Digitally-assisted Design for Precise Mandibular Defect Repair Using Autogenous Bone.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
12
06
2024
accepted:
25
06
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
22
8
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study introduces a novel surgical technique that leverages digital design for the precise repair of mandibular defects resulting from benign jaw tumors. The restoration of the mandibular defect is accomplished through autologous bone grafting from the mandible itself. This method significantly diminishes surgical complexity and risk, meeting the patient's preference to avoid additional surgical sites. Notably, 15 months postsurgery, the patient's mandible dimensions were suitable for dental implantation. Therefore, this technique has proven effective in repairing mandibular defects caused by the excision of benign tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39171909
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010502
pii: 00001665-990000000-01822
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Sham E, Leong J, Maher R, et al. Mandibular ameloblastoma: clinical experience and literature review. ANZ J Surg 2009;79:739–744
Soluk-Tekkesin M, Sinanoglu A, Selvi F, et al. The importance of clinical and radiological findings for the definitive histopathologic diagnosis of benign fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws: Study of 276 cases. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;123:364–371
Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, et al. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1200–1206
Ren ZH, Fan TF, Zhang S, et al. Nonvascularized Iliac Bone Reconstruction for the Mandible Without Maxillofacial Skin Scarring. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78:288–294
Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant'Anna E, et al. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:767–774
He J, Zhao B, Deng C, et al. Assessment of implant cumulative survival rates in sites with different bone density and related prognostic factors: an 8-year retrospective study of 2,684 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:360–371
Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, et al. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone 2005;37:776–780
Hu W, Thadani S, Mukul SK, et al. Autogeneous coronoid process as free graft for reconstruction of mandibular condyle in patients with temporomandibular ankylosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;18:313–323.
Vermeeren JIJF, Wismeijer D, Waas MAJ. One-step reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible with onlay bone grafts and endosteal implants. A 5-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:112–115