[Continuous SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in day care centers: A qualitative interview study on the experiences of childcare workers and parents with different self-sampling methods in the home environment].

Kontinuierliche Überwachung von SARS-CoV-2 Infektionen in Kindertagesstätten: eine qualitative Interviewstudie über die Erfahrungen von Betreuer*innen und Eltern mit verschiedenen Testverfahren im häuslichen Umfeld.
COVID-19 testing COVID-19-Testungen Day care centres Interviews Kindertagesstätten Public health surveillance Qualitative Forschung Qualitative research Öffentliche Gesundheitsüberwachung

Journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
ISSN: 2212-0289
Titre abrégé: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101477604

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 12 04 2023
revised: 26 03 2024
accepted: 03 07 2024
medline: 21 8 2024
pubmed: 21 8 2024
entrez: 20 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Since the beginning of the corona pandemic in Germany in January 2020, day care centres (DCC) have faced the challenge of reliably detecting cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection as early and reliably as possible in order to avoid major outbreaks and closures. Conducting regular virological screening tests for asymptomatic DCC children and childcare workers requires a high level of acceptance among participants and should be as easy as possible to implement. The present study aimed to evaluate childcare workers' and parents' attitudes and experiences regarding the acceptance and feasibility of various screening methods. This assessment was conducted using additional qualitative interviews designed for home-based screening in the context of a screening study in DCCs. From May to July 2021, childcare workers and parents of children in nine DCCs in Wuerzburg independently carried out screening tests for SARS-CoV-2 at home twice a week as part of the "Würzburg Child Care Study in the COVID-19 Pandemic 2.0". The participants were offered two self-sampling methods (mouth-rinsing fluid for pooled PCR tests and/or nasal rapid antigen self-tests). Before and after the 12-week test phase, telephone interviews were conducted with a selected sample of childcare workers and parents in order to ascertain initial attitudes and further experiences with the two self-sampling methods and their implementation. The interviews were fully transcribed for analysis and subjected to a qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. Of the 1,026 eligible participants, 591 individuals, including 139 childcare workers and the parents of 452 children, agreed to take part in the screening tests. A total of 49 interviews were conducted with a specifically selected sample (20 before the start of the test, 29 after the end of the test). In the qualitative content analysis, three overarching topics emerged: 'aspects of the test performance', 'aspects of the perception of safety' and 'aspects of the testing in children'. Regardless of the fact that the various test methods and test features were perceived very differently, conducting the tests at home was found to be feasible. The differentiated insights into the participants' perspectives provide valuable information about factors that influence the acceptance of self-testing. These should be taken into account before such a measure is introduced in DCCs if necessary. The assessment of test procedures is strongly influenced by individual preferences. Test concepts should be implemented with as little time and organisational effort as possible in order to promote willingness to participate. Clear study information and quick feedback on test results can enhance the sense of security among parents and childcare workers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Since the beginning of the corona pandemic in Germany in January 2020, day care centres (DCC) have faced the challenge of reliably detecting cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection as early and reliably as possible in order to avoid major outbreaks and closures. Conducting regular virological screening tests for asymptomatic DCC children and childcare workers requires a high level of acceptance among participants and should be as easy as possible to implement. The present study aimed to evaluate childcare workers' and parents' attitudes and experiences regarding the acceptance and feasibility of various screening methods. This assessment was conducted using additional qualitative interviews designed for home-based screening in the context of a screening study in DCCs.
METHOD METHODS
From May to July 2021, childcare workers and parents of children in nine DCCs in Wuerzburg independently carried out screening tests for SARS-CoV-2 at home twice a week as part of the "Würzburg Child Care Study in the COVID-19 Pandemic 2.0". The participants were offered two self-sampling methods (mouth-rinsing fluid for pooled PCR tests and/or nasal rapid antigen self-tests). Before and after the 12-week test phase, telephone interviews were conducted with a selected sample of childcare workers and parents in order to ascertain initial attitudes and further experiences with the two self-sampling methods and their implementation. The interviews were fully transcribed for analysis and subjected to a qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of the 1,026 eligible participants, 591 individuals, including 139 childcare workers and the parents of 452 children, agreed to take part in the screening tests. A total of 49 interviews were conducted with a specifically selected sample (20 before the start of the test, 29 after the end of the test). In the qualitative content analysis, three overarching topics emerged: 'aspects of the test performance', 'aspects of the perception of safety' and 'aspects of the testing in children'. Regardless of the fact that the various test methods and test features were perceived very differently, conducting the tests at home was found to be feasible.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The differentiated insights into the participants' perspectives provide valuable information about factors that influence the acceptance of self-testing. These should be taken into account before such a measure is introduced in DCCs if necessary.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The assessment of test procedures is strongly influenced by individual preferences. Test concepts should be implemented with as little time and organisational effort as possible in order to promote willingness to participate. Clear study information and quick feedback on test results can enhance the sense of security among parents and childcare workers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39164131
pii: S1865-9217(24)00119-3
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.07.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

ger

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Auteurs

Maike Krauthausen (M)

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland. Electronic address: Krauthause_M@ukw.de.

David Gierszewski (D)

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Andrea Streng (A)

Kinderklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Johannes Forster (J)

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Geraldine Engels (G)

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Franziska Pietsch (F)

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Julia Wallstabe (J)

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Thomas Jans (T)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Viktoria Rücker (V)

Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Marcel Romanos (M)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Psychische Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Peter Heuschmann (P)

Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland; Zentrale für klinische Studien, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Lars Dölken (L)

Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Christoph Härtel (C)

Kinderklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Oliver Kurzai (O)

Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland; Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie - Hans-Knöll-Institut, Jena, Deutschland.

Johannes Liese (J)

Kinderklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Ilikdó Gágyor (I)

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Classifications MeSH