Evolving consolidation patterns and outcomes for a large cohort of primary CNS lymphoma patients.


Journal

Blood advances
ISSN: 2473-9537
Titre abrégé: Blood Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101698425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Aug 2024
Historique:
accepted: 13 08 2024
received: 28 05 2024
revised: 12 08 2024
medline: 21 8 2024
pubmed: 21 8 2024
entrez: 21 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Consolidation strategies for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) after induction chemoimmunotherapy include whole-brain radiotherapy (≤24Gy reduced-dose [RD], >24Gy standard-dose [SD] WBRT) and cytarabine, non-myeloablative chemotherapy (NMC), or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT); however, comparative outcomes are lacking. PCNSL outcomes from 1983-2020 were stratified by decade and MSKCC recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. Clinicodemographic associations with consolidation were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by proportional hazards from consolidation. Of 559 patients, 385 (69%) were consolidated. Median follow-up and OS were 7.4 and 5.7 years, respectively. WBRT use declined (61% in 1990s vs. 12% in 2010s), while AHCT (4% in 1990s vs. 32% in 2010s) and NMC (27% in 1990s vs. 52% in 2010s) rose. Compared to RPA 1 (age<50), RPA 2 (age≥50, KPS≥70) was more likely to receive NMC. Those with partial response to induction were less likely to receive AHCT (OR 0.36, p=0.02). Among 351 with complete response to consolidation, only receipt of R-MPV induction was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.5, p=0.006). Among RPA 1, median PFS and OS were not reached for AHCT or RD-WBRT, vs. 2.5 and 13.0 years, respectively, after NMC. Among RPA class 3 (KPS<70), median PFS and OS post-RD-WBRT were 4.6 and 10 years, respectively, vs. 1.7 and 4.4 years post-NMC. No significant adjusted survival differences were seen across consolidation strategies. NMC is increasingly used in lieu of RD-WBRT despite a trend toward less favorable PFS. RD-WBRT can be considered in patients ineligible for AHCT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39167801
pii: 517518
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013780
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.

Auteurs

Kathryn R Tringale (KR)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States.

Michael Scordo (M)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Joachim Yahalom (J)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Charlie White (C)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Zhigang Zhang (Z)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Javin Schefflein (J)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Gustav Cederquist (G)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Lauren R Schaff (LR)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Lisa M DeAngelis (LM)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Brandon S Imber (BS)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Christian Grommes (C)

Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.

Classifications MeSH