High-resolution compound-specific mapping in works of art via data fusion of MA-XRPD with hyperspectral data (part 1: Method evaluation).

Cultural heritage Machine learning Random forest Reflectance imaging spectroscopy X-ray diffraction X-ray fluorescence

Journal

Talanta
ISSN: 1873-3573
Titre abrégé: Talanta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 2984816R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 24 05 2024
revised: 14 08 2024
accepted: 17 08 2024
medline: 22 8 2024
pubmed: 22 8 2024
entrez: 21 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hyperspectral imaging techniques have emerged as powerful tools for non-invasive investigation of artworks. This paper employs either reflectance imaging spectroscopy (RIS) or macroscopic X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) imaging in combination with macroscopic X-ray powder diffraction (MA-XRPD) for state-of-the-art chemical imaging of painted cultural heritage artefacts. While RIS can provide molecular information and MA-XRF can offer elemental distribution maps of paintings of high lateral resolution, the unique advantage of MA-XRPD lies in its ability to visualize the distributions of specific pigments and estimate in a quantitative manner the relative concentrations of the crystalline phases at the surface of artworks. However, MA-XRPD is more time-consuming and offers a lower lateral resolution than RIS and MA-XRF. This study introduces a machine learning (ML) approach to obtain the distribution of specific compounds on the surface of artworks with a resolution that is comparable to that of RIS and MA-XRF data but with the compound specificity of MA-XRPD. The general aim is to expedite non-destructive artwork imaging analysis by fusing data from different imaging modalities via machine learning models. The effect of preprocessing techniques to enhance the predictive accuracy of the models is explored. The paper demonstrates the method's efficacy on a 16th-century illuminated manuscript, showcasing the feasibility of predicting compound-specific distribution maps. Three evaluation methods-visual examination of the predicted distribution, root mean square errors (RMSE), and feature permutation importance (FPI)-are employed to assess model performance. Fusing MA-XRF with MA-XRPD led to the best RMSE scores overall. However, fusing the RIS and MA-XRPD data blocks also yield very satisfactory and easily interpretable high-resolution compound maps. While MA-XRPD allows for highly specific imaging of artworks, its time-consuming nature and limited resolution presents a bottleneck during non-invasive imaging of painted works of art. By integrating data from more time-efficient hyperspectral techniques such as MA-XRF and RIS, and employing machine learning, we expedite the process without compromising accuracy. The fusion process can also denoise the distribution maps, improving their readability for heritage professionals and art historical scholars.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hyperspectral imaging techniques have emerged as powerful tools for non-invasive investigation of artworks. This paper employs either reflectance imaging spectroscopy (RIS) or macroscopic X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) imaging in combination with macroscopic X-ray powder diffraction (MA-XRPD) for state-of-the-art chemical imaging of painted cultural heritage artefacts. While RIS can provide molecular information and MA-XRF can offer elemental distribution maps of paintings of high lateral resolution, the unique advantage of MA-XRPD lies in its ability to visualize the distributions of specific pigments and estimate in a quantitative manner the relative concentrations of the crystalline phases at the surface of artworks. However, MA-XRPD is more time-consuming and offers a lower lateral resolution than RIS and MA-XRF.
RESULTS RESULTS
This study introduces a machine learning (ML) approach to obtain the distribution of specific compounds on the surface of artworks with a resolution that is comparable to that of RIS and MA-XRF data but with the compound specificity of MA-XRPD. The general aim is to expedite non-destructive artwork imaging analysis by fusing data from different imaging modalities via machine learning models. The effect of preprocessing techniques to enhance the predictive accuracy of the models is explored. The paper demonstrates the method's efficacy on a 16th-century illuminated manuscript, showcasing the feasibility of predicting compound-specific distribution maps. Three evaluation methods-visual examination of the predicted distribution, root mean square errors (RMSE), and feature permutation importance (FPI)-are employed to assess model performance. Fusing MA-XRF with MA-XRPD led to the best RMSE scores overall. However, fusing the RIS and MA-XRPD data blocks also yield very satisfactory and easily interpretable high-resolution compound maps.
SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
While MA-XRPD allows for highly specific imaging of artworks, its time-consuming nature and limited resolution presents a bottleneck during non-invasive imaging of painted works of art. By integrating data from more time-efficient hyperspectral techniques such as MA-XRF and RIS, and employing machine learning, we expedite the process without compromising accuracy. The fusion process can also denoise the distribution maps, improving their readability for heritage professionals and art historical scholars.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39167937
pii: S0039-9140(24)01110-X
doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126731
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126731

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Arthur Gestels reports equipment, drugs, or supplies and writing assistance were provided by Netherlands National Museum. Arthur Gestels reports writing assistance was provided by Scientific Research Department at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. Arthur Gestels reports financial support was provided by Research Foundation Flanders. Arthur Gestels reports financial support was provided by Interreg Flanders-Netherlands. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Arthur Gestels (A)

University of Antwerp, Department of Physics, AXIS Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Engineering, Department Electromechanics InViLab Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: arthur.gestels@uantwerpen.be.

Francesca Gabrieli (F)

Conservation and Science Department, Rijksmuseum, Hobbemastraat 22, 1017 ZC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Thomas De Kerf (T)

University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Engineering, Department Electromechanics InViLab Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.

Frederik Vanmeert (F)

Conservation and Science Department, Rijksmuseum, Hobbemastraat 22, 1017 ZC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Hernan Fernández García (HF)

University of Antwerp, Department of Physics, AXIS Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.

John Delaney (J)

Scientific Research Department, National Gallery of Art, 6th and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20565, USA.

Koen Janssens (K)

University of Antwerp, Department of Physics, AXIS Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.

Gunther Steenackers (G)

University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Engineering, Department Electromechanics InViLab Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.

Steve Vanlanduit (S)

University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Engineering, Department Electromechanics InViLab Research Group, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH