Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now.
Journal
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
ISSN: 1940-5480
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9417468
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2024
16 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
30
12
2023
accepted:
29
06
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) will soon reach its 20-year anniversary in the United States and has now become the most performed shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. The evolution from Grammont style implants to lateralized designs continues to generate debate as comparable outcomes have been reported with both types of systems. While early literature focused on fixation and expanded indications, recent studies have evaluated component design and position and their effect on functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this article was to provide a synopsis of design rationales of current RSA prostheses and review outcomes related to RSA design and position.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39168092
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01265
pii: 00124635-990000000-01069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Références
Shoulder and Elbow Registry (SER): 2023 Annual Report. American Academic of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Rosemont, IL, 2023.
Wall B, Nové-Josserand L, O'Connor DP, Edwards TB, Walch G: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1476-1485.
Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M: The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1697-1705.
Mizuno N, Denard PJ, Raiss P, Walch G: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1297-1304.
Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D: The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:292-300.
Flatow EL, Harrison AK: A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2432-2439.
Cuff DJ, Pupello DR, Santoni BG, Clark RE, Frankle MA: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: A concise follow-up, at a minimum of 10 years, of previous Reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:1895-1899.
Cuff D, Clark R, Pupello D, Frankle M: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: A concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1996-2000.
Sheth MM, Heldt BL, Spell JH, et al.: Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A minimum of 10 years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:875-883.
Bacle G, Nové-Josserand L, Garaud P, Walch G: Long-Term outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A follow-up of a previous study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:454-461.
Gerber C, Canonica S, Catanzaro S, Ernstbrunner L: Longitudinal observational study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction: Results after 15 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018;27:831-838.
Grammont PM, Baulot E: The classic: Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. 1993. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2424.
Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Hovorka I: Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006;15:527-540.
Werthel J-D, Walch G, Vegehan E, Deransart P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Valenti P: Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop 2019;43:2349-2360.
Routman HD, Flurin P-H, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Hamilton MA, Roche CP: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis design classification system. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2015;73suppl 1:S5-S14.
Greiner S, Schmidt C, Herrmann S, Pauly S, Perka C: Clinical performance of lateralized versus non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015;24:1397-1404.
Southam BR, Bedeir YH, Johnson BM, Hasselfeld KA, Kloby MA, Grawe BM: Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A randomized control trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023;32:1420-1431.
Van de Kleut ML, Yuan X, Teeter MG, Athwal GS: Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. metal augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:591-600.
Gobezie R, Shishani Y, Lederman E, Denard PJ: Can a functional difference be detected in reverse arthroplasty with 135° versus 155° prosthesis for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy: A prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28:813-818.
Torrens C, Guirro P, Miquel J, Santana F: Influence of glenosphere size on the development of scapular notching: A prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:1735-1741.
Franceschetti E, Ranieri R, Giovanetti de Sanctis E, Palumbo A, Franceschi F: Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: A comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:58-67.
Larose G, Fisher ND, Gambhir N, et al.: Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:2410-2420.
Zhou Y, Mandaleson A, Frampton C, Hirner M: Medium-term results of inlay vs. onlay humeral components for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A New Zealand joint registry study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024;33:99-107.
Erickson BJ, Werner BC, Griffin JW, et al.: A comprehensive evaluation of the association of radiographic measures of lateralization on clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:963-970.
Schippers P, Lacouture J-D, Junker M, et al.: Can we separately measure glenoid versus humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023;33:1169-1176.