Gradient-induced vibrations and motion-induced Lenz effects on conductive nonmagnetic orthopedic implants in MRI.

Lenz effects Lorentz force displacement force dynamic torques implants mechanical vibrations

Journal

Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
revised: 02 08 2024
received: 16 04 2024
accepted: 04 08 2024
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To quantify the extent of gradient-induced vibrations, and the magnitude of motion-induced displacement forces ("Lenz effect"), in conductive nonmagnetic orthopedic prostheses. The investigation is carried out through numerical simulations, for a 3 T scanner. For gradient-induced torques and vibrations, a knee and a shoulder implant are considered, at dB/dt equal to 42 T/s (rms). For motion-induced forces associated with the Lenz effect, a knee and a hip implant are studied, considering a patient who translates on the examination couch, or walks next to it. Gradient-induced torques may be within the same order of magnitude as the worst case gravitational torque defined in the ASTM standards. However, for all investigated cases, they result to be lower. In vacuum, the extent of the corresponding vibration reduces with frequency. At the lowest investigated frequency (270 Hz), it keeps below 25 μm. For an implant partially embedded in bone, the extent of the vibration increases with frequency. Nevertheless, the displacement is far lower than the worst case observed in vacuum (negligible in contact with the bone; ˜1 μm or less where the implant emerges from the bone). The Lenz effect induced by the motion of the patient through the stationary magnetic field produces forces on the order of a few millinewtons (i.e., at least two orders of magnitude lower than the implant weight). Comparing the results with mechanical loads caused by ordinary activities of daily living, and with the levels of tolerable micromotions, a good safety margin is confirmed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39176421
doi: 10.1002/mrm.30263
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : European Partnership on Metrology
ID : 21NRM05 STASIS

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Références

ASTM International. ASTM F2503‐23 Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment. ASTM; 2023.
Fagan AJ, Bitz AK, Björkman‐Burtscher IM, et al. 7T MR safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53:333‐346.
Delfino JG, Woods TO. New developments in standards for MRI safety testing of medical devices. Curr Radiol Rep. 2016;4:28.
Panych LP, Madore B. The physics of MRI safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:28‐43.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). IEC 60601–2‐33 Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 2–33: Particular Requirements for the Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Magnetic Resonance Equipment for Medical Diagnosis, Edition 4.0. IEC; 2022.
ACR Committee on MR Safety. ACR Manual on MR Safety, Version 1.0. American College of Radiology; 2020.
Hartwell RC, Shellock FG. MRI of cervical fixation devices: sensation of heating caused by vibration of metallic components. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:771‐772.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/TS 10974 Assessment of the Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients with an Active Implantable Medical Device. 2nd ed. ISO; 2018.
Fuhrer E, Jouda M, Gruschke OG, Korvink JG. Optical gauge head to evaluate gradient field induced vibrations of conductive structures during MRI. In 2017 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Verona, Italy. IEEE; 2016. doi:10.1109/ICEAA.2017.8065581
Fuhrer E, Jouda M, Klein CO, Wilhelm M, Korvink JG. Gradient‐induced mechanical vibration of neural interfaces during MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67:915‐923.
Childers M, Sethna D, Sison S. MRI gradient induced vibration of leadless pacemakers. In 2023 ISMRM & ISMRT Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Toronto, Canada. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2023 Abstract 2875.
Condon B, Hadley DM. Potential MR Hazard to patients with metallic heart valves: the Lenz effect. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:171‐176.
Robertson NM, Diaz‐Gomez M, Condon B. Estimation of torque on mechanical heart valves due to magnetic resonance imaging including an estimation of the significance of the Lenz effect using a computational model. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3793‐3807.
Golestanirad L, Dlala E, Wright G, Mosig JR, Graham SJ. Comprehensive analysis of Lenz effect on the artificial heart valves during magnetic resonance imaging. Prog Electromagn Res. 2012;128:1‐17.
Edwards MB, Mclean J, Solomonidis S, Condon B, Gourlay T. In vitro assessment of the Lenz effect on heart valve prostheses at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:74‐82.
Graf H, Lauer UA, Schick F. Eddy‐current induction in extended metallic parts As a source of considerable torsional moment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:585‐590.
ASTM International. ASTM F2213‐17 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment. ASTM; 2017.
Nyenhuis JA. Heating and torque of passive metallic implants by gradient dBdt and static field B0 in MRI. Proceedings of the 2020 ISMRM & SMRT Virtual Conference & Exhibition. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2020:4212.
Shellock FG, Rosen MS, Webb A, et al. Managing patients with unlabeled passive implants on MR systems operating below 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023;59:1514‐1522. doi:10.1002/jmri.29002
ASTM International. ASTM F2052‐21 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Torque on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment. ASTM; 2021.
Zilberti L, Arduino A, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M. The underestimated role of gradient coils in MRI safety. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77:13‐15.
Winter L, Seifert F, Zilberti L, Murbach M, Ittermann B. MRI‐related heating of implants and devices: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;53:1646‐1665.
CST software website. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/cst‐studio‐suite.
Arduino A, Baruffaldi F, Bottauscio O, et al. Computational dosimetry in MRI in presence of hip, knee or shoulder implants: do we need accurate surgery models? Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:245022.
Ansys Mechanical software website. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.ansys.com/.
Zdero R, Brzozowsky P, Schemitsch EH. Biomechanical properties of artificial bones made by sawbones: a review. Med Eng Phys. 2023;118:104017.
Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M. A potential‐based formulation for motion‐induced electric fields in MRI. IEEE Trans Magn. 2016;52:1‐4.
Zilberti L, Bottauscio O, Chiampi M. Assessment of exposure to MRI motion‐induced fields based on the international commission on non‐ionizing radiation protection (ICNIRP) guidelines. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76:1291‐1300.
Gosselin MC, Neufeld E, Moser H, et al. Development of a new generation of high‐resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: the virtual population 3.0. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:5287‐5303.
Viceconti M, Monti L, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Toni A. Even a thin layer of soft tissue may compromise the primary stability of cementlesship stems. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:765‐775.
Ghoul WE, Chidiac JJ. Prosthetic requirements for immediate implant loading: a review. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:141‐154.
Van Arkel RJ, Ghouse S, Milner PE, Jeffers JRT. Additive manufactured push‐fit implant fixation with screw‐strength pull out. J Orthop Res. 2018;36:1508‐1518.
Gao X, Fraulob M, Haiat G. Biomechanical behaviours of the bone–implant interface: a review. J R Soc Interface. 2019;16:20190259.
Kohli N, Stddart JC, Van Arkel RJ. The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10797.
Immel K, Nguyen VH, Haiat G, Sauer RA. Modeling the debonding process of osseointegrated implants due to coupled adhesion and friction. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2023;22:133‐158.
Chong DYR, Hansen UN, Amis AA. Analysis of bone–prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions. J Biomech. 2010;43:1074‐1080.
Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;7:859‐871.
Kutzner I, Heilein B, Graichen F, et al. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. J Biomech. 2010;43:2164‐2173.

Auteurs

Luca Zilberti (L)

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Torino, Italy.

Cristina Curreli (C)

Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Alessandro Arduino (A)

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Torino, Italy.

Umberto Zanovello (U)

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Torino, Italy.

Fabio Baruffaldi (F)

Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Oriano Bottauscio (O)

Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Torino, Italy.

Classifications MeSH