"Killing two birds with one stone" - a qualitative study on women's perspectives on the dual prevention pill in Johannesburg, South Africa.


Journal

BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 06 11 2023
accepted: 17 07 2024
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 22 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

HIV incidence remains high in South Africa, with ~ 60% of all new HIV infections among adolescent girls and women (Country factsheets HIV and AIDS Estimates, 2022). Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), approved for HIV prevention in South Africa since 2015, is hampered by low uptake and adherence, particularly among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Combining oral PrEP with oral contraceptives could increase PrEP uptake, persistence and address unmet needs for contraception. We investigated the acceptability of a dual prevention pill (DPP), combining oral PrEP and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) for HIV and pregnancy prevention among women in Johannesburg, South Africa. Between March-July 2021, we conducted 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) with adolescent girls and women (n = 74) aged 16-40 stratified by ages (16-17, 18-24, 25-40), half of whom were COC users. We explored adolescent girls and women's opinions about the DPP concept, existing HIV and pregnancy prevention options, and input on perceived facilitators and barriers to DPP use. FGDs were conducted in English or isiZulu, using a standardized interview guide. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed to English and analyzed using ethnographic content analysis. The majority viewed the DPP favorably as a multipurpose option preventing unplanned pregnancy and HIV. Most saw it as a convenient "two-in-one" solution, requiring one clinic visit for both PrEP and COCs. AGYW were viewed as the most likely to benefit from the DPP due to the likelihood of multiple partners and unplanned sex, possibly preventing school dropout from unplanned pregnancy or HIV acquisition. The DPP was perceived to be more reliable than condoms, especially when condom negotiation is limited. Benefits were also seen by participants in rape cases, protecting against pregnancy and HIV. DPP use barriers included side effect concerns, unsupportive partners and judgmental healthcare providers. The DPP was perceived as acceptable for HIV and pregnancy prevention to AGYW in Johannesburg and its dual indications helpful in supporting improved PrEP uptake and persistence. DPP implementation programs need to consider solutions to potential barriers, like education on DPP benefits, coupled with reliable side effect support and healthcare provider sensitization as part of routine sexual health services to encourage uptake and adherence.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
HIV incidence remains high in South Africa, with ~ 60% of all new HIV infections among adolescent girls and women (Country factsheets HIV and AIDS Estimates, 2022). Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), approved for HIV prevention in South Africa since 2015, is hampered by low uptake and adherence, particularly among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW). Combining oral PrEP with oral contraceptives could increase PrEP uptake, persistence and address unmet needs for contraception. We investigated the acceptability of a dual prevention pill (DPP), combining oral PrEP and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) for HIV and pregnancy prevention among women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
METHODS METHODS
Between March-July 2021, we conducted 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) with adolescent girls and women (n = 74) aged 16-40 stratified by ages (16-17, 18-24, 25-40), half of whom were COC users. We explored adolescent girls and women's opinions about the DPP concept, existing HIV and pregnancy prevention options, and input on perceived facilitators and barriers to DPP use. FGDs were conducted in English or isiZulu, using a standardized interview guide. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed to English and analyzed using ethnographic content analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
The majority viewed the DPP favorably as a multipurpose option preventing unplanned pregnancy and HIV. Most saw it as a convenient "two-in-one" solution, requiring one clinic visit for both PrEP and COCs. AGYW were viewed as the most likely to benefit from the DPP due to the likelihood of multiple partners and unplanned sex, possibly preventing school dropout from unplanned pregnancy or HIV acquisition. The DPP was perceived to be more reliable than condoms, especially when condom negotiation is limited. Benefits were also seen by participants in rape cases, protecting against pregnancy and HIV. DPP use barriers included side effect concerns, unsupportive partners and judgmental healthcare providers.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
The DPP was perceived as acceptable for HIV and pregnancy prevention to AGYW in Johannesburg and its dual indications helpful in supporting improved PrEP uptake and persistence. DPP implementation programs need to consider solutions to potential barriers, like education on DPP benefits, coupled with reliable side effect support and healthcare provider sensitization as part of routine sexual health services to encourage uptake and adherence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39174929
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03269-8
pii: 10.1186/s12905-024-03269-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptives, Oral, Combined 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

462

Subventions

Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681
Organisme : WCG sub-agreement # 22010-202-440 in support of the Expanding Effective Contraceptive Options (EECO) project; US Agency for International Development (USAID) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT # AID-OAA-A-13-00088 Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
ID : R-1903-03681

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Ahmed K, Baeten JM, Beksinska M, Bekker L-G, Bukusi EA, Donnell D, et al. HIV incidence among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial. Lancet. 2019;394:303–13.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31288-7
UNICEF. Children and AIDS: Statistical update. Geneva: UNICEF; 2017. https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-aids-statistical-update/ Accessed 27 Jul 2023.
De Oliveira T, Kharsany AB, Gräf T, Cawood C, Khanyile D, Grobler A, et al. Transmission networks and risk of HIV infection in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a community-wide phylogenetic study. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e41–50.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30186-2 pubmed: 27914874
Kharsany AB, Cawood C, Lewis L, Yende-Zuma N, Khanyile D, Puren A, et al. Trends in HIV Prevention, Treatment, and Incidence in a Hyperendemic Area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1914378–e1914378.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14378 pubmed: 31675082 pmcid: 6826647
Bekker L-G, Rebe K, Venter F, Maartens G, Moorhouse M, Conradie F, et al. Southern African guidelines on the safe use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in persons at risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection. South Afr J HIV Med. 2016;17:455.
doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.455 pubmed: 29568613 pmcid: 5843155
NDOH. Guidelines for Expanding Combination Prevention and Treatment Options: Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Test and Treat (T&T). ; 2017. https://www.prepwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SA_ImplementationPack.pdf
SANAC. End-term review of the national strategic plan for hiv, tb and stis (2017 – 2022). Pretoria: ; 2023. https://sanac.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Final_Clean-END-TERM_REVIEW_OF_THE_NATIONAL_STRATEGIC_PLAN_FOR_HIV_TB_AND_STIs_2017__2022_20221129.pdf Accessed 6 Jun 2023).
Eakle R, Venter F, Rees H. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in an era of stalled HIV prevention: Can it change the game? Retrovirology. 2018;15:29.
doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0408-3 pubmed: 29609619 pmcid: 5879931
Yun K, Xu J, Zhang J, Li J, Hu Q, Chu Z, et al. Female and younger subjects have lower adherence in PrEP trials: a meta-analysis with implications for the uptake of PrEP service to prevent HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:163–8.
doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053217 pubmed: 28756409
Mugwanya K, et al., (presenter Pintye J). Uptake of PrEP within clinics providing integrated family planning and PrEP services: results from a large implementation program in Kenya. Oral abstract presentation (TUAC0304). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ; 2018.
Celum C, Hosek S, Tsholwana M, Kassim S, Mukaka S, Dye BJ, et al. PrEP uptake, persistence, adherence, and effect of retrospective drug level feedback on PrEP adherence among young women in southern Africa: Results from HPTN 082, a randomized controlled trial. PLOS Med. 2021;18:e1003670.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003670 pubmed: 34143779 pmcid: 8253429
Amico KR, Wallace M, Bekker LG, Roux S, Atujuna M, Sebastian E, et al. Experiences with HPTN 067/ADAPT study-provided open-label PrEP among women in Cape Town: facilitators and barriers within a mutuality framework. AIDS Behav. 2017;21:1361–75.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1458-y pubmed: 27317411
Calabrese S, Dovidio J, Tekeste M, Taggart T, Galvao R, Safon C, et al. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis stigma as a multidimensional barrier to uptake among women who attend Planned Parenthood. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;79:46–53.
Corneli A, Perry B, McKenna K, Agot K, Ahmed K, Taylor J, et al. Participants’ explanations for nonadherence in the FEM-PrEP clinical trial. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;71:452–61.
Jani N, Mathur S, Kahabuka C, Makyao N, Pilgrim N. Relationship dynamics and anticipated stigma: Key considerations for PrEP use among Tanzanian adolescent girls and young women and male partners. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246717.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246717 pubmed: 33596216 pmcid: 7888654
Bergam S, Harrison AD, Benghu N, Khumalo S, Tesfay N, Exner T, et al. Women’s Perceptions of HIV- and Sexuality-Related Stigma in Relation to PrEP: Qualitative Findings from the Masibambane Study, Durban, South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2022;26:2881–90.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03632-6 pubmed: 35218452 pmcid: 9378426
IPSOS. Assessing the potential of MPTs in Uganda, Nigeria and South Africa. Report commissioned by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 2014. http://www.theimpt.org/resource-results/35-reports/202-assessing-the-potential-of-mpts-in-south-africa-uganda-and-nigeria
Hynes J, Sales J, Sheth A, Lathrop E, Haddad L. Interest in multipurpose prevention technologies to prevent HIV/STIs and unintended pregnancy among young women in the United States. Contraception. 2018;97:277–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.006 pubmed: 29055782
Friedland BA, Plagianos M, Savel C, Kallianes V, Martinez C, Begg L, et al. Women Want Choices: Opinions from the Share.Learn.Shape Global Internet Survey About Multipurpose Prevention Technology (MPT) Products in Development. AIDS Behav. 2023;27:2190–204.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03951-8 pubmed: 36881183 pmcid: 10224828
van der Straten A, Agot K, Ahmed K, Weinrib R, Browne EN, Manenzhe K, et al. The Tablets, Ring, Injections as Options (TRIO) study: what young African women chose and used for future HIV and pregnancy prevention. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21:e25094.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25094 pubmed: 29600595 pmcid: 5876496
Karim S, Baxter C, Frohlich J, Karim Q. The need for multipurpose prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG. 2014;121:27–34.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12842 pubmed: 25335838
Moore L, Beksinska M, Rumphs A, Festin M, Gollub EL. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and behaviors associated with female condoms in developing countries: a scoping review. Open Access J Contracept. 2015;6:125–42.
doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S55041 pubmed: 29386930 pmcid: 5683136
Peasant C, Sullivan T, Weiss N, Martinez I, Meyer J. Beyond the syndemic: condom negotiation and use among women experiencing partner violence. AIDS Care. 2017;29:516–23.
doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1224296 pubmed: 27590004
Exavery A, Kanté A, Jackson E, Noronha J, Kikustahili G, Tani K, et al. Role of condom negotiation on condom use among women of reproductive age in three districts in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1097.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1097 pubmed: 23256530 pmcid: 3585459
IMPT. MPT Product Development Database. MPT Prod. Dev. Database. 2023. https://mpts101.org/ Accessed 6 Jun 2023).
PrEPWatch. Dual Prevention Pill. PrEPWatch. 2023. https://www.prepwatch.org/products/dual-prevention-pill/ (accessed 6 Jun 2023.
Begg L, Brodsky R, Friedland B, Mathur S, Sailer J, Creasy G. Estimating the market size for a dual prevention pill: adding contraception to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to increase uptake. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47:166–72.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200662 pubmed: 32737137
Milali MP, Resar D, Kaftan D, Campbell J, Olowu A, Edwards D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the dual prevention pill for contraception and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. Front Reprod Health. 2023;5:1144217.
doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1144217 pubmed: 37266447 pmcid: 10230827
PrEPWatch. FAQs about the DPP. AVAC; 2021. https://www.prepwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/FAQS-about-the-DPP.pdf Accessed 6 Jun 2023.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Contraceptive use by method 2019. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/contraceptive-use-method-2019 .
Gauteng AIDS Council. Strategic implementation plan for 2017 to 2022. Johannesburg: Gauteng AIDS Council; 2017.
LeCompte M, Schensul J. Designing and conducting ethnographic research. New York: Rowman Altamira; 2010.
Schensul SL, Schensul JJ, LeCompte MD. Essential ethnographic methods: Observations, interviews, and questionnaires. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 1999.
Rousseau E, Katz AWK, O’Rourke S, Bekker L-G, Delany-Moretlwe S, Bukusi E, et al. Adolescent girls and young women’s PrEP-user journey during an implementation science study in South Africa and Kenya. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0258542.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258542 pubmed: 34648589 pmcid: 8516266
Mansoor LE, Lewis L, Naicker CL, Harkoo I, Dawood H, Naidoo K, et al. Prospective study of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation and adherence among young women in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25:e25957.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25957 pubmed: 35785472 pmcid: 9251857
Beesham I, Joseph Davey DL, Beksinska M, Bosman S, Smit J, Mansoor LE. Daily Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Continuation Among Women from Durban, South Africa, Who Initiated PrEP as Standard of Care for HIV Prevention in a Clinical Trial. AIDS Behav. 2022;26:2623–31.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03592-x pubmed: 35122575 pmcid: 9252967
Nyblade L, Ndirangu JW, Speizer IS, Browne FA, Bonner CP, Minnis A, et al. Stigma in the health clinic and implications for PrEP access and use by adolescent girls and young women: conflicting perspectives in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1916.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14236-z pubmed: 36242000 pmcid: 9563466
Nyblade L, Mbuya-Brown RJ, Ezekiel MJ, Addo NA, Sabasaba AN, Atuahene K, et al. A total facility approach to reducing HIV stigma in health facilities: implementation process and lessons learned. AIDS. 2020;34:S93.
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002585 pubmed: 32881798
Lanham M, Ridgeway K, Mireku M, Nhamo D, Pillay D, Murire M, et al. Health care providers’ attitudes toward and experiences delivering oral PrEP to adolescent girls and young women in Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1112.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06978-0 pubmed: 34663320 pmcid: 8522219
Mbewe L, Govender E. Male partners’ influence on women’s acceptance and use of PrEP products across two high HIV-burdened districts in South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res AJAR. 2020;19:93–100.
doi: 10.2989/16085906.2020.1727932 pubmed: 32320329
Pulerwitz, A., Gottert, M. Betron, and D. Shattuck on behalf of the Male Engagement Task Force. Do’s and don’ts for engaging men & boys. Washington, D.C.: USAID Inter-agency Gender Working Group (IGWG); 2019. https://www.igwg.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Male-Engagement_DosDonts_Final.pdf
Velloza J, Khoza N, Scorgie F, Chitukuta M, Mutero P, Mutiti K, Mangxilana N, Nobula L, Bulterys MA, Atujuna M, Hosek S, Heffron R, Bekker LG, Mgodi N, Chirenje M, Celum C, Delany-Moretlwe S, HPTN 082 study group. The influence of HIV-related stigma on PrEP disclosure and adherence among adolescent girls and young women in HPTN 082: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(3):e25463. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25463 .
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25463 pubmed: 32144874 pmcid: 7060297
Birdthistle I, Mulwa S, Sarrassat S, Baker V, Khanyile D, O’Donnell D, Cawood C, Cousens S. Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: a mixed-methods impact evaluation of “MTV Shuga Down South.” BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(4):e007641. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007641 . PMID:35365480;PMCID:PMC8977807.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007641 pubmed: 35365480 pmcid: 8977807
Duby Z, Bunce B, Fowler C, Jonas K, Bergh K, Govindasamy D, Wagner C, Mathews C. “These Girls Have a Chance to be the Future Generation of HIV Negative”: Experiences of Implementing a PrEP Programme for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2023;27(1):134–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03750-1 . Epub 2022 Jul 6. PMID: 35793053; PMCID: PMC9258476.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03750-1 pubmed: 35793053
Reza-Paul S, Lazarus L, Jana S, Ray P, Mugo N, Ngure K, et al. Community Inclusion in PrEP Demonstration Projects: Lessons for Scaling Up. Gates Open Res. 2019;3:1504.
doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13042.1 pubmed: 31942537 pmcid: 6943951
Perez-Urbano I, Dilraj A, Pitsi A, Hlongwane N, Abdelatif N, Dietrich J, Ahmed K. Strategies to Close the PrEP Uptake Gap Among Transgender People and Men Who Have Sex with Men in Tshwane, South Africa: Perspectives from the Community. AIDS Behav. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04300-7 . Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38427124.

Auteurs

Siyanda Tenza (S)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. stenza@wrhi.ac.za.

Lydia Mampuru (L)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Mpho Moji (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Sihle Zulu (S)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Lorna Begg (L)

Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, NY, USA.

Irene V Bruce (IV)

Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, NY, USA.

Krishnaveni Reddy (K)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, NY, USA.

Barbara A Friedland (BA)

Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council, New York, NY, USA.

Thesla Palanee-Phillips (T)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits RHI, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Epidemiology; School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Sanyukta Mathur (S)

Social and Behavioral Research, Population Council, Washington, DC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH