Ischemic core detection threshold of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in acute stroke.

Computed tomography perfusion Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging Ischemic core Ischemic stroke Threshold

Journal

La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 11 03 2024
accepted: 01 08 2024
medline: 20 8 2024
pubmed: 20 8 2024
entrez: 20 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study aimed to determine the accuracy of detecting ischemic core volume using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) in patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke compared to diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as the reference standard. This retrospective monocentric study included patients who underwent CTP and DW-MRI for suspected acute ischemic stroke. The ischemic core size was measured at DW-MRI. The detectability threshold volume was defined as the lowest volume detected by each method. Clinical data on revascularization therapy, along with the clinical decision that influenced the choice, were collected. Volumes of the ischemic cores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Of 83 patients who underwent CTP, 52 patients (median age 73 years, IQR 63-80, 36 men) also had DW-MRI and were included, with a total of 70 ischemic cores. Regarding ischemic cores, only 18/70 (26%) were detected by both CTP and DW-MRI, while 52/70 (74%) were detected only by DW-MRI. The median volume of the 52 ischemic cores undetected on CTP (0.6 mL, IQR 0.2-1.3 mL) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the 18 ischemic cores detected on CTP (14.2 mL, IQR 7.0-18.4 mL). The smallest ischemic core detected on CTP had a volume of 5.0 mL. Among the 20 patients with undetected ischemic core on CTP, only 10% (2/20) received thrombolysis treatment. CTP maps failed in detecting ischemic cores smaller than 5 mL. DW-MRI remains essential for suspected small ischemic brain lesions to guide a correct treatment decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39162940
doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01868-x
pii: 10.1007/s11547-024-01868-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.

Références

Hoving JW, Marquering HA, Majoie CBLM et al (2018) Volumetric and spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion estimated ischemic core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 49:2368–2375. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020846
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020846 pubmed: 30355095
Scheldeman L, Wouters A, Lemmens R (2022) Imaging selection for reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke beyond the conventional time window. J Neurol 269:1715–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10872-4
doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10872-4 pubmed: 34718883
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T et al (2019) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke—a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pubmed: 31662037
Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U et al (2019) European stroke organisation (ESO)—European society for minimally invasive neurological therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by stroke alliance for Europe (SAFE). Eur Stroke J 4:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987319832140
doi: 10.1177/2396987319832140 pubmed: 31165090 pmcid: 6533858
Koopman MS, Hoving JW, Tolhuisen ML et al (2023) accuracy of four different CT perfusion thresholds for ischemic core volume and location estimation using IntelliSpace portal. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 10:239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10060239
doi: 10.3390/jcdd10060239 pubmed: 37367404 pmcid: 10299344
Huo X, Ma G, Tong X et al (2023) Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med 388:1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2213379
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213379 pubmed: 36762852
Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Abraham MG et al (2023) Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 388:1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214403
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 pubmed: 36762865
Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H et al (2022) Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Region. N Engl J Med 386:1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2118191
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118191 pubmed: 35138767
Gregory W, Albers Michael P, Marks S et al (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging New England. J Med 378(8):708–718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1713973
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973
Xu J, Dai F, Wang B et al (2023) Predictive value of CT perfusion in hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010156
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13010156 pubmed: 38137113 pmcid: 10742293
Liberman AL, Prabhakaran S (2017) Stroke chameleons and stroke mimics in the emergency department. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0727-0
doi: 10.1007/s11910-017-0727-0 pubmed: 28229398
Campbell BCV, Christensen S, Levi CR et al (2011) Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 42:3435–3440. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355 pubmed: 21980202
Chen C, Parsons MW, Levi CR et al (2021) What is the “optimal” target mismatch criteria for acute ischemic stroke? Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.590766
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.590766 pubmed: 35250789 pmcid: 8749949
Chung KJ, Khaw AV, Lee DH et al (2022) Low-dose CT perfusion with sparse-view filtered back projection in acute ischemic stroke. Acad Radiol 29:1502–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.01.018
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.01.018 pubmed: 35300907
Lin K, Do KG, Ong P et al (2009) Perfusion CT improves diagnostic accuracy for hyperacute ischemic stroke in the 3-h window: study of 100 patients with diffusion MRI confirmation. Cerebrovasc Dis 28:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1159/000219300
doi: 10.1159/000219300 pubmed: 19468218
Nowinski WL, Gupta V, Qian G et al (2013) Automatic detection, localization, and volume estimation of ischemic infarcts in noncontrast computed tomographic scans. Invest Radiol 48:661–670. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828d8403
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828d8403 pubmed: 23666092
Lim NE, Chia B, Bulsara MK et al (2023) Automated CT perfusion detection of the acute infarct core in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 52:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1159/000524916
doi: 10.1159/000524916 pubmed: 35661075
Krishnaswamy D, Cannane S, Nedunchelian M et al (2022) Predicting imaging outcomes in acute stroke therapy—comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. J Clin Intervent Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736085
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736085
Bang OY, Lee PH, Heo KG et al (2005) Specific DWI lesion patterns predict prognosis after acute ischaemic stroke within the MCA territory. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.059998
Bang OY, Li W (2019) Applications of diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Precis Future Med. https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2019.00037
Thijs VN, Lansberg MG, Beaulieu C et al (2000) Is early ischemic lesion volume on diffusion-weighted imaging an independent predictor of stroke outcome? Stroke 31(11):2597–2602. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.11.2597
Parsons MW (2021) Automated measurement of computed tomography acute ischemic core in stroke. Stroke 52:642–644. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032998
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032998 pubmed: 33430637
Vagal A, Wintermark M, Nael K et al (2019) Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 93:888–898. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481 pubmed: 31636160
Copen WA, Yoo AJ, Rost NS et al (2017) In patients with suspected acute stroke, CT perfusion-based cerebral blood flow maps cannot substitute for DWI in measuring the ischemic core. PLoS ONE 12:e0188891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188891
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188891 pubmed: 29190675 pmcid: 5708772
Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Cuisenaire O et al (2002) Comparison of admission perfusion computed tomography and qualitative diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke patients. Stroke 33:2025–2031. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000023579.61630.AC
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000023579.61630.AC pubmed: 12154257
Han M, Choi JW, Rim N-J et al (2016) Cerebral infarct volume measurements to improve patient selection for endovascular treatment. Medicine 95:e4702. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004702
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004702 pubmed: 27583902 pmcid: 5008586
Axel L (1980) Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. Radiology 137:679–686. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648
doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648 pubmed: 7003648
Albers GW, Lansberg MG, Kemp S et al (2017) A multicenter randomized controlled trial of endovascular therapy following imaging evaluation for ischemic stroke (DEFUSE 3). Int J Stroke 12:896–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017701147
doi: 10.1177/1747493017701147 pubmed: 28946832 pmcid: 5916787
Muehlen I, Sprügel M, Hoelter P et al (2022) Comparison of two automated computed tomography perfusion applications to predict the final infarct volume after thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 3 recanalization. Stroke 53:1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035626
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035626 pubmed: 34872342
Koopman MS, Berkhemer OA, Geuskens RREG et al (2019) Comparison of three commonly used CT perfusion software packages in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 11:1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014822
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014822 pubmed: 31203208
Rava RA, Snyder KV, Mokin M et al (2020) Assessment of a bayesian vitrea ct perfusion analysis to predict final infarct and penumbra volumes in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a comparison with RAPID. Am J Neuroradiol 41(2):206–212. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6395
Bouslama M, Ravindran K, Harston G et al (2021) Noncontrast computed tomography e-stroke infarct volume is similar to RAPID computed tomography perfusion in estimating postreperfusion infarct volumes. Stroke 52(2):634–641. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031651
Liu QC et al (2021) Agreement and accuracy of ischemic core volume evaluated by three ct perfusion software packages in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 30(8):105872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105872
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105872 pubmed: 34153591
Karhi S, Tähtinen O, Aherto J et al (2021) Effect of different thresholds for CT perfusion volumetric analysis on estimated ischemic core and penumbral volumes. PLoS ONE 16:e0249772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249772
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249772 pubmed: 33882098 pmcid: 8059822
Zhang X-H, Liang H-M (2019) Systematic review with network meta-analysis: Diagnostic values of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic stroke. Medicine 98(30):e16360. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016360
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016360 pubmed: 31348236 pmcid: 6709059
Campbell BCV, Christensen S, Levi CR et al (2012) Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 43(10):2648–2653. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660548
Sheth KN, Mazurek MH, Yuen MM et al (2021) Assessment of brain injury using portable, low-field magnetic resonance imaging at the bedside of critically ill patients. JAMA Neurol 78:41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3263
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3263
Wolman DN, Patel BP, Wintermark M et al (2018) Dual-energy computed tomography applications in neurointervention. J Comput Assist Tomogr 42:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000779
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000779 pubmed: 30052616
Larrue V, von Kummer R, Müller A et al (2001) Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 32:438–441. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.2.438
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.2.438 pubmed: 11157179
Ståhl F, Gontu V, Almqvist H et al (2021) Performance of dual layer dual energy CT virtual monoenergetic images to identify early ischemic changes in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. J Neuroradiol 48:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2020.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2020.12.002 pubmed: 33340643
van Ommen F, Dankbaar JW, Zhu G et al (2021) Virtual monochromatic dual-energy CT reconstructions improve detection of cerebral infarct in patients with suspicion of stroke. Neuroradiology 63:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02492-y
doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02492-y pubmed: 32728777
Wolman DN, van Ommen F, Tong E et al (2021) Non-contrast dual-energy CT virtual ischemia maps accurately estimate ischemic core size in large-vessel occlusive stroke. Sci Rep 11:6745. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85143-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85143-3 pubmed: 33762589 pmcid: 7991428
Noguchi K, Itoh T, Naruto N et al (2017) A novel imaging technique (X-Map) to identify acute ischemic lesions using noncontrast dual-energy computed tomography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 26:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.025
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.025 pubmed: 27639587
Taguchi K, Itoh T, Fuld MK et al (2018) “X-Map 2.0” for edema signal enhancement for acute ischemic stroke using non–contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography. Invest Radiol 53:432–439. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000461
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000461 pubmed: 29543692
Ding Y-H, Abbasi M, Michalak G et al (2021) Characterization of thrombus composition with multimodality CT-based imaging: an in-vitro study. J Neurointerv Surg 13:738–740. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016799
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016799 pubmed: 33115814

Auteurs

Luigi Asmundo (L)

Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.

Moreno Zanardo (M)

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy. moreno.zanardo@grupposandonato.it.

Massimo Cressoni (M)

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Federico Ambrogi (F)

Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Della Commenda 19, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Luciano Bet (L)

Neurology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Fabio Giatsidis (F)

Neurology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Giovanni Di Leo (G)

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Francesco Sardanelli (F)

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Paolo Vitali (P)

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH