Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) Scores and Outcomes After Arthroscopic Meniscectomy.

knee meniscectomy meniscus negative pain thoughts patient-reported outcomes

Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pain is multifactorial, and pain intensity has been shown to be influenced by patients' thoughts. The Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) can be used to quantify unhelpful negative cognitive biases about pain, but the relationship between negative pain thoughts and orthopaedic surgery outcomes is not known. To evaluate the prevalence of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy using the NPTQ-SF survey and assess the relationship these thoughts have to knee function, general health, pain, and satisfaction before and after surgery. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. In total, 146 patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were administered the 4-item NPTQ-SF, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, and visual analog scale pain survey preoperatively between July 2021 and August 2022. The same surveys were completed at a minimum of 3 months and no later than 1 year postoperatively by 92 patients confirmed to have undergone meniscectomy. NPTQ-SF scores were correlated with IKDC, SF-12, and satisfaction score preoperatively and at least 3 months postoperatively (mean, 108.5 ± 43.7 days). Preoperative NPTQ-SF scores were significantly negatively correlated with postoperative IKDC ( The level of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing meniscectomy is related to knee function, general health, and pain. Patients with a high level of negative pain thoughts are less likely to achieve a favorable outcome from meniscectomy, with a score ≥8 representing a clinically significant threshold for preoperative screening.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Pain is multifactorial, and pain intensity has been shown to be influenced by patients' thoughts. The Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) can be used to quantify unhelpful negative cognitive biases about pain, but the relationship between negative pain thoughts and orthopaedic surgery outcomes is not known.
PURPOSE UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the prevalence of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy using the NPTQ-SF survey and assess the relationship these thoughts have to knee function, general health, pain, and satisfaction before and after surgery.
STUDY DESIGN UNASSIGNED
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
In total, 146 patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were administered the 4-item NPTQ-SF, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, and visual analog scale pain survey preoperatively between July 2021 and August 2022. The same surveys were completed at a minimum of 3 months and no later than 1 year postoperatively by 92 patients confirmed to have undergone meniscectomy.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
NPTQ-SF scores were correlated with IKDC, SF-12, and satisfaction score preoperatively and at least 3 months postoperatively (mean, 108.5 ± 43.7 days). Preoperative NPTQ-SF scores were significantly negatively correlated with postoperative IKDC (
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
The level of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing meniscectomy is related to knee function, general health, and pain. Patients with a high level of negative pain thoughts are less likely to achieve a favorable outcome from meniscectomy, with a score ≥8 representing a clinically significant threshold for preoperative screening.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39175395
doi: 10.1177/03635465241265321
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3635465241265321

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.G. has received consulting fees from Medical Device Business Services and Zimmer Biomet Holdings; and support for education from Legacy Ortho. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Auteurs

Brian Johnson (B)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

John Bonamer (J)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Cameron Thomson (C)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Jorge Figueras (J)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Nihar Shah (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Ramsey Samir Sabbagh (RS)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Henry Kuechly (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Brian Newyear (B)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Nakul Narendran (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Brian Grawe (B)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Classifications MeSH