Kneel, stand, prostrate: The psychology of prayer postures in three world religions.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
13
12
2023
accepted:
22
06
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
22
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most people practice a religion, often multiple times daily. Among the most visible aspects of these practices are body postures, which according to embodiment theories, likely shape the psychological experience of religion. In a preregistered study, we test this idea among Christians, Muslims, and Hindus in the United States, Turkey, and India (N = 2,458). In a repeated-measures experimental design, participants imagined praying in various typical postures, then reported their affective experiences, perceived relationship with deity, and prayer content for each posture. Compared to downward and constrictive postures, expansive and upward postures led to more positive emotions, dominance, and praise-focused prayers, yet fewer introspective or intercessory prayers. Interestingly, these effects varied based on religious context (e.g., many Hindus found upward and expansive postures offensive, causing no positive affect). We further explored whether these effects varied based on posture familiarity, religiosity, interoceptive sensibility, and personality traits. This research provides unique data on embodied processes shaping affect and cognition in religious practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39173058
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306924
pii: PONE-D-23-40081
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0306924Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Cappellen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48230
pubmed: 23133619
Cogn Emot. 2022 Nov;36(7):1327-1342
pubmed: 35924432
Emotion. 2023 Jun;23(4):973-985
pubmed: 36048034
Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1050-7
pubmed: 18031411
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):49-59
pubmed: 20023208
Psychol Sci. 2004 Mar;15(3):194-7
pubmed: 15016291
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):705-16
pubmed: 22777820
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S103-9
pubmed: 11373140
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59
pubmed: 7962581
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;10(6):852-64
pubmed: 26581739
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):365-76
pubmed: 12585810
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):737-49
pubmed: 22905770
Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1361-1376
pubmed: 27626675
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):255-9
pubmed: 23548985
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):808-23
pubmed: 18444740
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 24;6:6
pubmed: 25759672
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;54:143-149
pubmed: 27494342
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):6-27
pubmed: 27362267
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45
pubmed: 17705682
Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):898-924
pubmed: 16351328