The effect of different functional appliances on the sagittal pharyngeal airway dimension in skeletal class II: a retrospective study.
Class II
Invisalign mandibular advancement
Myobrace
Myofunctional appliance
Sagittal pharyngeal airway dimension
Twinblock
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 08 2024
21 08 2024
Historique:
received:
08
05
2024
accepted:
07
08
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the changes in the sagittal pharyngeal airway dimension (SPAD) in adolescents with Class II mandibular retrusion treated with Invisalign Mandibular Advancement (IMA), prefabricated Myobrace (MB), and Twin block (TB). For this retrospective study, the pre-treatment and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of 60 patients who underwent myofunctional treatment, using either one of the tested appliances were gathered from the files of treated patients. Changes in the SPAD were measured in each group, and comparisons were carried out between the three study groups. Additionally, sagittal skeletal measurements were carried out. Comparisons of the study variables at T0 and T1 between the three groups were performed using one-way ANOVA, while comparisons of the difference (T1-T0) were performed using Kruskal Wallis test. A significant SPAD increase has been reported using the three tested appliances (p < 0.05), with the least change documented with MB use (p < 0.05). Significant antero-posterior improvements have been found with IMA, MB, and TB with an increase in the SNB°, and a decrease in ANB° and Wits appraisal (p < 0.05). Non-significant FMA° changes have been observed post-treatment in the three test groups (p > 0.05). The IMA, MB, and TB generated significant SPAD and sagittal changes, with both IMA and TB surpassing MB in the airway area improvement post-treatment. Moreover, the three tested Class II functional appliances did not affect the vertical dimension.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39169053
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69717-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69717-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19410Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Alhammadi, M. S., Halboub, E., Fayed, M. S., Labib, A. & El-Saaidi, C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J. Orthod. 23(40), e1-40.e10 (2018).
McNamara, J. A. Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 51, 177–202 (1981).
pubmed: 7023290
Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W. Jr. & Moray, L. J. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: Estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 13, 97–106 (1998).
pubmed: 9743642
Indriksone, I. & Jakobsone, G. The upper airway dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns: A systematic review. Stomatologija 16, 109–117 (2014).
pubmed: 25471995
Kirjavainen, M. & Kirjavainen, T. Upper airway dimensions in Class II malocclusion. Effects of headgear treatment. Angle Orthod. 77, 1046–1053 (2007).
pubmed: 18004913
doi: 10.2319/081406-332
Nanda, M., Singla, A., Negi, A., Jaj, H. & Mahajan, V. The association between maxillomandibular sagittal relationship and pharyngeal airway passage dimensions. J. Indian Orthod. Soc. 46, 48–52 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/0974909820120108
Ghodke, S., Utreja, A. K., Singh, S. P. & Jena, A. K. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Prog. Orthod. 15, 68 (2014).
pubmed: 25534004
pmcid: 4274348
doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0068-3
Xiang, M., Hu, B., Liu, Y., Sun, J. & Song, J. Changes in airway dimensions following functional appliances in growing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 97, 170–180 (2017).
pubmed: 28483230
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.009
Hänggi, M. P., Teuscher, U. M., Roos, M. & Peltomäki, T. A. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur. J. Orthod. 30, 598–605 (2008).
pubmed: 18974068
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn055
Kannan, A., Sathyanarayana, H. P. & Padmanabhan, S. Effect of functional appliances on the airway dimensions in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion: A systematic review. J. Orthod. Sci. 6, 54–64 (2017).
pubmed: 28546958
pmcid: 5433105
doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_154_16
Gill, D., Sharma, A., Naini, F. & Jones, S. The twin block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion. Dent. Update. 32, 158–168 (2005).
pubmed: 15881511
doi: 10.12968/denu.2005.32.3.158
Gülsoy, B. & Yavan, M. A. Conventional twin-block versus cervical headgear and twin-block combination: Therapeutic effects on the craniofacial structures in growing subjects. Turk. J. Orthod. 36, 149–157 (2023).
pubmed: 37781997
pmcid: 10548055
doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.84
Lombardo, E. C. et al. Dentoskeletal effects of clear aligner vs twin block-a short-term study of functional appliances. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2023, 89 (2023).
Elfeky, Y. H. & Fayed, M. M. Three-dimensional effects of twin block therapy on pharyngeal airway parameters in Class II malocclusion patients. J. World Fed. Orthod. 4, 114–119 (2015).
Yavan, M. A., Aycan, M., Aysoyler, D. & Essiz, A. Comparison of twin block appliance and Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapies on uvuloglossopharyngeal dimensions: A retrospective study. APOS Trends Orthod. 11, 23–31 (2021).
doi: 10.25259/APOS_173_2020
Anastasi, G. & Dinnella, A. Myobrace System: A no-braces approach to malocclusion and a myofunctional therapy device. Orthodontics 2014, 5 (2014).
Akin, M., Ucar, F. I., Chousein, C. & Sari, Z. Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects. J. Orofacial Orthop. 76, 520 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00056-015-0315-3
Oktay, H. & Ulukaya, E. Maxillary protraction appliance effect on the size of the upper airway passage. Angle Orthod. 78, 209–214 (2008).
pubmed: 18251620
doi: 10.2319/122806-535.1
Yue, Z. et al. Comparison of invisalign mandibular advancement and twin-block on upper airway and hyoid bone position improvements for skeletal class II children: A retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 23, 661 (2023).
pubmed: 37705022
pmcid: 10500932
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03295-2
Çoban Büyükbayraktar, Z. & Camcı, H. Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: A retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 23, 53 (2023).
pubmed: 36717838
pmcid: 9887833
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02773-x
Petrie, A. & Sabin, C. Medical Statistics at a Glance 3rd edn. (Blackwell, 2009).
Hassel, B. & Farman, A. G. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 107, 58–66 (1995).
pubmed: 7817962
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70157-5
Savoldi, F. et al. Reliability of lateral cephalometric radiographs in the assessment of the upper airway in children: A retrospective study. Angle Orthod. 90, 47–55 (2020).
pubmed: 31403838
doi: 10.2319/022119-131.1
Malkoc, S., Usumez, S., Nur, M. & Donaghy, C. E. Reproducibility of airway dimensions and tongue and hyoid positions on lateral cephalograms. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 128, 513–516 (2005).
pubmed: 16214635
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.001
Buyukcavus, M. H. & Kale, B. Skeletal and dental effects of twin-block appliances in patients treated with or without expansion. Turk. J. Orthod. 34, 155–162 (2021).
pubmed: 35110185
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20103
Madian, A. M. & Elfouly, D. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 23, 998 (2023).
pubmed: 38093237
pmcid: 10720117
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03701-9
Achmad, H. & Auliya, N. Management of malocclusion in children using myobrace appliance: A systematic review. F1000Res 13, 53 (2024).
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51879.1
Johnson, J. S. et al. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on class II division I malocclusion. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 14, S10–S17 (2021).
pubmed: 35082460
pmcid: 8754264
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2013
Clark, W. J. Twin block functional therapy. Applications in dentofacial orthopaedics. Orthodontics 1995, 856 (1995).
Ramirez-Yañez, G., Sidlauskas, A., Junior, E. & Fluter, J. Dimensional changes in dental arches after treatment with a prefabricated functional appliance. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 31, 279–283 (2007).
pubmed: 19161066
doi: 10.17796/jcpd.31.4.d7p31201572n72h2
Chand, K., Jacob, S. & Charles, A. Assesment of changes in the sagittal pharyngeal airway dimensions post twin-block therapy using polar planimeter. SRM J. Res. Dent. Sci. 8, 51–57 (2017).
doi: 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_79_16
Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).
pubmed: 27330520
pmcid: 4913118
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Jena, A. K., Singh, S. P. & Utreja, A. K. Sagittal mandibular development effects on the dimensions of the awake pharyngeal airway passage. Angle Orthod. 80, 1061–1067 (2010).
pubmed: 20677955
pmcid: 8929504
doi: 10.2319/030210-125.1
Jena, A. K., Duggal, R. & Parkash, H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A comparative study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 130, 594–602 (2006).
pubmed: 17110256
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.025
Baccetti, T., Franchi, L., Toth, L. R. & McNamara, J. A. Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 118, 159–170 (2000).
pubmed: 10935956
doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.105571
Singh, S. et al. Timing of myofunctional appliance therapy. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 35, 233–240 (2010).
pubmed: 21417131
doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.9572h13218806871
Kim, J. E. et al. Effects of the long-term use of maxillary protraction facemasks with skeletal anchorage on pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing patients with cleft lip and palate. Korean J. Orthod. 50, 238–248 (2020).
pubmed: 32632043
pmcid: 7369382
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.4.238
Baloş Tuncer, B., Ulusoy, Ç., Tuncer, C., Türköz, Ç. & Kale Varlik, S. Effects of reverse headgear on pharyngeal airway in patients with different vertical craniofacial features. Braz. Oral Res. 29, 1–8 (2015).
doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0057
Restrepo, C., Santamaría, A., Peláez, S. & Tapias, A. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J. Oral Rehabil. 38, 588–594 (2011).
pubmed: 21294763
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02199.x
Riley, R., Powell, N. & Guilleminault, C. Cephalometric roentgenograms and computerized tomographic scans in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 9, 514–515 (1986).
pubmed: 3809865
doi: 10.1093/sleep/9.4.514
Jeans, W. D., Fernando, D. C., Maw, A. R. & Leighton, B. C. A longitudinal study of the growth of the nasopharynx and its contents in normal children. Br. J. Radiol. 54, 117–121 (1981).
pubmed: 7459548
doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-54-638-117
Aboudara, C. et al. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 135, 468–479 (2009).
pubmed: 19361733
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.043
Tsuiki, S., Lowe, A. A., Almeida, F. R., Kawahata, N. & Fleetham, J. A. Effects of mandibular advancement on airway curvature and obstructive sleep apnoea severity. Eur. Respir. J. 23, 263–268 (2024).
doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00094304
Ahn, E. S., Kim, A. H., Shim, Y. S. & An, S. Y. Oropharyngeal airway three-dimensional changes after treatment with myobrace in class II retrognathic children. Iran. J. Public Health. 46, 265–267 (2017).
pubmed: 28451565
pmcid: 5402788
Yıldırım, E. & Karaçay, Ş. Volumetric evaluation of pharyngeal airway after functional therapy. Scanning. 2021, 6694992 (2021).
pubmed: 33680278
pmcid: 7906813
doi: 10.1155/2021/6694992
Göymen, M., Mourad, D. & Güleç, A. Evaluation of airway measurements in class II patients following functional treatment. Turk. J. Orthod. 32, 6–10 (2019).
pubmed: 30944893
pmcid: 6436910
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18050
Mohamed, R. N., Basha, S. & Al-Thomali, Y. Changes in upper airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with twin block appliance: A systematic review. Turk. J. Orthod. 33, 59 (2020).
pubmed: 32284900
pmcid: 7138231
doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19028
Elhamouly, Y., El-Housseiny, A. A., Ismail, H. A. & Habashy, L. M. E. Myofunctional trainer versus twin block in developing class II division I malocclusion: A randomized comparative clinical trial. Dent. J. 8, 44 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/dj8020044
Mohammed, H., Čirgić, E., Rizk, M. Z. & Vandevska-Radunovic, V. Effectiveness of prefabricated myofunctional appliances in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: A systematic review. Eur. J. Orthod. 42, 125–134 (2020).
pubmed: 31329848
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz025
Ferreira, F. Novel approaches for class II malocclusion treatment using myofunctional orthodontics therapy: A systematic review. Int. J. Dent. Oral Sci. 4, 503–507 (2017).
Caruso, S. et al. Mandibular advancement with clear aligners in the treatment of skeletal Class II. A retrospective controlled study. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 22, 26–30 (2021).
pubmed: 33719479
Blackham, S. S. A study of short-term skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusions treated with InvisalignⓇ with Mandibular Advancement Feature or Twin Block appliance compared with historical controls: Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia (2020).