The challenges and opportunities of offering and integrating training in clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics: A survey of LGG Fellowship Program Directors.
ACGME
Cytogenetics
Fellowship
Molecular genetics
Training
Journal
Genetics in medicine open
ISSN: 2949-7744
Titre abrégé: Genet Med Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918734281906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
medline:
23
8
2024
pubmed:
23
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The specialty of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics (LGG) was created in 2017 in an effort to reflect the increasing convergence in technologies and approaches between clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics. However, there has not yet been any formal evaluation of the merging of these disciplines and the challenges faced by Program Directors (PDs) tasked with ensuring the successful training of laboratory geneticists under the new model. An electronic multi-question Qualtrics survey was created and was sent to the PD for each of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited LGG fellowship programs at the time. The data were collected, and the responses were aggregated for each question. All of the responding PDs had started training at least 1 LGG fellow. PDs noted challenges with funding, staff shortages, molecular/cytogenetics content integration, limited total training time, increased remote work, increased sendout testing, and a lack of prior cytogenetics knowledge among incoming fellows. This survey attempted to assess the challenges that LGG PDs have been facing in offering and integrating clinical molecular genetics and clinical cytogenetics fellowship training. Common challenges between programs were noted, and a set of 6 concluding comments are provided to facilitate future discussion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39175871
doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101820
pmc: PMC11340206
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.