Greater Postoperative Biceps Tendon Migration Following Biceps Tenodesis Correlates with Lower Patient Reported Outcomes Scores.

biceps clinical outcomes radiostereometric analysis shoulder tenodesis

Journal

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 06 01 2024
revised: 19 07 2024
accepted: 20 07 2024
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 22 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the relationship between tendon migration, as measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following biceps tenodesis (BT); to determine the likelihood of achieving clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) following BT; and to identify factors that impact CSO achievement. Patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral or open subpectoral BT at a single, high-volume academic medical center were prospectively enrolled. A tantalum bead sutured to the tenodesis construct was utilized as a radio-opaque marker. Biceps tendon migration was measured on calibrated radiographs at 12 weeks postoperatively. PROMs (Constant-Murley score [Constant], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systemic-Upper Extremity [PROMIS-UE]) were collected preoperatively and at ≥2 years follow-up. Of 115 patients enrolled, 94 (82%) patients were included (median age=52 years and BMI=31.4 kg/m A 1 cm-increase in tenodesed biceps tendon migration was associated with a decrease in Constant, SANE, and PROMIS-UE of 6, 2, and 4 points, respectively, at a mean of 2.9 years after surgery. Most patients achieved clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for these PROMs by latest follow-up, and greater biceps tendon construct migration was negatively associated with the likelihood of CSO achievement. IV, retrospective case series.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39173686
pii: S0749-8063(24)00570-X
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.037
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Brian Forsythe (B)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: forsythe.research@rushortho.com.

Elyse J Berlinberg (EJ)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Daanish Khazi-Syed (D)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA; The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Harsh H Patel (HH)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA; St. Joseph's Health, Paterson, NJ, USA.

Enrico M Forlenza (EM)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.

Kelechi R Okoroha (KR)

Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Brady T Williams (BT)

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.

Adam B Yanke (AB)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.

Brian J Cole (BJ)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.

Nikhil N Verma (NN)

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.

Classifications MeSH