Systematic review and meta-analysis of ROSA vs. conventional therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage.
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Meta-analysis
ROSA
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Aug 2024
21 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
07
2024
accepted:
31
07
2024
medline:
21
8
2024
pubmed:
21
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative and short-term results of the Robot of Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) compared to traditional approaches in individuals with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We will perform a comprehensive computerized search of PubMed, CNKI, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify relevant literature on ROSA vs. conventional therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage, covering publications from the inception of each database until July 2024. This study will include both English and Chinese language studies. Literature screening will adhere strictly to inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. The ROBINS-I tool is utilized for evaluating bias risk in non-RCTs. Analysis of the data from the studies included will be conducted with Review Manager 5.4.1. The final analysis included 7 retrospective cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled study, involving a total of 844 patients. Among these, 433 patients underwent ROSA, while 411 received conventional treatment (conservative treatment, conventional craniotomy, or stereotactic frame-assisted surgery). Compared to conventional therapy, patients treated with ROSA showed improvements in operative time, postoperative rebleeding, postoperative extubation time, and intracranial infection. Nonetheless, there was no notable contrast in mortality or central hyperthermia outcomes between the two treatments. ROSA is a safe and viable option for treating patients with cerebral hemorrhage, showing significant advantages in terms of surgery duration, postoperative rebleeding, time to remove the breathing tube, and intracranial infection compared to conservative treatment, traditional craniotomy, or stereotactic surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39167315
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02074-7
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-02074-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
326Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Blacquiere D, Demchuk AM, Al-Hazzaa M et al (2015) Intracerebral Hematoma morphologic appearance on noncontrast computed tomography predicts significant hematoma expansion. Stroke 46(11):3111–3116. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010566
pubmed: 26451019
Ikram MA, Wieberdink RG, Koudstaal PJ (2012) International epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Atheroscler Rep 14(4):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-012-0252-1
pubmed: 22538431
pmcid: 3388250
Russell MW, Boulanger L, Joshi AV et al (2006) The economic burden of intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence from managed care. Manag Care Interface. 19(6):24–28
pubmed: 16892657
Hemphill JC, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS et al (2015) Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 46(7):2032–2060. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000069
pubmed: 26022637
Brouwers HB, Goldstein JN (2012) Therapeutic strategies in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurotherapeutics 9(1):87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-011-0091-8
pubmed: 22139592
Newell DW, Shah MM, Wilcox R et al (2011) Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using sonothrombolysis. J Neurosurg 115(3):592–601. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.5.JNS10505
pubmed: 21663412
pmcid: 3785332
Nagasaka T, Tsugeno M, Ikeda H et al (2011) Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuro endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunctional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with craniotomy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 20(3):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.11.021
pubmed: 20621516
Vespa P, McArthur D, Miller C et al (2005) Frameless stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis of deep intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with reduction of hemorrhage volume and neurological improvement. Neurocrit Care 2(3):274–281. https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:2:3:274
pubmed: 16159075
Wang GQ, Li SQ, Huang YH et al (2014) Can minimally invasive puncture and drainage for hypertensive spontaneous Basal Ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage improve patient outcome: a prospective non-randomized comparative study. Mil Med Res 1:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-10
pubmed: 25722868
pmcid: 4340857
Alan N, Patel A, Abou-Al-Shaar H et al (2021) Intraparenchymal hematoma and intraventricular catheter placement using robotic stereotactic assistance (ROSA): A single center preliminary experience. J Clin Neurosci 91:391–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.04.006
pubmed: 34373057
Tang X, Liu J, Zhang X et al (2018) A comparative study of different surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Anhui Med Pharmaceut J 22(5):843–847
Sun F, Yao H, Bao X et al (2022) The efficacy and safety of HoLEP for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large volume: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Mens Health 16(4):155798832211132. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883221113203
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
pubmed: 25524443
pmcid: 4383202
Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N et al (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333(7568):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597
pubmed: 16974018
pmcid: 1570006
Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0
pubmed: 11106885
Bao D, Ni S, Chang B et al (2024) Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study. Heliyon 10(4):e25912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25912
pubmed: 38384554
pmcid: 10878924
Han W, Xie A, Chen T et al (2024) Efficacy of robot-assisted minimally invasive stereotactic puncture therapy for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain and Behavior 14(2):e3402. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3402
pmcid: 10839123
Bin Li (2017) Efficacy of ROSA adjuvant therapy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Chinese Community Doctors 33(31):41–42
Tang Z, Huang W, Chen Q et al (2024) Curative effect analysis of robot-assisted drainage surgery in treatment of spontaneous hypertensive brainstem hemorrhage. Front Neurol 15:1352949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1352949
pubmed: 38469591
pmcid: 10925720
Wang Y, Jin H, Gong S et al (2019) Efficacy analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for small-volume spontaneous thalamic hemorrhage. World Neurosurgery 131:e543–e549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.224
pubmed: 31398520
Xu F, Tao Y, Sun X et al (2017) Comparative analysis of robot of stereotactic assistant system and traditional infratentorial craniotomy for treatment of cerebellar hemorrhage. Chin J Minim Invasive Neurosurg 22(2):57–59
Liang L, Li X, Dong H et al (2022) A comparative study on the efficacy of robot of stereotactic assistant and frame-assisted stereotactic drilling, drainage for intracerebral hematoma in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Pak J Med Sci 38(7):1796–1801. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.7.5481
pubmed: 36246717
pmcid: 9532654
Zazulia AR, Diringer MN, Derdeyn CP et al (1999) Progression of mass effect after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 30(6):1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.6.1167
pubmed: 10356094
Xi G, Keep RF, Hoff JT (2006) Mechanisms of brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage. Lancet Neurol 5(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70283-0
pubmed: 16361023
Keep RF, Xi G, Hua Y et al (2005) The deleterious or beneficial effects of different agents in intracerebral hemorrhage: think big, think small, or is hematoma size important? Stroke 36(7):1594–1596. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000170701.41507.e1
pubmed: 15933250
Han WY, Tao YQ, Xu F et al (2017) The short- and long-term efficacy analysis of stereotactic surgery combined external ventricular drainage in the treatment of the secondary intraventricular hemorrhage. Brain Behav 7(12):e00864. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.864
pubmed: 29299383
pmcid: 5745243
Le CS, di Hao X, Li JW et al (2019) CD200Fc improves neurological function by protecting the blood-brain barrier after intracerebral hemorrhage. Cell Transplant 28(9–10):1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689719857655
pubmed: 31208229
pmcid: 6767889
Alan N, Lee P, Ozpinar A et al (2017) Robotic Stereotactic Assistance (ROSA) utilization for minimally invasive placement of intraparenchymal hematoma and intraventricular catheters. World Neurosurg 108:996.e7-996.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.027
pubmed: 28919568
Vadera S, Chan A, Lo T et al (2017) Frameless stereotactic robot-assisted subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: case report. World Neurosurg 97:762.e11-762.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.009
pubmed: 26585721
Kim H, Edwards NJ, Choi HA et al (2016) Treatment strategies to attenuate perihematomal edema in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 94:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.093
pubmed: 27373415
Gebel JM, Jauch EC, Brott TG et al (2002) Natural history of perihematomal edema in patients with hyperacute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 33(11):2631–2635. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000035284.12699.84
pubmed: 12411653