Aortic balloon valvuloplasty outcome according to calcium distribution and valve geometry - The ABCD study.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty Calcium Computed tomography Diameter Geometry Outcome

Journal

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 16 05 2024
revised: 02 08 2024
accepted: 14 08 2024
medline: 21 8 2024
pubmed: 21 8 2024
entrez: 20 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is little data on the outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in relation to valve dimensions and calcification patterns. The procedure is not standardized, particularly the choice of balloon size. This retrospective multicenter study focused on BAV efficacy and safety by analyzing the relationship between balloon size, annulus geometry (i.e., diameters, perimeter, and area), and calcification patterns (total burden and calcium distribution over each individual leaflet). From March 2018 to March 2023, all consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated BAV and ECG-gated multidetector computed tomography of the aorta were included, except those with a bicuspid valve. Calcium score was calculated on contrast-enhanced images based on a luminal attenuation threshold of +100 HU. One hundred and fifteen patients were included. Procedural success was 82.6 %. The balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) relative to diameter, perimeter, and area was higher in patients with successful BAV. Patients with unsuccessful BAV had a significantly higher aortic valve calcium burden. The complication rate was 4.3 % and there was no association with valve geometry or calcium burden. A trend towards a reduced complication rate was found as calcium asymmetry increased. BAR minimum annulus diameter was the best parameter in predicting procedural success, with a cut-off at 0.85. BAV efficacy is correlated directly with balloon size in relation to annulus dimension and inversely with total calcium burden. The minimum diameter of the valve may be adopted as a reference for balloon sizing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is little data on the outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in relation to valve dimensions and calcification patterns. The procedure is not standardized, particularly the choice of balloon size.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective multicenter study focused on BAV efficacy and safety by analyzing the relationship between balloon size, annulus geometry (i.e., diameters, perimeter, and area), and calcification patterns (total burden and calcium distribution over each individual leaflet). From March 2018 to March 2023, all consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated BAV and ECG-gated multidetector computed tomography of the aorta were included, except those with a bicuspid valve. Calcium score was calculated on contrast-enhanced images based on a luminal attenuation threshold of +100 HU.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred and fifteen patients were included. Procedural success was 82.6 %. The balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) relative to diameter, perimeter, and area was higher in patients with successful BAV. Patients with unsuccessful BAV had a significantly higher aortic valve calcium burden. The complication rate was 4.3 % and there was no association with valve geometry or calcium burden. A trend towards a reduced complication rate was found as calcium asymmetry increased. BAR minimum annulus diameter was the best parameter in predicting procedural success, with a cut-off at 0.85.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
BAV efficacy is correlated directly with balloon size in relation to annulus dimension and inversely with total calcium burden. The minimum diameter of the valve may be adopted as a reference for balloon sizing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39164142
pii: S1553-8389(24)00627-4
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Gianni Dall'Ara (G)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: gianni.dallara2@unibo.it.

Sara Piciucchi (S)

Department of Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Carolina Moretti (C)

Cardiology Unit, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.

Caterina Cavazza (C)

Cardiology Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.

Miriam Compagnone (M)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Giuseppe Guerrieri (G)

Cardiology Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Simone Grotti (S)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Daniela Spartà (D)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Roberto Carletti (R)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Elisabetta Fabbri (E)

Research and Innovation Program, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.

Emanuela Giampalma (E)

Department of Radiology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Andrea Santarelli (A)

Cardiology Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Filippo Ottani (F)

Cardiology Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.

Marco Balducelli (M)

Cardiology Unit, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.

Francesco Saia (F)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Italy.

Fabio Felice Tarantino (FF)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.

Marcello Galvani (M)

Cardiology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Italy; Cardiovascular Research Unit, Myriam Zito Sacco Heart Foundation, Forlì, Italy.

Classifications MeSH