Case Report: Plummer's adenoma in Prader-Willi syndrome.
GH therapy
Plummer’s adenoma
children
subclinical hyperthyroidism
thyroid nodule
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
28
02
2024
accepted:
22
07
2024
medline:
23
8
2024
pubmed:
23
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Thyroid nodules in children are less common than in adults but they are approximately two- to three-fold more likely to be malignant in children. Among thyroid nodular diseases, Plummer's adenoma occurs very rarely in pediatrics, and currently, there is no literature providing evidence of this diagnosis in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). We report the case of a 9-year-old Caucasian boy affected by PWS presenting with a rapidly growing palpable mass in the thyroid lodge associated with subclinical hyperthyroidism. Laboratory and other examinations (thyroid ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration of the nodule, and scintigraphy) were strongly suggestive for Plummer's adenoma; therefore, the patient underwent left hemithyroidectomy surgery, and anatomo-pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. Our case describes the first evidence of an isolated follicular adenoma in children with PWS. Surgery is the only therapeutic option in younger children. Further evidence is needed to assess the possible correlation between these two conditions and the existence of potential risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39175805
doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1388437
pmc: PMC11338776
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1388437Informations de copyright
© 2024 Corica, Toscano, Moleti, Pepe, Campenni, Fadda, Dionigi, Romeo, Aversa and Wasniewska.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and final decision.