Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions of child health research at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Child health
Child health research
Healthcare workers
Interpretative phenomenological analysis
Kamuzu Central Hospital
Journal
Human resources for health
ISSN: 1478-4491
Titre abrégé: Hum Resour Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
08
04
2024
accepted:
22
07
2024
medline:
21
8
2024
pubmed:
21
8
2024
entrez:
20
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children's health is a global public health priority and a determinant of development and sustainability. Its effective delivery and further improvements require constant and dedicated research on children, especially by child healthcare workers (HCWs). Studies have shown a high involvement of child HCWs from developed countries in child health research, with an under-representation from the global south in authorship and leadership in international collaborations. To our knowledge, there is very little literature on challenges faced by child HCWs in Malawi in conducting child health research. We sought to explore the lived experiences of child HCWs at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) in Malawi by examining their perceptions of child health research and assessing the availability of child health research opportunities. From July 2023 to August 2023, we conducted five key informant interviews with purposively sampled policymakers and 20 in-depth interviews with child HCWs at KCH. The interviews were conducted in English, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We utilised interpretative phenomenological analysis by reviewing initial transcripts for familiarity, generating codes manually, and refining them into broader themes through comparisons and iterative processes. The analysis revealed three main themes on perceptions of child HCWs at KCH in child health research. These are (i) perceived motivation and challenges for engaging in child health research, (ii) perceptions of resource availability and research opportunities at KCH, and (iii) perceptions of gaps in research training and participation among child HCWs. Our study has uncovered critical factors influencing the low participation of child HCWs in child health research at KCH. Lack of collaboration, limited financial opportunities, and non-research-based training were the key barriers to participation in child health research among child HCWs at KCH. We advocate for the inclusion of child HCWs at all stages of collaborative health research, transparency on funding opportunities for child health research, and inclusion of research in the training of HCWs. These initiatives can strengthen the participation of child HCWs in child health research and ultimately enhance child health outcomes in Malawi.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Children's health is a global public health priority and a determinant of development and sustainability. Its effective delivery and further improvements require constant and dedicated research on children, especially by child healthcare workers (HCWs). Studies have shown a high involvement of child HCWs from developed countries in child health research, with an under-representation from the global south in authorship and leadership in international collaborations. To our knowledge, there is very little literature on challenges faced by child HCWs in Malawi in conducting child health research. We sought to explore the lived experiences of child HCWs at Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) in Malawi by examining their perceptions of child health research and assessing the availability of child health research opportunities.
METHODS
METHODS
From July 2023 to August 2023, we conducted five key informant interviews with purposively sampled policymakers and 20 in-depth interviews with child HCWs at KCH. The interviews were conducted in English, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We utilised interpretative phenomenological analysis by reviewing initial transcripts for familiarity, generating codes manually, and refining them into broader themes through comparisons and iterative processes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The analysis revealed three main themes on perceptions of child HCWs at KCH in child health research. These are (i) perceived motivation and challenges for engaging in child health research, (ii) perceptions of resource availability and research opportunities at KCH, and (iii) perceptions of gaps in research training and participation among child HCWs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study has uncovered critical factors influencing the low participation of child HCWs in child health research at KCH. Lack of collaboration, limited financial opportunities, and non-research-based training were the key barriers to participation in child health research among child HCWs at KCH. We advocate for the inclusion of child HCWs at all stages of collaborative health research, transparency on funding opportunities for child health research, and inclusion of research in the training of HCWs. These initiatives can strengthen the participation of child HCWs in child health research and ultimately enhance child health outcomes in Malawi.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39164721
doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00938-5
pii: 10.1186/s12960-024-00938-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
57Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Hanifiha M, Ghanbari A, Keykhaei M, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Rezaei N, Pasha Zanous M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden and quality of care index in children and adolescents: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 1990–2017. PLoS ONE. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267596 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267596
pubmed: 35472096
pmcid: 9041858
Khan MI, Memon ZA, Bhutta ZA. Challenges and opportunities in conducting research in developing countries. Pediatr Epidemiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1159/000481323 .
doi: 10.1159/000481323
Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385:430–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6
pubmed: 25280870
Requejo JH, Bhutta ZA. The post-2015 agenda: staying the course in maternal and child survival. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(suppl 1):S76–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305737 .
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305737
pubmed: 25613979
The World Health Organisation. Child health research. A foundation for improving child health. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/68359/WHO_FCH_CAH_02.3.pdf;jsessionid=8860E98FB42246C4A3869DD54B713910?sequence=1
Lang T, Siribaddana S. Clinical trials have gone global: is this a good thing? PLoS Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001228 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001228
pubmed: 22719228
pmcid: 3373653
Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Ongolo-Zogo P, Lang T. The challenges and opportunities of conducting a clinical trial in a low-resource setting: the case of the Cameroon mobile phone SMS (CAMPS) trial, an investigator-initiated trial. Trials. 2011;12:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-145 .
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-145
Khodaee GH, Khademi G, Saeidi M. Under-five mortality in the world (1900–2015). Int J Pediatr. 2015;3:1093–5. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2015.6078 .
doi: 10.22038/ijp.2015.6078
Victora CG, Wagstaff A, Schellenberg JA, Gwatkin D, Claeson M, Habicht J. Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough. Lancet. 2003;362:233–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13917-7 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13917-7
pubmed: 12885488
Reiner RC Jr, Olsen HE, Ikeda CT, Echko MM, Ballestreros KE, Manguerra H, et al. Diseases, injuries, and risk factors in child and adolescent health, 1990 to 2017: findings from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors 2017 study. JAMA Pediatr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0337 .
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0337
pubmed: 31034019
pmcid: 6547084
Dabis F, Orne-Gliemann J, Perez F, Leroy V, Newell ML, Coutsoudis A, et al. Working group on women and child health. Improving child health: the role of research. BMJ. 2002;324(7351):1444–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1444 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1444
pubmed: 12065272
pmcid: 1123388
Alemayehu C, Mitchell G, Nikles J. Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries—a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0748-6
pubmed: 29566721
pmcid: 5863824
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global comparative assessments in the health sector: disease burden, expenditures and intervention packages. 1994. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209104/ .
Orne-Gliemann J, Perez F, Leroy V, Newell ML, Dabis F. A decade of child health research in developing countries. Sante. 2003;13:69–75.
pubmed: 14530116
Røttingen JA, Regmi S, Eide M, Young AJ, Viergever RF, Ardal C, et al. Mapping of available health research and development data: what’s there, what’s missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? Lancet. 2013;382(9900):1286–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61046-6 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61046-6
pubmed: 23697824
Moon S, Bermudez J, Hoen E. Innovation and access to medicines for neglected populations: could a treaty address a broken pharmaceutical R&D system? PLoS Med. 2012;9: e1001218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001218 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001218
pubmed: 22615544
pmcid: 3352855
Chu KM, Jayaraman S, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G. Building research capacity in Africa: equity and global health collaborations. PLoS Med. 2014;11(3): e1001612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001612 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001612
pubmed: 24618823
pmcid: 3949667
González-Alcaide G, Menchi-Elanzi M, Nacarapa E, Ramos-Rincón JM. HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships. Glob Health. 2020;16:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00609-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00609-9
Zakumumpa H, Bennett S, Ssengooba F. Leveraging the lessons learned from financing HIV programs to advance the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda in the East African community. Glob Health Res Policy. 2019;4:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0118-y .
doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0118-y
pubmed: 31535036
pmcid: 6743123
Langer A, Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Berdichevsky K, Villar J. Why is research from developing countries underrepresented in international health literature, and what can be done about it? Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:802–3.
pubmed: 15643806
pmcid: 2623037
Smith E, Hunt M, Master Z. Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle-income countries and high-income countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-42 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-42
pubmed: 24885855
pmcid: 4061921
Muula AS, Misiri H, Chimalizeni Y, Mpando D, Phiri C, Nyaka A. Access to continued professional education among health workers in Blantyre, Malawi. Afr Health Sci. 2004;4(3):182–4.
pubmed: 15687071
pmcid: 2688328
WHO Expert Committee. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products and the use of essential drugs. Sixth report of the WHO expert committee. Geneva: WHO Technical Report Series; 1995. https://www.femh-irb.org/content_pages/files_add/doc_arb/I01_9712011000.pdf .
McMichael C, Waters E, Volmink J. Evidence-based public health: what does it offer developing countries? J Public Health. 2005;27:215–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/PubMed/fdi024 .
doi: 10.1093/PubMed/fdi024
Ministry of Health. (2012). National Health Research Agenda 2012–2016. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/Malawi%20National-Health-Research-Agenda.pdf.
Masefield SC, Msosa A, Grugel J. Challenges to effective governance in a low-income healthcare system: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x
pubmed: 33317520
pmcid: 7734892
Government of the Republic of Malawi. Health Sector Strategic Plan II 2017–2022. Towards universal health coverage. Lilongwe: Ministry of Health; 2017. https://www.healthdatacollaborative.org/fileadmin/uploads/hdc/Documents/Country_documents/HSSP_II_Final_HQ_complete_file.pdf.pdf
Sihre HK, Gill P, Lindenmeyer A, McGuiness M, Berrisford G, Jankovic J, et al. Understanding the lived experiences of severe postnatal psychiatric illnesses in English speaking South Asian women, living in the UK: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025928 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025928
pubmed: 31375603
pmcid: 6688680
Smith JA, Fieldsend M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Camic PM, editor. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association; 2021. p. 147–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-008 .
doi: 10.1037/0000252-008
Pietkiewicz I, Smith JA. A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychol J. 2014;20:7–14. https://doi.org/10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7 .
doi: 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
Heidegger M. Introduction to phenomenological research. Indiana University Press. 2005.
Rodriguez A, Smith J. Phenomenology as a healthcare research method. Evid Based Nurs. 2018;21(4):96–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102990 .
doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102990
pubmed: 30201830
Crotty M. Phenomenology and nursing research. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone; 1996.
Tongco MDC. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007;5:147–58.
doi: 10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 .
doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers—Google Books. 2013
Heidegger M. Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd; 1962 (Original work published 1927).
Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J. 2008;204(8):429–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.bdj.2008.292 .
doi: 10.1038/SJ.bdj.2008.292
pubmed: 18438371
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 .
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
pubmed: 17872937
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Brazil: The World Medical Association, Inc. 2013. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ .
Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287 .
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
pubmed: 35389310
Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103 .
doi: 10.1177/160940690600500103
Kengia JT, Kalolo A, Barash D, Chwa C, Hayirli TC, Kapologwe NA, et al. Research capacity, motivators and barriers to conducting research among healthcare providers in Tanzania’s public health system: a mixed methods study. Hum Resour Health. 2023;21(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00858-w .
doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00858-w
pubmed: 37670321
pmcid: 10478476
Franzen SRP, Chandler C, Lang T. Health research capacity development in low and middle-income countries: reality or rhetoric? A systematic meta-narrative review of the qualitative literature. BMJ Open. 2017;7: e012332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012332 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012332
pubmed: 28131997
pmcid: 5278257
Gureje O, Seedat S, Kola L, Appiah-Poku J, Othieno C, Harris B, et al. Partnership for mental health development in sub-Saharan Africa (PaM-D): a collaborative initiative for research and capacity building. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28:389–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000707 .
doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000707
pubmed: 30479242
Sun C, Dlamini PS, Maimbolwa MC, Changala Lukwesa Mukonka C, Nyamakura R, Omoni G, et al. Success stories: overcoming barriers to research in southern and eastern African countries. Clin Nurs Res. 2017;26:399–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773817718935 .
doi: 10.1177/1054773817718935
pubmed: 28707552
Thomson DR, Semakula M, Hirschhorn LR, Murray M, Ndahindwa V, Manzi A, et al. Applied statistical training to strengthen analysis and health research capacity in Rwanda. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0144-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0144-x
pubmed: 27681517
pmcid: 5041513
Bates I, Boyd A, Smith H, Cole DC. A practical and systematic approach to organisational capacity strengthening for research in the health sector in Africa. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-11 .
doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-11
pubmed: 24581148
pmcid: 3975897
Pascal Iloh GU, Amadi AN, Iro OK, Agboola SM, Aguocha GU, Chukwuonye ME. Attitude, practice orientation, benefits and barriers towards health research and publications among medical practitioners in Abia State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23:129–37. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_284_18 .
doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_284_18
pubmed: 32031085
Corchon S, Portillo MC, Watson R, Saracíbar M. Nursing research capacity building in a Spanish hospital: an intervention study. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(17–18):2479–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03744.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03744.x
pubmed: 21726314
Gulland A. Doctors cite lack of time as greatest barrier to research. Br Med J. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1488 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1488
Habineza H, Nsanzabaganwa C, Nyirimanzi N, Umuhoza C, Cartledge K, Conard C, et al. Perceived attitudes of the importance and barriers to research amongst Rwandan interns and pediatric residents—a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1425-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1425-6
pubmed: 30606184
pmcid: 6318911
Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-276 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-276
pubmed: 22920443
pmcid: 3464180
Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S27638 .
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S27638
pubmed: 22396626
pmcid: 3292402