determined using Linear Mixed Models for group differences, in rate of changes in study outcomes, between baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome HRQoL significantly improved in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to post intervention (t [190] = 2.15, p = 0.033) in favor of the intervention group with a medium effect size (β = 0.41, MD = 0.07, 95%CI [0.01, 0.12], p = 0.014). Similarly, the secondary outcome Crohn's disease activity significantly reduced in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to 3-month follow-up (t [90] = -2.40, p = 0.018) in favor of the intervention group with a large effect size (β = -0.77, MD = -9.43, 95%CI [-13.72, -5.13], p < 0.001) p = 0.014). Further, when observing the rate of change in outcomes over time for the groups separately, anxiety symptoms and pain significantly improved in the intervention group only, and conversely, ulcerative colitis activity and stress symptoms significantly improved in the active control group only. All other outcomes (N=14) significantly improved over time in both groups including IBD activity, gastrointestinal unhelpful thinking patterns, visceral anxiety, fatigue interference, fatigue severity, fatigue frequency, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, resilience, current health status, depression symptoms, IBD control, and pain catastrophizing, however these changes were not significantly different between the groups. Both programs were of benefit to people with IBD and distress. However, ACT offers a significant added benefit for HRQoL and self-reported Crohn's disease activity and may be a useful adjuvant therapy in integrated IBD care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions such as Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) on biopsychosocial outcomes. We aimed to examine the efficacy of an ACT Program (intervention) in comparison to a CBT-Informed Psychoeducation Program (active control) for individuals with IBD and co-existent psychological distress. Both programs were delivered online via a hybrid format (i.e. therapist led and participant-led sessions).
METHODS METHODS
120 adults with IBD were randomized to either the intervention (N=61) or active control groups (N=59). Efficacy was determined using Linear Mixed Models for group differences, in rate of changes in study outcomes, between baseline, post intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
The primary outcome HRQoL significantly improved in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to post intervention (t [190] = 2.15, p = 0.033) in favor of the intervention group with a medium effect size (β = 0.41, MD = 0.07, 95%CI [0.01, 0.12], p = 0.014). Similarly, the secondary outcome Crohn's disease activity significantly reduced in the intervention group when compared with the active control group, with a significantly different rate of change observed from baseline to 3-month follow-up (t [90] = -2.40, p = 0.018) in favor of the intervention group with a large effect size (β = -0.77, MD = -9.43, 95%CI [-13.72, -5.13], p < 0.001) p = 0.014). Further, when observing the rate of change in outcomes over time for the groups separately, anxiety symptoms and pain significantly improved in the intervention group only, and conversely, ulcerative colitis activity and stress symptoms significantly improved in the active control group only. All other outcomes (N=14) significantly improved over time in both groups including IBD activity, gastrointestinal unhelpful thinking patterns, visceral anxiety, fatigue interference, fatigue severity, fatigue frequency, psychological inflexibility, self-efficacy, resilience, current health status, depression symptoms, IBD control, and pain catastrophizing, however these changes were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Both programs were of benefit to people with IBD and distress. However, ACT offers a significant added benefit for HRQoL and self-reported Crohn's disease activity and may be a useful adjuvant therapy in integrated IBD care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39162706
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003032
pii: 00000434-990000000-01304
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
ID : #828660

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.

Auteurs

Colette Naude (C)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

David Skvarc (D)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Bernadette Maunick (B)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Subhadra Evans (S)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Daniel Romano (D)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Susan Chesterman (S)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Lahiru Russell (L)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Madeleine Dober (M)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz (M)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Richard Gearry (R)

Department of Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Peter R Gibson (PR)

Department of Gastroenterology, Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Simon Knowles (S)

School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.

Andrew McCombie (A)

Te Whatu Ora Ōtautahi (Health New Zealand Christchurch), Department of General Surgery.

Eric O (E)

Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

Leanne Raven (L)

Crohn's and Colitis Australia, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.

Leesa Van Niekerk (L)

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Antonina Mikocka-Walus (A)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood/Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH