The Human Fluorescence Discrimination as Precondition for the Use of Fluorescence-aided Identification Techniques (FIT).

FIT Fluorescence perceptibility Fluorescence-aided identification technique Professional experience Tooth-colored dental materials Visual aging

Journal

Journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1879-176X
Titre abrégé: J Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0354422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 30 07 2024
revised: 14 08 2024
accepted: 16 08 2024
medline: 22 8 2024
pubmed: 22 8 2024
entrez: 21 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT) is based on the fluorescence properties of dental materials, specifically the intensity of their fluorescence compared to the autofluorescence of hard dental substances; this creates a perceived contrast between dental material and tooth. However, no studies to date have determined the extent to which the fluorescence intensity of tooth-colored dental materials must differ from that of natural autofluorescence to ensure reliable visual detection. The aim of this study was therefore to determine, for the first time, how pronounced the difference between fluorescence intensity and autofluorescence must be to reliably identify tooth-colored material. Ten dentists assessed six different resin-based composite (RBC) samples of varying fluorescence intensity placed in the cavities of ten extracted teeth under standardized fluorescence-exciting illumination. The outcome variable was fluorescence perceptibility. Their assessments of the outcome variable were compared with measurements of the fluorescence intensities of the RBCs and the surrounding dental hard tissues, which were expressed as a fluorescence intensity ratio. Demographic data of the participants, including age, gender, and professional experience, were also recorded. No significant differences were found for visual fluorescence perceptibility in relation to the explanatory variables of gender (p = 0.14), age (p = 0.13), and professional experience (p = 0.34). In contrast, the fluorescence intensity ratio was significantly different (p < 0.0001). For both clinicians and manufacturers, fluorescence intensity levels are important when selecting or developing FIT-compatible materials. Our results suggest that the fluorescence intensity levels of dental materials should be no more than 75% and no less than 200% of tooth natural autofluorescence to ensure reliable detection of tooth-colored materials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39168231
pii: S0300-5712(24)00483-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105314
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105314

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Christian Klein (C)

Clinic of Conservative and Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontology, and Endodontology, University Hospital for Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; HealthCare Center Meller Zahngesundheit Schlauzahn MVZ GmbH, Waiblingen, Germany. Electronic address: christian.klein@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Klaudia Sakar (K)

Clinic of Conservative and Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontology, and Endodontology, University Hospital for Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Bogomil Voykov (B)

Center for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Christian Meller (C)

Clinic of Conservative and Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontology, and Endodontology, University Hospital for Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH