Trends in habitat quality and habitat degradation in terrestrial protected areas.
InVEST
biodiversity conservation
calidad del hábitat
cambio en el uso y cobertura del suelo
conservación de la biodiversidad
degradación del hábitat
habitat degradation
habitat quality
land‐use and land‐cover change
protected area
área protegida
保护地
土地利用和土地覆盖变化
生境质量
生境退化
生物多样性保护
Journal
Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
ISSN: 1523-1739
Titre abrégé: Conserv Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882301
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Aug 2024
21 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised:
21
05
2024
received:
06
12
2023
accepted:
24
05
2024
medline:
21
8
2024
pubmed:
21
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Protected areas are typically considered a cornerstone of conservation programs and play a fundamental role in protecting natural areas and biodiversity. Human-driven land-use and land-cover (LULC) changes lead to habitat loss and biodiversity loss inside protected areas, impairing their effectiveness. However, the global dynamics of habitat quality and habitat degradation in protected areas remain unclear. We used the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model based on global annual remotely sensed data to examine the spatial and temporal trends in habitat quality and degradation in global terrestrial protected areas. Habitat quality represented the ability of habitats to provide suitable conditions for the persistence of individuals and populations, and habitat degradation represented the impacts on habitats from human-driven LULC changes in the surrounding landscape. Based on a linear mixed-effects modeling method, we also explored the relationship between habitat degradation trends and protected area characteristics, biophysical factors, and socioeconomic factors. Habitat quality declined by 0.005 (0.6%) and habitat degradation increased by 0.002 (11%) from 1992 to 2020 globally, and similar trends occurred even in remote or restrictively managed protected areas. Habitat degradation was attributed primarily to nonirrigated cropland (62%) and urbanization (27%) in 2020. Increases in elevation, gross domestic production per capita, and human population density and decreases in agricultural suitability were associated with accelerated habitat degradation. Our results suggest that human-induced LULC changes have expanded from already-exploited areas into relatively undisturbed areas, and that in wealthy countries in particular, degradation is related to rapid urbanization and increasing demand for agricultural products. Tendencias en la calidad y degradación del hábitat en áreas protegidas terrestres Resumen Las áreas protegidas suelen considerarse la piedra angular de los programas de conservación y desempeñan un papel fundamental en la protección de los espacios naturales y la biodiversidad. Los cambios en el uso y la cobertura del suelo (CUCS) provocados por el hombre conducen a la pérdida de hábitats y de biodiversidad dentro de las áreas protegidas, lo que merma su eficacia. Sin embargo, la dinámica global de la calidad y la degradación del hábitat en las áreas protegidas sigue sin estar clara. Utilizamos el modelo de valoración integrada de servicios ambientales y compensaciones (InVEST), basado en datos anuales mundiales obtenidos por teledetección, para examinar las tendencias espaciales y temporales de la calidad y degradación del hábitat en las áreas terrestres protegidas de todo el mundo. La calidad del hábitat representó su capacidad para proporcionar condiciones adecuadas para la persistencia de individuos y poblaciones, y la degradación del hábitat representó los impactos sobre los hábitats de los cambios CUCS provocados por el hombre en el paisaje circundante. Con base en un método de modelo lineal de efectos mixtos, también exploramos la relación entre las tendencias de degradación del hábitat y las características de las áreas protegidas, los factores biofísicos y los factores socioeconómicos. La calidad del hábitat disminuyó en un 0.005 (0,6%) y la degradación del hábitat aumentó en un 0.002 (11%) entre 1992 y 2020 a nivel mundial, y se produjeron tendencias similares incluso en áreas protegidas remotas o gestionadas de forma restrictiva. La degradación del hábitat se atribuyó principalmente a las tierras de cultivo sin irrigación (62%) y a la urbanización (27%) en 2020. El aumento de la altitud, del producto interno bruto per cápita y de la densidad de población humana, así como la disminución de la idoneidad agrícola, se asociaron a una aceleración de la degradación del hábitat. Nuestros resultados sugieren que los cambios en el CUCS inducidos por el hombre se han extendido desde zonas ya explotadas a zonas relativamente inalteradas, y que, en particular en los países ricos, la degradación está relacionada con la rápida urbanización y la creciente demanda de productos agrícolas. 保护地通常被视为保护计划的基石, 在保护自然区域和生物多样性方面发挥着重要作用。人类驱动的土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)变化导致了保护地内的生境丧失和生物多样性丧失, 损害了保护地的有效性。然而, 保护地内生境质量和生境退化的全球动态尚不清楚。基于全球逐年遥感数据, 本研究应用生态系统服务和权衡的综合评估(InVEST)模型, 研究了全球陆地保护地内生境质量和生境退化的时空趋势。具体而言, 生境质量代表生境为个体和种群的持续生存提供适宜条件的能力, 而生境退化则代表周围景观中人类驱动的LULC变化对生境的影响。基于线性混合效应建模方法, 本研究还探讨了生境退化趋势与保护地特征、生物物理因素和社会经济因素之间的关系。从1992年到2020年, 全球生境质量下降了0.005(0.6%), 生境退化增加了0.002(11%), 甚至在偏远或限制性管理的保护地也出现了类似的趋势。在2020年, 生境退化主要归因于非灌溉耕地(62%)和城市化(27%)。海拔高度增加、人均国内生产总值增加、人口密度增加、农业适宜性降低都与生境退化加速有关。本研究表明, 人类引起的LULC变化已经从已开发地区扩张到相对未受到干扰的地区, 而在富裕国家, 生境退化与快速的城市化和持续增长的农产品需求有关。 陆地保护地内的生境质量和生境退化趋势.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(spa)
Tendencias en la calidad y degradación del hábitat en áreas protegidas terrestres Resumen Las áreas protegidas suelen considerarse la piedra angular de los programas de conservación y desempeñan un papel fundamental en la protección de los espacios naturales y la biodiversidad. Los cambios en el uso y la cobertura del suelo (CUCS) provocados por el hombre conducen a la pérdida de hábitats y de biodiversidad dentro de las áreas protegidas, lo que merma su eficacia. Sin embargo, la dinámica global de la calidad y la degradación del hábitat en las áreas protegidas sigue sin estar clara. Utilizamos el modelo de valoración integrada de servicios ambientales y compensaciones (InVEST), basado en datos anuales mundiales obtenidos por teledetección, para examinar las tendencias espaciales y temporales de la calidad y degradación del hábitat en las áreas terrestres protegidas de todo el mundo. La calidad del hábitat representó su capacidad para proporcionar condiciones adecuadas para la persistencia de individuos y poblaciones, y la degradación del hábitat representó los impactos sobre los hábitats de los cambios CUCS provocados por el hombre en el paisaje circundante. Con base en un método de modelo lineal de efectos mixtos, también exploramos la relación entre las tendencias de degradación del hábitat y las características de las áreas protegidas, los factores biofísicos y los factores socioeconómicos. La calidad del hábitat disminuyó en un 0.005 (0,6%) y la degradación del hábitat aumentó en un 0.002 (11%) entre 1992 y 2020 a nivel mundial, y se produjeron tendencias similares incluso en áreas protegidas remotas o gestionadas de forma restrictiva. La degradación del hábitat se atribuyó principalmente a las tierras de cultivo sin irrigación (62%) y a la urbanización (27%) en 2020. El aumento de la altitud, del producto interno bruto per cápita y de la densidad de población humana, así como la disminución de la idoneidad agrícola, se asociaron a una aceleración de la degradación del hábitat. Nuestros resultados sugieren que los cambios en el CUCS inducidos por el hombre se han extendido desde zonas ya explotadas a zonas relativamente inalteradas, y que, en particular en los países ricos, la degradación está relacionada con la rápida urbanización y la creciente demanda de productos agrícolas.
Type: Publisher
(chi)
保护地通常被视为保护计划的基石, 在保护自然区域和生物多样性方面发挥着重要作用。人类驱动的土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)变化导致了保护地内的生境丧失和生物多样性丧失, 损害了保护地的有效性。然而, 保护地内生境质量和生境退化的全球动态尚不清楚。基于全球逐年遥感数据, 本研究应用生态系统服务和权衡的综合评估(InVEST)模型, 研究了全球陆地保护地内生境质量和生境退化的时空趋势。具体而言, 生境质量代表生境为个体和种群的持续生存提供适宜条件的能力, 而生境退化则代表周围景观中人类驱动的LULC变化对生境的影响。基于线性混合效应建模方法, 本研究还探讨了生境退化趋势与保护地特征、生物物理因素和社会经济因素之间的关系。从1992年到2020年, 全球生境质量下降了0.005(0.6%), 生境退化增加了0.002(11%), 甚至在偏远或限制性管理的保护地也出现了类似的趋势。在2020年, 生境退化主要归因于非灌溉耕地(62%)和城市化(27%)。海拔高度增加、人均国内生产总值增加、人口密度增加、农业适宜性降低都与生境退化加速有关。本研究表明, 人类引起的LULC变化已经从已开发地区扩张到相对未受到干扰的地区, 而在富裕国家, 生境退化与快速的城市化和持续增长的农产品需求有关。 陆地保护地内的生境质量和生境退化趋势.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14348Subventions
Organisme : The National Key R&D Program of China
ID : 2022YFE0209400
Organisme : China Scholarship Council
ID : 202206210188
Organisme : Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
ID : 20223080017
Organisme : University Research Fellowship from the Royal Society
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Society for Conservation Biology.
Références
Banks‐Leite, C., Ewers, R. M., Folkard‐Tapp, H., & Fraser, A. (2020). Countering the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation through habitat restoration. One Earth, 3, 672–676.
Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Dudley, N., & Hockings, M. (2017). Understanding local‐scale drivers of biodiversity outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1399, 42–60.
Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Harrison, L. B., Geldmann, J., Collen, B., Whitmee, S., Balmford, A., Burgess, N. D., Brooks, T., Hockings, M., & Woodley, S. (2016). Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio‐economic metrics and body size. Nature Communications, 7, Article 12747.
Boitani, L., Cowling, R. M., Dublin, H. T., Mace, G. M., Parrish, J., Possingham, H. P., Pressey, R. L., Rondinini, C., & Wilson, K. A. (2008). Change the IUCN protected area categories to reflect biodiversity outcomes. PLoS Biology, 6, Article e66.
Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11, 169–178.
Busch, J., & Ferretti‐Gallon, K. (2017). What drives deforestation and what stops it? A meta‐analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11, 3–23.
Butchart, S. H. M., Clarke, M., Smith, R. J., Sykes, R. E., Scharlemann, J. P., Harfoot, M., Buchanan, G. M., Angulo, A., Balmford, A., Bertzky, B., Brooks, T. M., & Burgess, N. D. (2015). Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters, 8, 329–337.
Cao, Y., Tseng, T. H., Wang, F. Y., Jacobson, A., Yu, L., Zhao, J. Q., Carver, S., Locke, H., Zhao, Z. C., & Yang, R. (2022). Potential wilderness loss could undermine the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework. Biological Conservation, 275, Article 109753.
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) Columbia University. (2018). Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
Chen, X., Yu, L., Cao, Y., Xu, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhuang, Y., Liu, X., Du, Z., Liu, T., Yang, B., He, L., Wu, H., Yang, R., & Gong, P. (2023). Habitat quality dynamics in China's first group of national parks in recent four decades: Evidence from land use and land cover changes. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, Article 116505.
Chen, X., Yu, L., Du, Z. R., Xu, Y. D., Zhao, J. Y., Zhao, H. L., Zhang, G. L., Peng, D. L., & Gong, P. (2022). Distribution of ecological restoration projects associated with land use and land cover change in China and their ecological impacts. Science of The Total Environment, 825, Article 153938.
Cimatti, M., Ranc, N., Benítez‐López, A., Maiorano, L., Boitani, L., Cagnacci, F., Čengić, M., Ciucci, P., Huijbregts, M. A., Krofel, M., López‐Bao, J. V., & Santini, L. (2021). Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes. Diversity and Distributions, 27, 602–617.
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store. (2019). Land cover classification gridded maps from 1992 to present derived from satellite observation. https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite‐land‐cover?tab=overview
Danielson, J. J., & Gesch, D. B. (2011). Global multi‐resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010). https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1073/pdf/of2011‐1073.pdf
Delzeit, R., Zabel, F., Meyer, C., & Václavík, T. (2016). Addressing future trade‐offs between biodiversity and cropland expansion to improve food security. Regional Environmental Change, 17, 1429–1441.
Dinerstein, E., Olson, D., Joshi, A., Vynne, C., Burgess, N. D., Wikramanayake, E., Hahn, N., Palminteri, S., Hedao, P., Noss, R., Hansen, M., Locke, H., Ellis, E. C., Jones, B., Barber, C. V., Hayes, R., Kormos, C., Martin, V., Crist, E., … Saleem, M. (2017). An ecoregion‐based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience, 67, 534–545.
Dudley, N. (Ed.). (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN.
Duro, J. A., Lauk, C., Kastner, T., Erb, K. H., & Haberl, H. (2020). Global inequalities in food consumption, cropland demand and land‐use efficiency: A decomposition analysis. Global Environmental Change, 64, Article 102124.
European Space Agency (ESA). (2017). Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download/ESACCI‐LC‐Ph2‐PUGv2_2.0.pdf.
Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Pub.
Fan, X., Xu, W., Zang, Z., & Ouyang, Z. (2023). Representativeness of China's protected areas in conserving its diverse terrestrial ecosystems. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 9, Article 0029.
Fuente, B., Bertzky, B., Delli, G., Mandrici, A., Conti, M., Florczyk, A. J., Freire, S., Schiavina, M., Bastin, L., & Dubois, G. (2020). Built‐up areas within and around protected areas: Global patterns and 40‐year trends. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, Article e01291.
Gatiso, T. T., Kulik, L., Bachmann, M., Bonn, A., Bösch, L., Eirdosh, D., Freytag, A., Hanisch, S., Heurich, M., Sop, T., Wesche, K., & Kühl, H. S. (2022). Effectiveness of protected areas influenced by socio‐economic context. Nature Sustainability, 5, 861–868.
Geldmann, J., Barnes, M., Coad, L., Craigie, I. D., Hockings, M., & Burgess, N. D. (2013). Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation, 161, 230–238.
Geldmann, J., Coad, L., Barnes, M. D., Craigie, I. D., Woodley, S., Balmford, A., Brooks, T. M., Hockings, M., Knights, K., Mascia, M. B., McRae, L., & Burgess, N. D. (2018). A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11, Article e12434.
Geldmann, J., Joppa, L. N., & Burgess, N. D. (2014). Mapping change in human pressure globally on land and within protected areas. Conservation Biology, 28, 1604–1616.
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L., & Balmford, A. (2019). A global‐level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 23209–23215.
Gray, C. L., Hill, S. L., Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Borger, L., Contu, S., Hoskins, A. J., Ferrier, S., Purvis, A., & Scharlemann, J. P. (2016). Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature Communications, 7, Article 12306.
Güneralp, B., & Seto, K. C. (2013). Futures of global urban expansion: Uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environmental Research Letters, 8, Article 014025.
Holland, T. G., Peterson, G. D., & Gonzalez, A. (2009). A cross‐national analysis of how economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. Conservation Biology, 23, 1304–1313.
Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat.
Jiang, L. W., & O'Neill, B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 193–199.
Johnson, C. N., Balmford, A., Brook, B. W., Buettel, J. C., Galetti, M., Guangchun, L., & Wilmshurst, J. M. (2017). Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 356, 270–275.
Jones, K. R., Venter, O., Fuller, R. A., Allan, J. R., Maxwell, S. L., Negret, P. J., & Watson, J. E. M. (2018). One‐third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science, 360, 788–791.
Joppa, L. N., & Pfaff, A. (2011). Global protected area impacts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1633–1638.
Kauano, É. E., Silva, J. M. C., Diniz Filho, J. A. F., & Michalski, F. (2020). Do protected areas hamper economic development of the Amazon region? An analysis of the relationship between protected areas and the economic growth of Brazilian Amazon municipalities. Land Use Policy, 92, Article 104473.
Laurance, W. F., Useche, D. C., Rendeiro, J., Kalka, M., Bradshaw, C. J., Sloan, S. P., Laurance, S. G., Campbell, M., Abernethy, K., Alvarez, P., Arroyo‐Rodriguez, V., Ashton, P., Benítez‐Malvido, J., Blom, A., Bobo, K. S., Cannon, C. H., Cao, M., Carroll, R., Chapman, C., … Zamzani, F. (2012). Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature, 489, 290–294.
Leberger, R., Rosa, I. M. D., Guerra, C. A., Wolf, F., & Pereira, H. M. (2020). Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas. Biological Conservation, 241, Article 108299.
Leroux, S. J., & Kerr, J. T. (2013). Land development in and around protected areas at the wilderness frontier. Conservation Biology, 27, 166–176.
Leroux, S. J., Krawchuk, M. A., Schmiegelow, F., Cumming, S. G., Lisgo, K., Anderson, L. G., & Petkova, M. (2010). Global protected areas and IUCN designations: Do the categories match the conditions? Biological Conservation, 143, 609–616.
Li, G. D., Fang, C., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, S., He, S., Qi, W., Bao, C., Ma, H., Fan, Y., Feng, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity. Nature Communications, 13, Article 1628.
Martinuzzi, S., Radeloff, V. C., Joppa, L. N., Hamilton, C. M., Helmers, D. P., Plantinga, A. J., & Lewis, D. J. (2015). Scenarios of future land use change around United States' protected areas. Biological Conservation, 184, 446–455.
Maxwell, S. L., Cazalis, V., Dudley, N., Hoffmann, M., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Stolton, S., Visconti, P., Woodley, S., Kingston, N., Lewis, E., Maron, M., Strassburg, B. B. N., Wenger, A., Jonas, H. D., Venter, O., & Watson, J. E. M. (2020). Area‐based conservation in the twenty‐first century. Nature, 586, 217–227.
McDonald, R. I., Forman, R. T. T., Kareiva, P., Neugarten, R., Salzer, D., & Fisher, J. (2009). Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93, 63–75.
McDonald, R. I., Kareiva, P., & Formana, R. T. T. (2008). The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 141, 1695–1703.
Meng, Z. Q., Dong, J. W., Ellis, E. C., Metternicht, G., Qin, Y. W., Song, X. P., Löfqvist, S., Garrett, R. D., Jia, X. P., & Xiao, X. M. (2023). Post‐2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas. Nature Sustainability, 6, 758–768.
National Earth System Science Data Center, National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China. (2016). Spatial Distribution Dataset of Nature Reserves in Chinese mainland from 2013 to 2016. http://www.geodata.cn/data/datadetails.html?dataguid=258874459422057&docid=3872
Natural Capital Project. (2022). InVEST 3.11.0 User's Guide. https://storage.googleapis.com/releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest‐userguide/latest/en/index.html#id5
Nelson, A., & Chomitz, K. M. (2011). Effectiveness of strict vs. multiple use protected areas in reducing tropical forest fires: A global analysis using matching methods. PLoS ONE, 6, Article e22722.
Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Hill, S. L., Contu, S., Lysenko, I., Senior, R. A., Börger, L., Bennett, D. J., Choimes, A., Collen, B., Day, J., De Palma, A., Díaz, S., Echeverria‐Londoño, S., Edgar, M. J., Feldman, A., Garon, M., Harrison, M. L., Alhusseini, T., … Purvis, A. (2015). Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520, 45–50.
Nolte, C., Agrawal, A., Silvius, K. M., & Soares‐Filho, B. S. (2013). Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 4956–4961.
Ortiz, A. M. D., Outhwaite, C. L., Dalin, C., & Newbold, T. (2021). A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: Research and policy priorities. One Earth, 4, 88–103.
Peng, Y., Fan, J., Xing, S., & Cui, G. (2018). Overview and classification outlook of natural protected areas in mainland China. Biodiversity Science, 26, 315–325.
Powlen, K. A., Salerno, J., Jones, K. W., & Gavin, M. C. (2023). Identifying socioeconomic and biophysical factors driving forest loss in protected areas. Conservation Biology, 37, Article e14058.
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008). Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, Article GB1003.
Ramankutty, N., Foley, J. A., Norman, J., & McSweeney, K. (2002). The global distribution of cultivable lands: Current patterns and sensitivity to possible climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 377–392.
Sallustio, L., De Toni, A., Strollo, A., Di Febbraro, M., Gissi, E., Casella, L., Geneletti, D., Munafo, M., Vizzarri, M., & Marchetti, M. (2017). Assessing habitat quality in relation to the spatial distribution of protected areas in Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 129–137.
Schulze, K., Knights, K., Coad, L., Geldmann, J., Leverington, F., Eassom, A., Marr, M., Butchart, S. H. M., Hockings, M., & Burgess, N. D. (2018). An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11, Article e12435.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2022). Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15‐final‐text‐kunming‐montreal‐gbf‐221222
Spracklen, B. D., Kalamandeen, M., Galbraith, D., Gloor, E., & Spracklen, D. V. (2015). A global analysis of deforestation in moist tropical forest protected areas. PLoS ONE, 10, Article e0143886.
Terrado, M., Sabater, S., Chaplin‐Kramer, B., Mandle, L., Ziv, G., & Acuna, V. (2016). Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Science of the Total Environment, 540, 63–70.
Tilman, D., Clark, M., Williams, D. R., Kimmel, K., Polasky, S., & Packer, C. (2017). Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature, 546, 73–81.
Tong, X., Brandt, M., Yue, Y., Zhang, X., Fensholt, R., Ciais, P., Wang, K., Liu, S., Zhang, W., Mao, C., & Jepsen, M. R. (2023). Reforestation policies around 2000 in southern China led to forest densification and expansion in the 2010s. Communications Earth & Environment, 4, Article 260.
UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP‐WCMC). & International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2022). World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Author.
UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP‐WCMC). & International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (2024). Terrestrial and inland waters protected area coverage. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en
Venter, O., Sanderson, E. W., Magrach, A., Allan, J. R., Beher, J., Jones, K. R., Possingham, H. P., Laurance, W. F., Wood, P., Fekete, B. M., Levy, M. A., & Watson, J. E. (2016). Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nature Communications, 7, Article 12558.
Vijay, V., & Armsworth, P. R. (2021). Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade‐offs between conservation and food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, Article e2010121118.
Waldron, A., Mooers, A. O., Miller, D. C., Nibbelink, N., Redding, D., Kuhn, T. S., Roberts, J. T., & Gittleman, J. L. (2013). Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 12144–12148.
Ward, M., Saura, S., Williams, B., Ramirez‐Delgado, J. P., Arafeh‐Dalmau, N., Allan, J. R., Venter, O., Dubois, G., & Watson, J. E. M. (2020). Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land. Nature Communications, 11, Article 4563.
Watson, J. E., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67–73.
Wolf, C., Levi, T., Ripple, W. J., Zarrate‐Charry, D. A., & Betts, M. G. (2021). A forest loss report card for the world's protected areas. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5, 520–+.
World Bank. (2022a). Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land). Author.
World Bank. (2022b). GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2017 international $). Author.
World Bank. (2022c). Gini index. Author.
Wu, J., Li, X., Luo, Y., & Zhang, D. (2021). Spatiotemporal effects of urban sprawl on habitat quality in the Pearl River Delta from 1990 to 2018. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 13981.
Wu, R., Zhang, S., Yu, D. W., Zhao, P., Li, X., Wang, L., Yu, Q., Ma, J., Chen, A., & Long, Y. (2011). Effectiveness of China's nature reserves in representing ecological diversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 383–389.
Zhao, J. Q., Cao, Y., Yu, L., Liu, X. P., Yang, R., & Gong, P. (2022). Future global conflict risk hotspots between biodiversity conservation and food security: 10 countries and 7 Biodiversity Hotspots. Global Ecology and Conservation, 34, Article e02036.